Complex Ventral Hernia Repair Using Components Separation with or Without Biologic Mesh: A Cost-Utility Analysis

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 471-478

  Chatterjee, Abhishek ^a   Krishnan, Naveen M ^b   Rosen, Joseph M ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

abdominal wall reconstruction; acellular dermal matrix; biologic mesh; complex ventral hernia repair; components separation; cost analysis; cost utility; cost effectiveness; economic analysis

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DEVICES; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION STUDY; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMAN; MEDICARE; PROCEDURES; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGICAL MESH; UNITED STATES;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; MEDICARE; MODELS, ECONOMIC; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SURGICAL MESH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942986033     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: 15363708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829fd306     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL,. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990; 86: 519-526.
2. Ghazi B, Deigni O, Yezhelyev M, Current options in the management of complex abdominal wall defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 66: 488-492.
3. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010; 148: 544-558.
4. Chatterjee A, Krishnan NM, Van Vliet MM, A comparison of free autologous breast reconstruction with and without the use of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 693e-701e.
5. Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Van Vliet MM, A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 953-961.
6. Thoma A, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2003; 23: 287-295.
7. Thoma A, Veltri K, Khuthaila D, Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 1650-1661.
8. Davis Sears E, Chung KC,. Decision analysis in plastic surgery: a primer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1373-1380.
9. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1755-1762.
10. Ingenix. DRG Expert, ICD-10 Ed: Ingenix, 2012.
11. Services, U. D. o. H. a. H. Physician Fee Schedule Search. In:C. f. M. a. M. Services (ed.), 2012.
12. Hadeed JG, Walsh MD, Pappas TN, Complex abdominal wall hernias: a new classification system and approach to management based on review of 133 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 66: 497-503.
13. Ko JH, Wang EC, Salvay DM, Abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned from 200 "components separation" procedures. Arch Surg. 2009; 144: 1047-1055.
14. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: "components separation technique" versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2007; 31: 756-763.
15. Clarke JM,. Incisional hernia repair by fascial component separation: results in 128 cases and evolution of technique. Am J Surg. 2010; 200: 2-8.
16. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, Components separation technique for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196: 32-37.
17. Girotto JA, Ko MJ, Redett R, Closure of chronic abdominal wall defects: a long-term evaluation of the components separation method. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 42: 385-394; discussion 394-385.
18. Shestak KC, Edington HJ, Johnson RR,. The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, applications, and limitations revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 731-738; quiz 739.
19. Cohen M, Morales R Jr., Fildes J, Staged reconstruction after gunshot wounds to the abdomen. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108: 83-92.
20. Alaedeen DI, Lipman J, Medalie D, The single-staged approach to the surgical management of abdominal wall hernias in contaminated fields. Hernia. 2007; 11: 41-45.
21. Giurgius M, Bendure L, Davenport DL, The endoscopic component separation technique for hernia repair results in reduced morbidity compared to the open component separation technique. Hernia. 2012; 16: 47-51.
22. Sukkar SM, Dumanian GA, Szczerba SM, Challenging abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg. 2001; 181: 115-121.
23. Dragu A, Klein P, Unglaub F, Tensiometry as a decision tool for abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation. World J Surg. 2009; 33: 1174-1180.
24. Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Gatti M, Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement. Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 69: 394-398.
25. Ko JH, Salvay DM, Paul BC, Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, significantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 836-847.
26. Ghali S, Turza KC, Baumann DP, Minimally invasive component separation results in fewer wound-healing complications than open component separation for large ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214: 981-989.
27. Satterwhite TS, Miri S, Chung C, Abdominal wall reconstruction with dual layer cross-linked porcine dermal xenograft: the "Pork Sandwich" herniorraphy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65: 333-341.
28. Kolker AR, Brown DJ, Redstone JS, Multilayer reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with acellular dermal allograft (AlloDerm) and component separation. Ann Plast Surg. 2005; 55: 36-41; discussion 41-32.
29. Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J, Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: 654-660.
30. Harth KC, Rosen MJ,. Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2010; 199: 342-346; discussion 346-347.
31. Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, de la Torre JI, Marrero I, Utilization of human cadaveric acellular dermis for abdominal hernia reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 58: 264-267.
32. Sailes FC, Walls J, Guelig D, Synthetic and biological mesh in component separation: a 10-year single institution review. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 696-698.
33. census, U. In U. f. census (Ed.), 2012.
34. Heniford BM, BD, Park A, Parra-Davila E, The appropriate use of biologics in ventral hernia repair. General Surgery News. New York: McMahon Publishing; 2011: 1-8.
35. Mathes SJ, Steinwald PM, Foster RD, Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure. Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 586-596.
36. Byrnes MC, Irwin E, Carlson D, Repair of high-risk incisional hernias and traumatic abdominal wall defects with porcine mesh. Am Surg. 2011; 77: 144-150.
37. Moore M, Bax T, MacFarlane M, Outcomes of the fascial component separation technique with synthetic mesh reinforcement for repair of complex ventral incisional hernias in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg. 2008; 195: 575-579; discussion 579.
38. Tong WM, Hope W, Overby DW, Comparison of outcome after mesh-only repair, laparoscopic component separation, and open component separation. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 66: 551-556.
39. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 392-398.
40. Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Effect of mesh type and position on subsequent abdominal operations after incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212: 496-502; discussion 502-494.
41. Finan KR, Kilgore ML, Hawn MT,. Open suture versus mesh repair of primary incisional hernias: a cost-utility analysis. Hernia. 2009; 13: 173-182.
42. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 578-583; discussion 583-575.
43. Chen NC, Shauver MJ, Chung KC,. A primer on use of decision analysis methodology in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34: 983-990.
44. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Eccles M, Decision analysis in patient care. Lancet. 2001; 358: 571-574.
45. Birkmeyer JD, Liu JY,. Decision analysis models: opening the black box. Surgery. 2003; 133: 1-4.
46. Hultman CS, Tong WM, Kittinger BJ, Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 66: 504-507.
47. Cavallaro A, Lo Menzo E, Di Vita M, Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 1928-1933.