Accounting for multi-functionality of sheep farming in the carbon footprint of lamb: A comparison of three contrasting Mediterranean systems

Agricultural Systems

Volumn 116, Issue , 2013, Pages 60-68

  Ripoll Bosch, R ^a   de Boer, I J M ^b   Bernues A ^a,c   Vellinga, T V ^b  

^a Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2   (Spain)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Allocation; Cultural ecosystem services; Life cycle assessment; Mediterranean sheep systems

Indexed keywords

BODY MASS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EMISSION CONTROL; GRAZING MANAGEMENT; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIVESTOCK FARMING; MEAT; PASTURE; SHEEP; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; YOUNG POPULATION;

MEDITERRANEAN REGION; SPAIN;

ANIMALIA; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84888826415     PISSN: 0308521X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Barrantes O., Ferrer C., Reiné R., Broca.A. Categorization of grazing systems to aid the development of land use policy in Aragon, Spain. Grass Forage Sci. 2009, 64(1):26-41.
2. Basset-Mens C., Van Der Werf H.M.G. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 105(1-2):127-144.
3. Baumann, H., Tillman, A., 2004. The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA: An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Application. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden.
4. Baylis K., Peplow S., Rausser G., Simon L. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: a comparison. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65(4):753-764.
5. Beauchemin K.A., Kreuzer M., O'Mara F., McAllister T.A. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48:21-27.
6. Beccali M., Cellura M., Iudicello M., Mistretta M. Resource consumption and environmental impacts of the agrofood sector: life cycle assessment of Italian citrus-based products. Environ. Manage. 2009, 43(4):707-724.
7. Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D., Gordon L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12(12):1394-1404.
8. Benton T.G., Vickery J.A., Wilson J.D. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18(4):182-188.
9. Bernués A., Riedel J.L., Asensio M.A., Blanco M., Sanz A., Revilla R., Casasús I. An integrated approach to studying the role of grazing livestock systems in the conservation of rangelands in a protected natural park (Sierra de Guara, Spain). Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005, 96:75-85.
10. Bernués A., Ruiz R., Olaizola A., Villalba D., Casasús I. Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: synergies and trade-offs. Livest. Sci. 2011, 139:44-57.
11. Caballero R. Typology of cereal-sheep farming systems in Castile-la-Mancha (south-central Spain). Agric. Syst. 2001, 68(3):215-232.
12. Caballero R. A set of guidance for the management of grazing units in the cereal-sheep system of Castile-la-Mancha (south-central Spain). J. Sustain. Agric. 2003, 21(3):11-28.
13. Carrasco S., Ripoll G., Sanz A., álvarez-Rodríguez J., Panea B., Revilla R., Joy M. Effect of feeding system on growth and carcass characteristics of Churra Tensina light lambs. Livest. Sci. 2009, 121(1):56-63.
14. Casasús I., Bernués A., Sanz A., Villalba D., Riedel J.L., Revilla R. Vegetation dynamics in Mediterranean forest pastures as affected by beef cattle grazing. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 121(4):365-370.
15. Cederberg C., Mattsson B. Life cycle assessment of milk production - a comparison of conventional and organic farming. J. Clean. Prod. 2000, 8(1):49-60.
16. Cederberg C., Stadig M. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2003, 8(6):350-356.
17. Costanza R., D'Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Peruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., Van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
18. De Boer I.J.M. Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 80(1-2):69-77.
19. De Rancourt M., Fois N., Lavín M.P., Tchakérian E., Vallerand F. Mediterranean sheep and goats production: an uncertain future. Small Ruminant Res. 2006, 62(3):167-179.
20. De Vries M., De Boer I.J.M. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest. Sci. 2010, 128(1-3):1-11.
21. EcoInvent, 2009. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. Version 2.1. <>. http://www.ecoinvent.org.
22. Edwards-Jones G., Plassmann K., Harris I.M. Carbon footprinting of lamb and beef production systems: insights from an empirical analysis of farms in Wales, UK. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 147(6):707-719.
23. EEA High Nature Value Farmland: Characteristics, Trends and Policy Challenges. EEA Technical Report 1/2004 2004, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, p. 31.
24. EEA The European Environment - State and Outlook 2005 2005, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, p. 580.
25. EEA Distribution and Targeting of the CAP Budget from a Biodiversity Perspective. EEA Technical Report 12/2009 2009, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, pp. 90.
26. EEA The European Environment - State and Outlook 2010: Synthesis 2010, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, p. 222.
27. Ekvall T., Finnveden G. Allocation in ISO 14041 - a critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2001, 9(3):197-208.
28. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65(4):663-674.
29. EU, 2005. Council Regulation (EC) 1698/2005 on Support for Rural Development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
30. FAO, 2010. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector - A Life Cycle Assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, p. 94.
31. FAOSTAT, 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database.
32. Farley J., Costanza R. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(11):2060-2068.
33. FEDNA, 2010. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal. <> (Last accessed 10.05.11). http://www1.etsia.upm.es/fedna/introtabla.htm.
34. Gerber P., Vellinga T.V., Opio C., Steinfeld H. Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livest. Sci. 2011, 139:100-108.
35. Gill M., Smith P., Wilkinson J.M. Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock. Animal 2010, 4(3):323-333.
36. Guinée J.B., Heijungs R., Huppes G. Economic allocation: examples and derived decision tree. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2004, 9(1):23-33.
37. Haas G., Wetterich F., Geier U. Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on the farm level. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2000, 5(6):345-348.
38. Henle K., Alard D., Clitherow J., Cobb P., Firbank L., Kull T., McCracken D., Moritz R.F.A., Niemelä J., Rebane M., Wascher D., Watt A., Young J. Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe - a review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 124:60-71.
39. IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Japan.
40. IPCC, 2007. Technical summary. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 19-91.
41. ISO, 2006. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva.
42. Kramer K., Groen T.A., Van Wieren S.E. The interacting effects of ungulates and fire on forest dynamics: an analysis using the model FORSPACE. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 181(1-2):205-222.
43. Ledgard S.F., Lieffering M., McDevitt J., Boyes M., Kemp R. A greenhouse Gas Footprint Study for Exported New Zealand Lamb 2010, Agresearch, New Zealand, p. 24.
44. Ledgard, S.F., Lorinque, E., Gac, A., Boyes, M., Le Gall, A. 2011. LCA of sheep meat produced in different farm systems in France and New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 2nd New Zealand Life Cycle Assessment Conference. LCA: A business compass for sustainable development. > (accessed 26.07.12). http://www.lcaconference.org.
45. MARM, 2009. Anuario de estadística 2008. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino. Madrid, España, p. 1150.
46. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
47. Neumann K., Verburg P.H., Elbersen B., Stehfest E., Woltjer G.B. Multi-scale scenarios of spatial-temporal dynamics in the European livestock sector. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 140:88-101.
48. OECD Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework 2001, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.
49. Pagiola S., Ramírez E., Gobbi J., de Haan C., Ibrahim M., Murgueitio E., Ruiz J.P. Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64(2):374-385.
50. PDR, 2009. Programa de desarrollo rural de Aragón 2007-2013, España, Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón, p. 404.
51. Piorr H. Environmental policy, agri-environmental indicators and landscape indicators. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 98(1-3):17-33.
52. Plieninger T., Höchtl F., Spek T. Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environ. Sci. Policy 2006, 9(4):317-321.
53. Riedel J.L., Casasús I., Bernués A. Sheep farming intensification and utilization of natural resources in a Mediterranean pastoral agro-ecosystem. Livest. Sci. 2007, 111(1-2):153-163.
54. Ripoll-Bosch R., Díez-Unquera B., Ruiz R., Villalba D., Molina E., Joy M., Olaizola A., Bernués A. An integrated sustainability assessment of Mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agric. Syst. 2012, 105:46-56.
55. SEEP, 2010. Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos. Database " Spanish Pastures (SEEP)" <> (last accessed 10.05.11). http://www.uco.es/sia/en/paginas.php?pagina=bancos.
56. Steinfeld H., Gerber P. Livestock production and the global environment: consume less or produce better?. PNAS 2010, 107(43):18237-18238.
57. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., Haan, C.d., 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy, p. 390.
58. Swinton S.M., Lupi F., Robertson G.P., Hamilton S.K. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64(2):245-252.
59. Thomassen M.A., van Calker K.J., Smits M.C.J., Iepema G.L., de Boer I.J.M. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agric. Syst. 2008, 96(1-3):95-107.
60. Tscharntke T., Klein A.M., Kruess A., Steffan-Dewenter I., Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8(8):857-874.
61. Wilkinson J.M. Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal 2011, 5(7):1014-1022.
62. Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., Sandars, D.L., 2006. Determining the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0205. Bedford, UK, p. 97.
63. Wunder S., Engel S., Pagiola S. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65(4):834-852.