The role of values in methodological controversies: The case of risk assessment

Philosophia Scientiae

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 45-56

  Luján, José Luis ^a   Todt, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938916090     PISSN: 12812463     EISSN: 17754283     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Barnes, Barry [1982], T. S. Kuhn and Social Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Collins, Harry M. [1983], An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of Scientific knowledge, in: Science Observed, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay, Bristol: Sage, 85-114.
3. Cranor, Carl F. [1994], Public health research and uncertainty, in: Ethics of Scientific Research, edited by K. Shrader-Frechette, Lanham: Rowman & Littleeld, 169-185.
4. Cranor, Carl F. [1997], The normative nature of risk assessment: Features and possibilities, Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 8, 123-136.
5. Cranor, Carl F. [2011], Legally Poisoned: How the Law Puts Us at Risk from Toxicants, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Douglas, Heather [2009], Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
7. Douglas, Mary & Wildavsky, Aaron [1982], Risk and Culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers, Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. European Commission [2001], Council Directive 2001/18/EC (12/3/2001) on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modi-ed organisms, Official Journal of the European Communities, 1106.
9. European Parliament and Council [2006], Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of 18/12/2006, concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals, Official Journal of the European Communities, 1136, 3-280.
10. Haack, Susan [2008], Proving causation: The holism of warrant and the atomism of Daubert, Journal of Health & Biomedical Law, 4, 253-289.
11. Harremoës, Poul et al. [2002], The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings, London: Earthscan.
12. Jasanoff, Sheila [1990], The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policy Makers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Jeffrey, Richard [1956], Valuation and acceptance of Scientific hypotheses, Philosophy of Science, 23, 237-246.
14. Klinke, Andreas, Dreyer, Marion, Renn, Ortwin, Stirling, Andrew, & Van Zwanenberg, Patrick [2006], Precautionary risk regulation in European governance, Journal of Risk Research, 9(4), 373-392, doi:10.1080/13669870600715800.
15. Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. & Mulkay, Michael [1983], Introduction: Emerging principles in social studies, in: Science Observed, edited by K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay, Bristol: Sage, 1-17.
16. Koch, Lars & Ashford, Nicholas A. [2006], Rethinking the role of information in chemicals policy: implications for TSCA and REACH, Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(1), 31-46, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.06.003.
17. Kuhn, Thomas S. [1977], Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice, in: The Essential Tension, edited by T. S. Kuhn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 320-339.
18. Laudan, Larry [1984], Science and Values, Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. Laudan, Larry [2008], Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Laudan, Larry [2014], Is it -nally time to put 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt' out to pasture?, in: Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law, edited by A. Marmour, London: Routledge, 317-332.
21. Longino, Helen E. [1990], Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22. Luján, José Luis [2005], MetaScientific analysis and methodological learning in regulatory science, in: Science, Technology and Society: A Philosophical Perspective, edited by W. González, La Coruña: Netbiblo, 83-106.
23. Luján, José Luis & Todt, Oliver [2012], Precaution: A taxonomy, Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 143-157, doi:10.1177/0306312711431836.
24. Machamer, Peter & Wolters, Gereon [2004], Science, Values and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
25. McMullin, Ernan [1983], Values in science, in: Proceedings of the 1982 PSA, East Lansing, MI: PSA, 3-28.
26. Mitchell, Sandra [2004], The prescribed and proscribed values in science policy, in: Science, Values and Objectivity, edited by Peter Machamer & Gereon Wolters, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 245-255.
27. Rudner, Richard [1953], The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments, Philosophy of Science, 20, 1-6.
28. Shrader-Frechette, Kristin [2004], Using metascience to improve doseresponse curves in biology: Better policy through better science, Philosophy of Science, 71, 1026-1037.
29. Todt, Oliver & Luján, José Luis [2008], A new social contract for technology? - On the policy dynamics of uncertainty, Journal of Risk Research, 11(4), 509-523, doi:10.1080/13669870701875735.
30. Todt, Oliver & Luján, José Luis [2014], Values and decisions: Cognitive and noncognitive values in knowledge generation and decision making, Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(5), 720-743, doi:10.1177/0162243914521019.
31. Todt, Oliver, Muñoz, Emilio, González, Marta, Ponce, Gloria, & Estévez, Betty [2009], Consumer attitudes and the governance of food safety, Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), 103-114, doi:10.1177/0963662507078019.
32. Todt, Oliver, Rodríguez Alcázar, Javier, & Luján, José Luis [2010], Practical values and uncertainty in regulatory decision-making, Social Epistemology, 24(4), 349-362, doi:10.1080/02691728.2010.506961.
33. Wandall, Birgitte [2004], Values in science and risk assessment, Toxicology Letters, 152(3), 265-272, doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.05.010.
34. Wilholt, Torsten [2009], Bias and values in Scientific research, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science - Part A, 40(1), 92-101, doi:10.1016/j. shpsa.2008.12.005.
35. Worrall, John [1988], The value of a -xed methodology, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39(2), 263-275, doi:10.1093/bjps/39.2.263.
36. Wynne, Brian [1992], Risk and social learning: Rei-cation to engagement, in: Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky & D. Golding, Westport: Praeger, 275-300.