Different Understandings of Life as an Opportunity to Enrich the Debate About Synthetic Biology

NanoEthics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 179-188

  Deplazes Zemp, Anna ^a   Gregorowius, Daniel ^a   Biller Andorno, Nikola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Artificial life; Biotechnology; ELSA; Gene technology; Life; Public dialogue; Public engagement; RRI; Synthetic biology; World views

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939256718     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-015-0226-1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Attfield R (2012) Biocentrism and artificial life. Environ Values 21:83–94. doi:10.3197/096327112X13225063228069
2. Ball P (2010) Making life: a comment on ‘Playing God in Frankenstein’s footsteps: synthetic biology and the meaning of life’ by Henk van den Belt (2009). Nanoethics 4:129–132. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0091-x
3. Biel A, Nilsson A (2005) Religious values and environmental concern: harmony and detachment. Soc Sci Q 86(1):178–191. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00297.x
4. Bovenkerk B (2012) Biotechnology. An anatomy of the debate. In: Bovenkerk B (ed) The biotechnology debate. Democracy in the face of intractable disagreement. Springer, New York, pp 19–61
5. Buchanan A (2002) Social moral epistemology. Soc Philos Pol 19:126–152. doi:10.1017/S0265052502192065
6. Caplan A (2010) The end of vitalism. Nature 465(7297):422–424. doi:10.1038/465422a
7. Carr PA, Church GM (2009) Genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol 27(12):1151–1162. doi:10.1038/nbt.1590
8. Cho MK, Magnus D, Caplan AL, McGee D (1999) Policy forum: genetics. Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome. Science 286(5447):2087, 2089–2090
9. Cohen J (1993) Freedom of expression. Philos Public Aff 22(3):207–263
10. Collins J (2010) Got parts, need manual. Nature 465(7297):424. doi:10.1038/465422a
11. Comstock G (2010) Ethics and genetically modified foods. In: Gottwald F-T, Ingensiep HW, Meinhardt M (eds) Food ethics. Springer, New York, pp 49–66
12. Darwall SL (1977) Two kinds of respect. Ethics 88(1):36–49
13. Davies S, McCallie E, Simonsson E, Lehr JL, Duensing S (2009) Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy. Public Underst Sci 18(3):338–353. doi:10.1177/0963662507079760
14. Deplazes-Zemp A (2012) The moral impact of synthesising living organisms: biocentric views on synthetic biology. Environ Values 21:63–82. doi:10.3197/096327112X13225063228023
15. Deplazes-Zemp A (2012) The conception of life in synthetic biology. Sci Eng Ethics 18:757–774. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9269-z
16. Deplazes-Zemp A (2013) Introduction to special issue, synthetic biology and the notion of “producing life” in different cultures. Worldviews 17:1–9. doi:10.1163/15685357-01701001
17. Deplazes-Zemp A, Biller-Andorno N (2012) Explaining life. Synthetic biology and non-scientific understandings of life. EMBO Rep 13(11):959–963. doi:10.1038/embor.2012.150
18. Dürnberger C (2008) Der Mythos der Ursprünglichkeit – Landwirtschaftliche Idylle und ihre Rolle in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung. Forum TTN 2008(19):45–52
19. Fiala A (2004) Toleration. In Fieser J, Dowden B (Eds). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP): http://www.iep.utm.edu/tolerati/
20. Gaskell G, Allum N, Stares S (2003) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002, Eurobarometer 58.0, A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project ‘Life Sciences in European Society’ QLG7-CT-1999-00286
21. Goven J (2006) Processes of inclusion, cultures of calculation, structures of power: scientific citizenship and the royal commission on genetic modification. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(5):565–598. doi:10.1177/0162243906289612
22. Gregorowius D, Lindemann-Matthies P, Huppenbauer M (2012) Ethical discourse on the use of genetically modified crops: a review of academic publications in the fields of ecology and environmental ethics. J Agric Environ Ethics 25(3):265–293. doi:10.1007/s10806-011-9330-6
23. Heyd D (1996) Introduction. In: Heyd D (ed) Toleration, an elusive virtue. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 3–17
24. Huesken S (2014) Artificial life and ethics. Nanoethics 8:111–116. doi:10.1007/s11569-013-0186-2
25. Katz E (1993) Artefacts and functions: a note on the value of nature. Environ Value 2(3):223–232. doi:10.3197/096327193776679909
26. Koshland DE Jr (2002) Special essay. The seven pillars of life. Science 295(5563):2215–2216. doi:10.1126/science.1068489
27. Krimsky S (2005) From Asilomar to industrial biotechnology: risks, reductionism and regulation. Sci Cult 18(5):309–323. doi:10.1080/09505430500368998
28. Kronman AT (2000) Is diversity a value in American higher education. Fac Scholarsh Ser 52(5)
29. Lammerts van Bueren ET, Struik PC (2005) Integrity and rights of plants: ethical notions in organic plant breeding and propagation. J Agric Environ Ethics 18(5):479–493. doi:10.1007/s10806-005-0903-0
30. Madsen KH, Holm PB, Lassen J, Sandøe P (2002) Ranking genetically modified plants according to familiarity. J Agric Environ Ethics 15(3):267–278. doi:10.1023/A:1015729011895
31. Mill JS (2008) On liberty. In: Gray J (ed) On liberty and other essays. Oxford World’s Classics, Oxford, pp 5–130
32. Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39:751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093
33. Powers M, Faden R (2006) Social Justice, the moral foundations of public health and health policy. New York Oxford University Press, Oxford
34. Rehmann-Sutter (2013) How do we see that something is living? Synthetic creatures and phenomenology of perception. Worldviews 17:10–25. doi:10.1163/15685357-01701002
35. Sample I (2010) Craig Venter creates synthetic life form. http://www.guardian.co.uk, 20 May
36. Scanlon T (1972) A theory of freedom of expression. Philos Public Aff 1(2):204–226
37. Siegrist M (1998) Belief in gene technology: the influence of environmental attitudes and gender. Personal Individ Differ 24(6):861–866. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00021-X
38. Simpson ML (2006) Cell-free synthetic biology: a bottom-up approach to discovery by design. Mol Syst Biol 2:69. doi:10.1038/msb4100104
39. Sjöberg L (2004) Principles of risk perception applied to gene technology. EMBO reports, 5 Spec No, S47-51, doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400258
40. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978) The Belmont Report, Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research
41. Torgersen H, Hampel JR (2012) Calling controversy: assessing synthetic biology’s conflict potential. Public Underst Sci 21(2):134–148. doi:10.1177/0963662510389266
42. von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, London, pp 51–74
43. Wolstenholme G (1963) Man and his future. Little, Brown and Company, Boston
44. Wynne B (1993) Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Publ Underst Sci 2(321–337). doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/003.
45. Zwart H, Landeweerd L, von Rooij A (2014) Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’. Life Sci Soc Policy 10(11):1–19. doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x