e-Participation: Comparing Trends in Practice and the Classroom

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 457-475

  Mandarano, Lynn A ^a   Meenar, Mahbubur ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

citizen participation; e participation; planning pedagogy

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PLANNING PRACTICE; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84938997447     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1017933     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. N.Afzalan,, J.S.Evans-Cowley,, & M.Barijough, (2014) From big to little data for natural disaster recovery: how online and on-the-ground activities are connected, Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2526177.
2. S.Arnstein, (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, pp. 216–224.
3. The Association Of Collegiate Schools Of Planning (2012) The Guide to Graduate and Undergraduate Education in Urban and Regional Planning, 17th ed., pp. 12 (Tallahassee, FL: The Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning)
4. D.C.Brabham, (2009) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects, Planning Theory, 8, pp. 242–262.
5. D.C.Brabham, (2013) The four urban governance problem types suitable for crowdsourcing citizen participation, in: C.N.Silva (ed.) Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global)
6. D.C.Brabham,, T.W.Sanchez,, & K.Bartholomew, (2010) Crowdsourcing public participation in transit planning: preliminary results from the next stop design case. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, January 10–14, pp. 1–15 (Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board)
7. S.D.Brody,, D.R.Godschalk,, & R.J.Burby, (2003) Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, pp. 245–264.
8. G.Brown, (2012) Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research, URISA Journal, 25, pp. 7–18.
9. T.A.Bryer,, & K.L.Nelson, (2013) Social media for civic engagement, in: C.N.Silva (ed.) Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity (Hershey PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global)
10. G.Bugs,, C.Granell,, O.Fonts,, J.Huerta,, & M.Painho, (2010) An assessment of public participation GIS and web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil, Cities, 27, pp. 172–181.
11. R.Burby, (2003) Making plans that matter. citizen involvement and government action, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, pp. 33–49.
12. S.Carver,, A.Evans,, R.Kingston,, & I.Turton, (2001) Public participation, GIS and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems, Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, pp. 907–921.
13. City of Davis. ND (2013) DavisWiki. [Online]. Available at http://daviswiki.org/Front_Page (accessed 15 June).
14. S.Connick,, & J.Innes, (2001) Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation (Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development)
15. M.M.Conroy,, & J.Evans-Cowley, (2006) E-participation in planning; an analysis of cities adopting on-line citizen participation tools, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, pp. 371–384.
16. M.M.Conroy,, & J.Evans-Cowley, (2013) Informing and Interacting, Journal of E-Government, 1, pp. 73–92.
17. J.L.Creighton, (2005) The Public Participation Handbook (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass)
18. J.Evans-Cowley, (2010) Planning in the age of Facebook: the role of social networking in planning processes, GeoJournal, 75, pp. 407–420.
19. J.Evans-Cowley,, & M.M.Conroy, (2004) E-Government (Chicago, IL: American Planning Association)
20. J.S.Evans-Cowley,, & G.Griffin, (2012) Micro-participation: community engagement in transportation planning with social media, Transportation Research Record, 8, pp. 90–98.
21. J.Evans-Cowley,, & J.Hollander, (2010) The new generation of public participation: internet-based participation tools, Planning Practice & Research, 25, pp. 397–408.
22. J.Evans-Cowley,, & J.Kitchen, (2011) E-government, Revised ed. (Chicago, IL: American Planning Association)
23. R.Harris, (2010) San Jose Envision 2040 Plan Wikiplanning On-Line Civic Engagement Campaign (Charlotte, NC: Wikiplanning)
24. C.Harrison,, & M.Muklay, (2002) The potential of public geographic systems in UK environmental planning: appraisals by active publics, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45, pp. 841–863.
25. P.Healey, (1997) Collaborative Planning (Vancouver: UBC Press)
26. A.Hudson-Smith,, & A.Crooks, (2008) The renaissance of geographic information: neogeography, gaming and second life, Analysis. CASA Working Papers, pp. 1–16 (London: University College London)
27. J.E.Innes,, & D.E.Booher, (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, pp. 412–423.
28. J.E.Innes,, & D.E.Booher, (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century, Journal of Planning Theory and Practice, 5, pp. 419–436.
29. R.Kingston,, S.Carver,, A.Evans,, & I.Turton, (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, pp. 109–125.
30. L.Mandarano,, M.Meenar,, & C.Steins, (2010) Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement, Journal of Planning Literature, 25, pp. 123–135.
31. M.Meere, (2014) A Planner's Online Toolbox: An Evaluation of Online Tools for Enhancing Public Engagement in the Planning Process (Kingston, ON: School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University)
32. J.A.Obar,, P.Zube,, & C.Lampe, (2012) Advocacy 2.0: an analysis of how advocacy groups in the united states perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action, Journal of Information Policy, 2, pp. 1–25.
33. Planning Accreditation Board (2012) PAB Accreditation Guidelines and Standards (Chicago, IL: Planning Accreditation Board)
34. N.Roberts, (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation, American Review of Public Administration, 34, pp. 325–353.
35. E.Seltzer,, & D.Mahmoudi, (2013) Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: challenges and opportunities for planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 28, pp. 3–18.
36. C.N.Silva, (2013) Open source urban governance: crowdsourcing, neogeography, VGI and citizen science, in: C.N.Silva (ed.) Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global)
37. D.M.Simpson, (2005) Use of web technology by U.S. planning agencies: results from a national benchmarking survey, Municipal Yearbook 2005, pp. 22–26 (Washington DC: International City/County Management Association)
38. E.Stern,, O.Gudes,, & T.Svoray, (2009) Web-based and traditional public participation in comprehensive planning: a comparative study, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, pp. 1067–1085.