Methodology in practice: Statistical misspecification testing

Philosophy of Science

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1007-1025

  Mayo, Deborah G ^a   Spanos, Aris ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19944418529     PISSN: 00318248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/425064     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Forster, Malcolm R. (2001), "The New Science of Simplicity", in Arnold Zellner, Hugo A. Keuzenkamp, and Michael McAleer (eds.), Simplicity, Inference and Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 83-119.
2. Forster, Malcolm R., and Elliott Sober (1994), "How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 1-35.
3. Glymour, Clark (1997), "A Review of Recent Work on the Foundations of Causal Inference", in McKim and Turner (1997).
4. Levene, Howard (1952), "On the Power Function of Tests of Randomness Based on Runs Up and Down", Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23: 34-56.
5. Mayo, Deborah G. (1991), "Novel Evidence and Severe Tests", Philosophy of Science 58: 523-552.
6. _ (1996), Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Mayo, Deborah G., and Aris Spanos (2000), "A Post-data Interpretation of Neyman-Pearson Methods Based on a Conception of Severe Testing", Measurements in Physics and Economics Discussion Paper Series, History and Methodology of Economics Group. London School of Economics and Political Science, Tymes Court, London.
8. McKim, Vaughn R., and Stephen P. Turner (eds.) (1997), Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
9. Mizon, Graham E. (1995), "A Simple Message for Autocorrelation Correctors: Don't", Journal of Econometrics 69: 267-288.
10. Spanos, Aris (1986), Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. _ (1989), "On Re-reading Haavelmo: A Retrospective View of Econometric Modeling", Econometric Theory 5: 405-429.
12. _ (1995), "On Theory Testing in Econometrics: Modeling with Nonexperimental Data", Journal of Econometrics 67: 189-226.
13. _ (1999), Probability Theory and Statistical Inference: Econometric Modeling with Observational Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. _ (2000), "Revisiting Data Mining: 'Hunting' with or without a License", The Journal of Economic. Methodology 7: 231-264.
15. Spirtes, Peter, Clark Glymour, and Richard Schemes (2001), Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Woodward, James (1988), "Understanding Regression", in Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin (eds.), PSA 88, vol. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 255-269.
17. Yule, Udny (1895), "On the Correlation of Total Pauperism and the Proportion of Out Relief, Economic Journal 5: 603-611.