The moral impact of synthesising living organisms: Biocentric views on synthetic biology

Environmental Values

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 63-82

  Deplazes Zemp, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biocentrism; Biotechnology; Synthetic biology; Synthetic organisms

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; MORTALITY;

EID: 84857675782     PISSN: 09632719     EISSN: 17527015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3197/096327112X13225063228023     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andrianantoandro, E., Basu, S., Karig, D. K. and Weiss, R. 2006. 'Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline'. Molecular Systems Biology 2: 1-14.
2. Attfield, R. 1995a. 'Genetic engineering: can unnatural kinds be wronged?', in P. Wheale and R. McNally (eds.), Animal Genetic Engineering: Of Pigs, Oncomice and Men (London: Pluto Press), pp. 201-210.
3. Attfield, R. 1995b. Value, Obligation and Meta-Ethics. Amsterdam etc.: Rodopi.
4. Attfield, R. 1998. 'Intrinsic value and transgenic animals', in A. Holland and A. Johnson (eds.), Animal Biotechnology and Ethics (London: Chapman & Hall), pp.172-189.
5. Attfield, R. 2003. Environmental Ethics, an Overview for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Baker, D., Church, G., Collins, J., Endy, D., Jacobson, J., Keasling, J., Modrich, P., Smolke, C. and Weiss, R. 2006. 'Engineering Life: Building a FAB for Biology'. Scientific American 294: 44-51.
7. Ball, P. 2007. 'Synthetic biology: designs for life'. Nature 448 (7149): 32-3.
8. Bentham, J. 2000 (1781). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Batoche Books.
9. Buchanan, A. 2009. 'Moral status and human enhancement'. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37(4): 346-381.
10. Deamer, D. 2005. 'A giant step towards artificial life?'. Trends in Biotechnology 23(7): 336-8.
11. Deplazes, A. 2009. 'Piecing together a puzzle. An exposition of synthetic biology'. EMBO Reports 10(5): 428-32.
12. Deplazes, A. and Huppenbauer, M. 2009. 'Synthetic organisms and living machines: Positioning the products of synthetic biology at the borderline between living and non-living matter'. Systems and Synthetic Biology 3: 55-63.
13. Deplazes-Zemp, A. 2011. 'The Conception of Life in Synthetic Biology'. Science and Engineering Ethics, Online First.
14. Gibson, D. G., Glass, J. I., Lartigue, C., Noskov, V. N., Chuang, R. Y., Algire, M. A., Benders, G. A., Montague, M. G., Ma, L., Moodie, M. M., Merryman, C., Vashee, S., Krishnakumar, R., Assad-Garcia, N., Andrews-Pfannkoch, C., Denisova, E. A., Young, L., Qi, Z. Q., Segall-Shapiro, T. H., Calvey, C. H., Parmar, P. P., Hutchison, C. A., 3rd, Smith, H. O. and Venter, J. C. 2010. 'Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome'. Science 329(5987): 52-56.
15. Goodpaster, K. 1978. 'On being morally considerable'. Journal of Philosophy, Inc. 75(6): 308-325.
16. Holland, A. 2002. 'Artificial lives: philosophical dimensions of farm animal biotechnology', in R. Sherlock and J. D. Morrey (eds.), Ethical Issues in Biotechnology (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield), pp. 309-323.
17. Hursthouse, R. 2007. 'Virtue ethics', in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonidentity-problem/.
18. Kawall, J. 2003. 'Reverence for life as a viable environmental virtue'. Environmental Ethics 25(339-358.
19. Lee, K. 1999. The Natural and the Artefactual: The Implications of Deep Science and Deep Technology for Environmental Philosophy. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Lexington Books.
20. Lenk, H. 1999. Praxisnahes Philosophieren, Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer GmbH.
21. Lenk, H. and Maring, M. 2001. 'Problems of responsibility in and for technology', in H. Lenk and M. Maring (eds.), Advances and Problems in the Philosophy of Technology (Münster: Lit Verlag), pp. 441-460.
22. Mayr, E. 1961. 'Cause and effect in biology'. Science 134: 1501-6.
23. Mayr, E. 1997. This is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.
24. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25. Popa, R. 2004. Between Necessity and Probability: Searching for the Definition and Origin of Life. Berlin: Springer.
26. Roberts, M. 2009. 'The nonidentity problem', in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopdeia of Philosohy. (Stanford): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonidentity-problem/.
27. Sandler, R. L. 2007. Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
28. Schmidt, M. 2010. 'Xenobiology: a new form of life as the ultimate biosafety tool'. Bioessays 32(4): 322-31.
29. Taylor, P. W. 1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
30. Varner, G. E. 1990. 'Biological Functions and Biological Interests'. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 28(2): 251-270.
31. Varner, G. E. 1998. In Nature's Interests? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Walde, P. 2010. 'Building artificial cells and protocell models: experimental approaches with lipid vesicles'. Bioessays 32(4): 296-303.
33. Weber, B. 2008. 'Life', in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonidentity-problem/.