Strategies to use tablet computers for collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Schick Makaroff, Kara ^a   Molzahn, Anita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electronic patient reported outcomes; ePRO; iPad; Nursing; Tablet computers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; COMPUTER; COMPUTER SECURITY; EDMONTON SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SCALE; ELECTRONIC PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KIDNEY DISEASE QUALITY OF LIFE 36; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; TABLET COMPUTER; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SELF REPORT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION;

COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL DIALYSIS; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84938928553     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-014-0205-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Basch E, Goldfarb S. Electronic patient-reported outcomes for collecting sensitive information from patients. J Support Oncol. 2009;7:98-9.
2. Dupont A, Wheeler J, Herndon II JE, Coan A, Zafar SY, Hood L, et al. Use of tablet personal computers for sensitive patient-reported information. J Support Oncol. 2009;7:91-7.
3. Smith SK, Rowe K, Abernethy AP. Use of an electronic patient-reported outcome measurement system to improve distress management in oncology. Palliat Support Care. 2014;12:69-73.
4. Zbrozek A, Hebert J, Gogates G, Thorell R, Dell C, Molsen E, et al. Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data - Recommendations for clinical trial teams: Report of the ISPOR ePRO Systems Validation Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16:48-489.
5. Abernethy AP, Ahmad A, Zafar SY, Wheeler JL, Reese JB, Lynerly HK. Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Med Care. 2010;48 Suppl 1:S32-8.
6. Bennett AV, Jensen RE, Basch E. Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA-Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:337-47.
7. Chang Y-J, Chang C-H, Peng C-L, Wu H-C, Lin H-C, Wang J-Y, et al. Measurement equivalence and feasibility of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: paper-and-pencil versus touch-screen administration. Health Qual Life Out. 2014;12:1-10.
8. Coons SJ. ePRO systems validation: Clearly defining the roles of clinical trial teams and ePRO system providers. Value Health. 2013;16:457-8.
9. Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value Health. 2009;12:419-29.
10. Dy SM, Roy J, Ott GE, McHale M, Kennedy C, Kutner JS, et al. Tell Us™: A web-based tool for improving communication among patients, families, and providers in hospice and palliative care through systematic data specification, collection and use. J Pain Symptom. 2011;42:526-34.
11. Espallargues M, Valderas JM, Alonso J. Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care. 2000;38:175-86.
12. Holzner B, Giesinger JM, Pinggera J, Zugal S, Schöpf F, Oberguggenberger AS, et al. The computer-based health evaluation software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:126-37.
13. Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MH, et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1305-14.
14. Schick-Makaroff K, Molzahn A. Use of iPads to assess health-related quality of life: a feasibility study in outpatient home dialysis clinics. CJKHD 2014, 1. doi:10.1186/s40697-014-0022-9
15. Ashley L, Jones H, Forman D, Newsham A, Brown J, Downing A, et al. Feasibility test of a UK-scalable electronic system for regular collection of patient-reported outcome measures and linkage with clinical cancer registry data: the electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:1-10.
16. Ashley L, Jones H, Thomas J, Newsham A, Downing A, Morris E, et al. Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e230.
17. Brundage M, Blazeby J, Revicki D, Bass B, de Vet H, Duffy H, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1161-75.
18. Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, Revicki DA, Moher D, Brundage MD, et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;309:814-22.
19. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, Velikova G, Terwee CB, Snyder CF, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1889-905.
20. Basch E, Iasonos A, Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, Artz D, et al. Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. JCO. 2007;25:5374-80.
21. Davison SN, Jhandri GS, Johnson JA. Cross-sectional validity of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system in dialysis patients: a simple assessment of symptom burden. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1621-5.
22. Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB. Development of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:329-38.
23. Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) Complete [ http://www.kdqol-complete.org/ ]
24. Thorne S. Interpretive Description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2008.
25. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res. 2003;13:905-23.