Revisiting Haavelmo's structural econometrics: bridging the gap between theory and data

Journal of Economic Methodology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 171-196

  Spanos, Aris ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DSGE modeling; Haavelmo; misspecification testing; respectification; statistical misspecification; statistical vs. structural models; statistical vs. substantive adequacy; textbook econometrics; unreliability of inference

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938951834     PISSN: 1350178X     EISSN: 14699427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2015.1035946     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. O.Bjerkholt, (2005). Frisch's econometric laboratory and the rise of Trygve Haavelmo's probability approach. Econometric Theory, 21, 491–533. doi:10.1017/S0266466605050309.
2. O.Bjerkholt, (2007). Writing ‘The Probability Approach’ with nowhere to go: Haavelmo in the United States, 1939–1944. Econometric Theory, 23, 775–837. doi:10.1017/S026646660707034X.
3. M.Boumans, (2010). The problem of passive observation. History of Political Economy, 42, 75–110. doi:10.1215/00182702-2009-063.
4. M.Boumans,, & J.B.Davis, (2010). Economic methodology: Understanding economics as a science. London: Palgrave, Macmillan.
5. A.F.Burns,, & W.C.Mitchell, (1946). Measuring the business cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6. F.Canova, (2007). Method for applied macroeconomic research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. R.L.Cooper, (1972). The predictive performance of quarterly econometric models of the United States. In B.G.Hickman (Ed.), Econometric models of cyclical behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. D.N.DeJong,, & C.Dave, (2011). Structural macroeconometrics (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Unversity Press.
9. J.L.Doob, (1953). Stochastic processes. New York, NY: Wiley.
10. R.M.Edge,, & R.S.Gürkaynak, (2010). How useful are estimated DSGE model forecasts for central bankers? Brookings Papers, 2010, 209–244. doi:10.1353/eca.2010.0015.
11. R.J.Epstein, (1987). A history of econometrics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
12. R.A.Fisher, (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 222, 309–368. doi:10.1098/rsta.1922.0009.
13. M.Friedman, (1940). Review of ‘Business Cycles in the United States of America, 1919–1932, by J. Tinbergen. The American Economic Review, 30, 657–660.
14. M.Friedman, (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in Positive Economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
15. R.Frisch, (1933). Propagation problems and impulse problems in dynamic economics. In Economic essays in honour of Gustav Cassel. London: Allen & Unwin.
16. R.Frisch, (1934). Statistical confluence analysis by means of complete regression schemes. Oslo: Universitetets Okonomiske Institutt.
17. G.Fromm,, & L.R.Klein, (Eds.). (1975). Brookings model: Perspective and recent developments. North Holland: Elsevier.
18. L.G.Godfrey, (1988). Misspecification tests in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. A.S.Goldberger, (1964). Econometric theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
20. C.W.J.Granger,, & P.Newbold, (1986). Forecasting economic time series (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
21. W.H.Greene, (2011). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. F.Guala, (2005). The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. T.Haavelmo, (1940). The inadequacy of testing dynamic theory by comparing theoretical solutions and observed cycles. Econometrica, 8, 312–321. doi:10.2307/1906882.
24. T.Haavelmo, (1943a). The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica, 11(1), 1–12. doi:10.2307/1905714.
25. T.Haavelmo, (1943b). Statistical testing of business-cycle theories. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 25, 13–18. doi:10.2307/1924542.
26. T.Haavelmo, (1944). The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica, 12(supplement), 1–115. doi:10.2307/1906935.
27. T.Haavelmo, (1956). Equations vs. identities in macroeconomics (in Norwegian). In R.Bentzel (Ed.), 25 Economics essays in honour of Erik Lindahl. (O. Bjerkholt and J. Vislie, Trans.). Stockholm, Sweden: Ekonomisk Tidskrift.
28. T.Haavelmo, (1958). The role of the econometrician in the advancement of economic theory. Econometrica, 26, 351–357.
29. T.Haavelmo, (1989). Econometrics and the welfare state, Nobel lecture, reprinted in The American Economic Review, 87, 13–15.
30. G.Haberler, (1937). Prosperity and depression. Geneva: League of Nations.
31. J.J.Heckman, (1992). Haavelmo and the birth of modern econometrics: A review of the historyof econometric ideas by Mary Morgan. Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 876–886.
