Electronic patient-reported outcomes for collecting sensitive information from patients

Journal of Supportive Oncology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 98-99

  Basch, Ethan ^a   Goldfard, Shari ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CANCER PATIENT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; REGISTRATION; SELF REPORT; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SEXUALITY; COMPUTER; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

COMPUTERS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS;

EID: 68249138821     PISSN: 15446794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Abernethy AP, Herndon JE 2nd, Wheeler JL, et al. Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data. Health Serv Res 2008;431975-1991.
2. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:714-724.
3. US Food and Drug Administration. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. www.fda.gov/ Cber/gdlns/prolbl.htm. Accessed April 2, 2009.
4. Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report. Value in Health 2008. [published online ahead of print: November 11, 2008].
5. Basch E, Artz D, Iasonos A, et al. Evaluation of an online platform for cancer patient self-reporting of chemotherapy toxicities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:264-268.
6. PRO-CTCAE Investigators. White paper on barriers and strategies for implementation of a patient-reported version of the CTCAE (version 6, March 27, 2009). National Cancer Institute Wiki. www.wiki.nci.nih.gov/ pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=10858335. Accessed April 2, 2009.
7. Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE. Life after breast cancer: understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:501-514.
8. Moinpour CM, Darke AK, Donaldson GW, et al. Longitudinal analysis of sexual function reported by men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1025-1035.
9. Talcott JA, Rieker P, Propert KJ, et al. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1117-1123.
10. Goldfarb S, Dickler M, Sit L, et al. Sexual dysfunction in women with breast cancer: prevalence and severity. Poster to be presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; May 29-June 2, 2009; Orlando, Florida (Abstract 9558).
11. Nielsen//NetRatings. U.S. broadband composition reaches 72 percent at home, a 15 point year-over-year increase. www.nielsen-online.com/pr/ pr_060621.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2009.