The potential of public participation geographic information systems in UK environmental planning: Appraisals by active publics

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 841-863

  Harrison, Carolyn ^a   Haklay, Mordechai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GIS; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; LOCAL PLANNING; PLANNING METHOD;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0141812247     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964056022000024370     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Al-Kodmany, K. (2002) GIS and the artist: shaping the image of a neighborhood in participatory environmental design, in: W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds) Community Participation and Geographic Information System (London, Taylor & Francis).
2. Bedford, T., Clark, J. & Harrison, C. (2002) Limits to public participation practices in local land-use planning, Town Planning Review, 73(3), pp. 311-331.
3. Boott, R., Haklay, M., Heppell, K. & Morley, J. (2001) The use of GIS in brownfield redevelopment, in: P. Halls (Ed) Innovations in GIS 8: Spatial information and the Environment (London, Taylor & Francis).
4. Burgess, R. (1984) In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research (London, Routledge).
5. Carver, S., (2001) Public participation using web-based GIS, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, pp. 803-804.
6. Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R. & Torton, I. (2001) Public participation, GIS and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, pp. 907-921.
7. Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M. & Weiner, D. (2002a) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (London, Taylor & Francis).
8. Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M. & Weiner, D. (2002b) Conclusion, in: W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (2002) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (London, Taylor & Francis).
9. Cullingworth, B. (1993) The Political Culture of Planning: American Land Use Planning in Comparative Perspective (London, Routledge).
10. Curry, M.R. (1998) Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies (New York, Routledge).
11. Davis, A.R. (2001) Hidden or hiding? Public perceptions of participation in the planning system, Town and Planning Review, 72(2), pp. 193-199.
12. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1998a) Modernising Planning (London, DETR).
13. DETR (1998b) Modern Local Government: In Touch with the People, Cm. 4014 (London, DETR).
14. DETR (2001) On the path to e-government-council pathfinders picked, news release 164, 22 March (London, DETR).
15. DTLR (2001) Planning: Delivering a Fundamental Change (London, DTLR).
16. DTLR (2002) Planning Green Paper (London, DTLR).
17. Doyle, S., Dodge, M. & Smith, A. (1998) The potential of web-based mapping and virtual reality technologies for modelling urban environments, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(2), pp. 137-155.
18. Elwood, S. & Leitner, H. (1998) GIS and community-based planning: exploring the diversity of neighbourhood perspectives and need, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25, pp. 77-88.
19. Ghose, R. (2001) Use of information technology for community empowerment: transforming geographic information systems into community information systems, Transactions in GIS, 5(2), pp. 141-163.
20. Ghose, R. & Huxhold, W.E. (2001) Role of local contextual factors in building public participation GIS: the Milwaukee experience, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28(3), pp. 195-208.
21. Gottsegen, J. (1998) Assessing the interests and perceptions of stakeholders in environmental debates through argumentation analysis, paper presented to the international seminar, 'Groupware pour la Planification Urbaine. Jeudi 5 Fevrier 1998 COST-UCE C4 Genie Civil Urbain-Systeme d'Information', Lyon, France.
22. Haklay, M. (in press) Public access to environmental information: past, present and future, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems (in press).
23. Harris, T. & Weiner, D. (1998) Empowerment, marginalisation and community-integrated GIS, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25, pp. 67-76.
24. Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Basingstoke, Macmillan).
25. Horita, M. (2000) Mapping policy discourse with CRANES: spatial understanding support systems as a medium for community conflict resolution, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(6), pp. 801-814.
26. Hudson-Smith, A. & Evens, S. (2002) A collaborative three dimensional geographic information system for London: phase I-Woodbery Down, in: D. Kidner & G. Higgs (Eds) Socio-economic Applications of Geographic Information Science (London, Taylor & Francis).
27. Jankowski, P. & Nyerges, T. (2001) Geographic Information Systems for Group Decision Making (London, Taylor & Francis).
28. Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A. & Turton, I. (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environment decision-making, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(2), pp. 109-125.
29. Krygier, J.B. (2002) The praxis of public participation GIS and visualization, in: W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (2002) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (London, Taylor & Francis).
30. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. & Stoker, G. (2001) Trends in public participation: part 1-local government perspectives, Public Administration, 79(1), pp. 205-222.
31. National Centre for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA) (1998) Empowerment, marginalization and public participation GIS, papers presented at a specialist meeting, Santa Barbara, CA, 14-17 October (http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/ppgis/papers/index.html).
32. Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D. & George, J.F. (1991) Electronic meeting systems, Communications of the ACM, 34(7), pp. 40-61.
33. Obermeyer, N.J. (1998) The evolution of public participation GIS, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25, pp. 65-66.
34. O'Neill, O. (2002) A question of trust, Reith Lecture 2002, British Broadcasting Corporation.
35. Pickles, J. (1995) Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems (New York, Guilford Press).
36. Pipes, S. & Maguire, F. (1997) Behind the green door, Mapping Awareness, 11, pp. 28-29.
37. Reeve, D., Thommason, E., Scott, S. & Simpson, L. (2002) Engaging citizens: the Bedford community statistics project, paper presented at GIS Research UK 2002, Sheffield, 3-5 April.
38. Rydin, Y. & Pennington, M. (2000) Public participation and local environmental planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social capital, Local Environment, 5(2), pp. 152-169.
39. Sawicki, D.S. & Craig, W.J. (1996) The democratization of data: bridging the gap for community groups, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), pp. 512-523.
40. Schroeder, P. (1997) GIS in public participation settings, paper presented at University Consortium for Geographic Information Science 1997 Annual Assembly and Summer Retreat, Bar Harbor, MN, 15-21 June (http://www.spatial.maine.edu/ucgis/testproc/schroeder/UCGISDFT.HTM) (accessed 17 May 2001).
41. Selman, P. & Parker, J. (1997) Citizenship, civicness and social capital in Local Agenda 21, Local Environment, 2(2), pp. 171-184.
42. Sheppard, E. (1995) GIS and society: towards a research agenda, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22, pp. 5-16.
43. Shiffer, M.J. (1995a) Environmental review with hypermedia systems, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, pp. 359-372.
44. Shiffer, M.J. (1995b) Interactive multimedia planning support: moving from stand-alone systems to the World Wide Web, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, pp. 649-664.
45. Sieber, R.E. (2000a) GIS implementation in the grassroots, Urban and Regional Information Systems Association Journal, 12, pp. 15-29.
46. Sieber, R.E. (2000b) Conforming (to) the opposition: the social construction of geographical information systems in social movements, International Journal of Geographical information Science, 14(8), pp. 775-793.
47. Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (London, Sage).
48. Talen, E. (1999) Constructing neighbourhoods from the bottom up: the case for resident-generated GIS, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, pp. 533-554.
49. Talen, E. (2000) Bottom-up GIS: a new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), pp. 279-294.
50. Tewdwr-Jones, M. & Allmendinger, P. (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning, Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1975-1989.
51. Thomas, H. (1996) Public participation in planning, in: M. Tewdwr-Jones; (Ed) British Planning Policy in Transition: Planning in the 1990s (London, UCL Press).
52. Weiner, D., Harris, T.M. & Craig, W.J. (2002) Community participation and geographic information systems, in: W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (London, Taylor & Francis).
53. Wilson, D. (1999) Exploring the limits of public participation in local government, Parliamentary Affairs, 52(2), pp. 246-259.
54. Young, S. (2000) Participation strategies and local environmental politics: Local Agenda 21, in: G. Stoker (Ed) The New Politics of British Local Governance (London, Macmillan).