32. D.F.Hendry, (1976). The structure of simultaneous equations estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 4, 51–88. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(76)90017-8.
33. D.F.Hendry, (1979). Predictive failure and econonometric modeling in macro-economics', the transactions demand for money. In P.Ormerod (Ed.), Economic Modeling (pp. 217–242). London: Heinemann.
34. D.F.Hendry, (1980). Econometrics-alchemy or science? Economica, 47, 387–406; reprinted in Hendry, D. F. (2000). Econometrics: Alchemy or science? Oxford: Blackwell.
35. D.F.Hendry, (2009). The methodology and philosophy of applied econometrics. In T.C.Mills & K.Patterson (Eds.), New Palgrave handbook of econometrics, vol. 2: Applied econometrics (pp. 3–67). London: Macmillan.
36. D.F.Hendry,, & M.S.Morgan, (Eds.). (1995). The foundations of econometric analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. D.F.Hendry,, A.Spanos,, & N.R.Ericsson, (1989). The contributions to econometrics in Trygve Haavelmo's ‘the probability approach to econometrics’. Sosialøkonomen, 43, 12–17.
38. K.D.Hoover, (1995). Facts and artifacts: Calibration and the empirical assessment of real-business-cycle models. Oxford Economic Papers, 47, 24–44.
39. K.D.Hoover, (2001). Causality in macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. K.D.Hoover, (2014). On the reception of Haavelmo's econometric thought. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 36, 45–65.
41. P.N.Ireland, (2004). Technology shocks in the new Keynesian model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 923–936. doi:10.1162/0034653043125158.
42. J.Johnston, (1963). Econometric methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43. J.M.Keynes, (1939). Relative movements of real wages and output. Economic Journal, 49, 34–568. doi:10.2307/2225182.
44. D.R.Klein,, & A.S.Goldberger, (1955). Econometric model of the United States, 1929–52. North Holland: Elsevier.
45. A.N.Kolmogorov, (1933). Foundations of the theory of probability (2nd English edition). New York, NY: Chelsea.
46. T.C.Koopmans, (1938). Linear regression analysis of economic time series. Netherlands Economic Institute, Publication No. 20, Haarlem, F. Bohn.
47. T.C.Koopmans, (Ed.). (1950). Statistical inference in dynamic economic models, Cowles Commission Monograph, No. 10. New York, NY: Wiley.
48. F.E.Kydland,, & E.C.Prescott, (1991). The econometrics of the general equilibrium approach to business cycles. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93, 161–178. doi:10.2307/3440324.
49. R.E.Lucas, (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In K.Brunner & A.M.Metzer (Eds.), The Phillips curve and labour markets (pp. 19–46), Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy I. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
50. R.E.Lucas, (1980). Methods and problems in business cycle theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12, 696–715. doi:10.2307/1992030.
51. R.E.Lucas,, & T.J.Sargent, (1981). Rational expectations and econometric practice. London: George Allen & Unwin.
52. U.Mäki, (1998). Realisticness. In J. B. Davis, D. W. Hands & U. Mäki (Eds.), The handbook of economic methodology (pp. 409–413). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
53. U.Mäki, (2009). The methodology of positive economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. H.Mann,, & A.Wald, (1943). On the statistical treatment of linear stochastic difference equations. Econometrica, 11, 173–220. doi:10.2307/1905674.
55. L.Matyas, (Ed.). (1999). Generalized method of moments estimation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. D.G.Mayo,, & A.Spanos, (2004). Methodology in practice: Statistical misspecification testing. Philosophy of Science, 71, 1007–1025. doi:10.1086/425064.
57. D.G.Mayo,, & A.Spanos, (2006). Severe testing as a basic concept in a Neyman–Pearson philosophy of induction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 323–357. doi:10.1093/bjps/axl003.
58. D.G.Mayo,, & A.Spanos, (2011). Error statistics. In D.Gabbay, P.Thagard, & J.Woods (Eds.), The handbook of philosophy of science, vol. 7: Philosophy of statistics (pp. 151–196). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
59. M.D.McCarthy, (1972). The Wharton quarterly econometric forecasting model Mark III, Economic Research Unit, Department of Economics, Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, University of Pennsylvania.
60. A.McGuirk,, J.Robertson,, & A.Spanos, (1993). Modeling exchange rate dynamics: non-linear dependence and thick tails. Econometric Reviews, 12, 33–63. doi:10.1080/07474939308800253.
