The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 468-476

  Krishnan, Naveen M ^a   Chatterjee, Abhishek ^b   Rosenkranz, Kari M ^b   Powell, Stephen G ^c   Nigriny, John F ^b   Vidal, Dale C ^b  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acellular dermal matrix; Cost effectiveness analysis

Indexed keywords

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ARTICLE; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; TISSUE EXPANSION;

EID: 84896313406     PISSN: 17486815     EISSN: 18780539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.035     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Surgeons ASoP. Reconstructive breast surgery statistics; 2010.
2. Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg;129: 1049-1058.
3. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, et al. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg;127:1755-1762.
4. de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, et al. Cost AnAlysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg.
5. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg;128:403e-10e.
6. Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, et al. The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study. Plast Reconstr Surg;129:901e-08e.
7. Statistics NCfH. Death in the United States, 2010; 2010.
8. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg;125:1606-1614.
9. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/- implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg;64 :674-678.
10. Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1743-53.
11. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to- head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:1735-40.
12. Hanna KR, Degeorge BR, Jr., Mericli AF, Lin KY, Drake DB. Comparison StUdy of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Ann Plast Surg.
13. Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ. The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg 2008;60:510-3. (Pubitemid 351591458)
14. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E,Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:418-25.
15. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, et al. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg;128: 1170-1178.
16. Thoma A, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Veltri K. Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2003;23:287-95. (Pubitemid 37093594)
17. Thoma A, Veltri K, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Duku E. Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in post-mastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1650-61. (Pubitemid 39201794)
18. Grosse SD. Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold. Expert Rev Pharm Outcomes Res 2008;8:165-78. (Pubitemid 351959547)
19. Vernon JA, Payette M, Chatterjee A. Social welfare and adolescent vaccination programs in the United States: the economic opportunities for a systematic expansion. Soc Work Public Health 2009;24:414-45.
20. Weichman KE, Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, et al. Unilateral preoperative chest wall irradiation in bilateral tissue expander breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a prospective outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg;131:921-927.