Early postoperative outcomes in lumpectomy versus simple mastectomy

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 198, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 143-148

  Chatterjee, Abhishek ^a   Pyfer, Bryan ^b   Czerniecki, Brian ^a   Rosenkranz, Kari ^b   Tchou, Julia ^a   Fisher, Carla ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Lumpectomy; NSQIP; Outcomes; Postoperative; Simple mastectomy

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COMA; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND COMPLICATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MASTECTOMY, SIMPLE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 84938740328     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.054     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. B. Fisher, C. Redmond, R. Poisson, and et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer N Engl J Med 320 1989 822
2. U. Veronesi, N. Cascinelli, L. Mariani, and et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 2002 1227
3. M. Clarke, R. Collins, S. Darby, and et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials Lancet 366 2005 2087
4. B. Fisher, S. Anderson, J. Bryant, and et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 2002 1233
5. E.D. Collins, C.P. Moore, K.F. Clay, and et al. Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? J Clin Oncol 27 2009 519
6. J. Chen, Z. Gutkin, and J. Bawnik Postoperative infections in breast surgery J Hosp Infect 17 1991 61
7. J.D. Beatty, G.V. Robinson, J.A. Zaia, and et al. A prospective analysis of nosocomial wound infection after mastectomy Arch Surg 118 1983 1421
8. C. Rotstein, R. Ferguson, K.M. Cummings, and et al. Determinants of clean surgical wound infections for breast procedures at an oncology center Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13 1992 207
9. R.G. Somers, L.K. Jablon, M.J. Kaplan, and et al. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer. A prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 215 1992 146
10. M.M. Poggi, D.N. Danforth, L.C. Sciuto, and et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute randomized trial Cancer 98 2003 697
11. M. Blichert-Toft, M. Nielsen, M. During, and et al. Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG-82TM protocol Acta Oncol 47 2008 672
12. R. Arriagada, M.G. Le, J.M. Guinebretiere, and et al. Late local recurrences in a randomised trial comparing conservative treatment with total mastectomy in early breast cancer patients Ann Oncol 14 2003 1617
13. J.M. McGreevy, P.P. Goodney, C.M. Birkmeyer, and et al. A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs Surg Endosc 17 2003 1778
14. P.J. Guillou, P. Quirke, H. Thorpe, and et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 365 2005 1718
15. K.P. McGuire, A.A. Santillan, P. Kaur, and et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients Ann Surg Oncol 16 2009 2682
16. R. Katipamula, A.C. Degnim, T. Hoskin, and et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging J Clin Oncol 27 2009 4082
17. J.F. Waljee, M.A. Rogers, and A.K. Alderman Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J Clin Oncol 25 2007 1067
18. A. Chatterjee, D. Ramkumar, T.B. Dawli, and et al. The use of mesh versus primary fascial closure of the abdominal donor site when using a transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction: a cost-utility analysis Plast Reconstr Surg 134 4 Suppl 1 2014 26
19. A.C. Offodile 2nd, A. Chatterjee, S. Vallejo, and et al. A cost-utility analysis of the use of preoperative computed tomographic-angiography in abdomen-based perforator flap breast reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 2014 [Epub ahead of print]
20. A. Chatterjee, N.M. Krishnan, and J.M. Rosen Complex ventral hernia repair using components separation with or without biologic mesh: a cost-utility analysis Ann Plast Surg 2013 [Epub ahead of print]
21. A. Chatterjee, N.M. Krishnan, and J.M. Rosen Complex ventral hernia repair using components separation with or without synthetic mesh: a cost-utility analysis Plast Reconstr Surg 133 2014 137
22. A. Chatterjee, N.M. Krishnan, M.M. Van Vliet, and et al. A comparison of free autologous breast reconstruction with and without the use of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography: a cost-effectiveness analysis Plast Reconstr Surg 131 2013 693e
23. N.M. Krishnan, A. Chatterjee, K.M. Rosenkranz, and et al. The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67 2014 468
24. N.M. Krishnan, A. Chatterjee, M.M. Van Vliet, and et al. A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis Plast Reconstr Surg 131 2013 953
25. F. Osman, F. Saleh, T.D. Jackson, and et al. Increased postoperative complications in bilateral mastectomy patients compared to unilateral mastectomy: an analysis of the NSQIP database Ann Surg Oncol 20 2013 3212
26. D.L. Eck, S.L. Koonce, R.F. Goldberg, and et al. Breast surgery outcomes as quality measures according to the NSQIP database Ann Surg Oncol 19 2012 3212
27. M.R. Decker, D.Y. Greenblatt, J. Havlena, and et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on wound complications after breast surgery Surgery 152 2012 382
28. A.M. Ibrahim, M. Shuster, P.G. Koolen, and et al. Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix Plast Reconstr Surg 132 2013 1057