61. A.McGuirk,, & A.Spanos, (2009). Revisiting error-autocorrelation correction: Common factor restrictions and granger non-causality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71, 273–294. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00538.x.
62. W.C.Mitchell, (1913). Business cycles and their causes (Vol. 3). Berkeley: California University Memoirs.
63. M.S.Morgan, (1990). The history of econometric ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. C.R.Nelson, (1972). The prediction performance of the FRB - MIT- PENN model of the U.S. Economy. American Economic Review, 62, 902–917.
65. J.Neyman, (1937). Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Statistical Society of London, A, 236, 333–380. doi:10.1098/rsta.1937.0005.
66. J.Neyman, (1937/1952). Lectures and conferences on mathematical statistics and probability (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
67. J.Neyman,, & E.S.Pearson, (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 231, 289–337. doi:10.1098/rsta.1933.0009.
68. P.C.B.Phillips, (2005). Automated discovery in econometrics. Econometric Theory, 21, 3–20.
69. N.Poudyal,, & A.Spanos, (2013). Model validation and DSGE modeling. Economics Department, Virginia Tech working paper, Blacksburg, VA.
70. E.C.Prescott, (1986). Theory ahead of business cycle measurement. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 10, 9–22.
71. D.Qin, (1993). The formation of econometrics: A historical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. J.P.Romano,, & A.F.Siegel, (1986). Counterexamples in probability and statistics. Belmont: Wadsworth.
73. C.A.Sims, (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1–48. doi:10.2307/1912017.
74. A.Spanos, (1989). On re-reading Haavelmo: A retrospective view of econometric modeling. Econometric Theory, 5, 405–429. doi:10.1017/S0266466600012597.
75. A.Spanos, (1990). The simultaneous-equations model revisited. Journal of Econometrics, 44, 87–105. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90074-4.
76. A.Spanos, (1995). On normality and the linear regression model. Econometric Reviews, 14, 195–203. doi:10.1080/07474939508800314.
77. A.Spanos, (1999). Probability theory and statistical inference: Econometric modeling with observational data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. A.Spanos, (2006a). Revisiting the omitted variables argument: Substantive vs. statistical adequacy. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13, 179–218. doi:10.1080/13501780600730687.
79. A.Spanos, (2006b). Where do statistical models come from? Revisiting the problem of specification. In J.Rojo(Ed.), Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, vol. 49Optimality: The second Erich L. Lehmann Symposium (pp. 98–119). Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
80. A.Spanos, (2009). Statistical misspecification and the reliability of inference: The simple t-test in the presence of Markov dependence. The Korean Economic Review, 25, 165–213.
81. A.Spanos, (2010a). Akaike-type criteria and the reliability of inference: Model selection versus statistical model specification. Journal of Econometrics, 158, 204–220. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.01.011.
82. A.Spanos, (2010b). Statistical adequacy and the trustworthiness of empirical evidence: Statistical vs. substantive information. Economic Modelling, 27, 1436–1452. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2010.07.007.
83. A.Spanos, (2010c). Theory testing in economics and the error statistical perspective. In D.G.Mayo & A.Spanos (Eds.), Error and inference: Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability and the objectivity and rationality of science (pp. 202–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. A.Spanos, (2012). Philosophy of econometrics. In U.Maki (Ed.), in the series Handbook of Philosophy of Science, D. Gabbay, P. Thagard, and J. Woods(Eds.), Philosophy of Economics (pp. 329–393). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
85. A.Spanos, (2014). Reflections on the LSE Tradition in econometrics: A student's perspective. OEconomia, History of Econometrics, 4, 343–380.
86. A.Spanos,, & A.McGuirk, (2001). Econometric methodologies for the model specification problem: Addressing old problems in the new century: The model specification problem from a probabilistic reduction perspective. Journal of the American Agricultural Association, 83, 1168–1176. doi:10.1111/0002-9092.00262.
87. J.Tinbergen, (1939). Statistical testing of business cycle research, 2 vols. Geneva: League of Nations.
88. J.M.Wooldridge, (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
89. G.U.Yule, (1926). Why do we sometimes get nonsense-correlations between time-series?–A study in sampling and the nature of time-series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 89(1), 1–64. doi:10.2307/2341482.