How Co-translational Folding of Multi-domain Protein Is Affected by Elongation Schedule: Molecular Simulations

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Tanaka, Tomohiro ^a   Hori, Naoto ^a   Takada, Shoji ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

FOLDING PROBABILITIES; FOLDINGS; FUNCTIONAL STATE; IN-VIVO; MISFOLDING; MOLECULAR SIMULATIONS; MULTI-DOMAINS; REFOLDING; STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS; STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION;

PROTEINS;

CARRIER PROTEINS AND BINDING PROTEINS; PROTEIN SUFI; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; SUFI PROTEIN, E COLI;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CODON; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PROTEIN COTRANSLATIONAL FOLDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN REFOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; RNA TRANSLATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ELASTIC MODULUS; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PEPTIDE CHAIN ELONGATION, TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 84938675284     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004356     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG, Theory of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Elsevier; 2004;14: 70–75. 15102452
2. Kubelka J, Hofrichter J, Eaton W a, The protein folding “speed limit”. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004;14: 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.013 15102453
3. Han J-H, Batey S, Nickson A a, Teichmann S a, Clarke J, The folding and evolution of multidomain proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8: 319–330. doi: 10.1038/nrm2144 17356578
4. Fitter J, The perspectives of studying multi-domain protein folding. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66: 1672–1681. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-8771-9 19183848
5. Gershenson A, Gierasch LM, Protein folding in the cell: challenges and progress. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2011;21: 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.11.001 21112769
6. Sarkar M, Smith AE, Pielak GJ, Impact of reconstituted cytosol on protein stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110: 19342–19347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312678110 24218610
7. Ebbinghaus S, Dhar A, McDonald JD, Gruebele M, Protein folding stability and dynamics imaged in a living cell. Nat Methods. Nature Publishing Group; 2010;7: 319–323. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1435 20190760
8. Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M, Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;475: 324–332. doi: 10.1038/nature10317 21776078
9. Zhang G, Ignatova Z, Folding at the birth of the nascent chain: coordinating translation with co-translational folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2011;21: 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.10.008 21111607
10. Zipser D, Perrin D. Complementation on ribosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1963. pp. 533–537.
11. Fedorov AN, Baldwin TO, Cotranslational Protein Folding. J Biol Chem. 1997;272: 32715–32718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.52.32715 9407040
12. Gloge F, Becker AH, Kramer G, Bukau B, Co-translational mechanisms of protein maturation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;24: 24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.004 24721450
13. Frydman J, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Hartl FU, Co-translational domain folding as the structural basis for the rapid de novo folding of firefly luciferase. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6: 697–705. doi: 10.1038/10754 10404229
14. Ugrinov KG, Clark PL, Cotranslational folding increases GFP folding yield. Biophys J. Biophysical Society; 2010;98: 1312–1320. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4291
15. O’Brien EP, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, New scenarios of protein folding can occur on the ribosome. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133: 513–526. Available: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja107863z doi: 10.1021/ja107863z 21204555
16. Zhang G, Hubalewska M, Ignatova Z, Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16: 274–280. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1554 19198590
17. Komar AA, A pause for thought along the co-translational folding pathway. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34: 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.10.002 18996013
18. O’Brien EP, Ciryam P, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, Understanding the Influence of Codon Translation Rates on Cotranslational Protein Folding. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47: 1536–1544. doi: 10.1021/ar5000117 24784899
19. Spencer P, Barral J, Genetic code redundancy and its influence on the encoded polypeptides. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2012;1. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/rncsb/index.php/csbj/article/view/13
20. Gloge F, Becker AH, Kramer G, Bukau B, Co-translational mechanisms of protein maturation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;24: 24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.004 24721450
21. Purvis IJ, Bettany a J, Santiago TC, Coggins JR, Duncan K, Eason R, et al. The efficiency of folding of some proteins is increased by controlled rates of translation in vivo. A hypothesis. J Mol Biol. 1987;193: 413–417. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3298659 3298659
22. Komar AA, Lesnik T, Reiss C, Synonymous codon substitutions affect ribosome traffic and protein folding during in vitro translation. FEBS Lett. 1999;462: 387–391. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10622731 10622731
23. Morrissey MP, Ahmed Z, Shakhnovich EI, The role of cotranslation in protein folding: a lattice model study. Polymer. Elsevier; 2004;45: 557–571.
24. Krobath H, Shakhnovich EI, Faísca PFN, Structural and energetic determinants of co-translational folding. J Chem Phys. 2013;138: 215101. doi: 10.1063/1.4808044 23758397
25. Deane CM, Dong M, Huard FPE, Lance BK, Wood GR, Cotranslational protein folding—fact or fiction? Bioinformatics. 2007;23: i142–148. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm175 17646290
26. Saunders R, Deane CM, Synonymous codon usage influences the local protein structure observed. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38: 6719–6728. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq495 20530529
27. Elcock AH, Molecular Simulations of Cotranslational Protein Folding: Fragment Stabilities, Folding Cooperativity, and Trapping in the Ribosome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006;2: e98. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020098 16789821
28. O’Brien EP, Hsu S-TD, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, Transient tertiary structure formation within the ribosome exit port. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132: 16928–16937. doi: 10.1021/ja106530y 21062068
29. O’Brien EP, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, Prediction of variable translation rate effects on cotranslational protein folding. Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2012;3: 868. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1850 22643895
30. Bryngelson JD, Wolynes PG, Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84: 7524–7528. 3478708
31. Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG, Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1997;48: 545–600. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545 9348663
32. Li W, Terakawa T, Wang W, Takada S, Energy landscape and multiroute folding of topologically complex proteins adenylate kinase and 2ouf-knot. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: 17789–17794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201807109 22753508
33. Wang Y, Chu X, Suo Z, Wang E, Wang J. Multidomain Protein Solves the Folding Problem by Multifunnel Combined Landscape: Theoretical Investigation of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase. J Am Chem Soc. 2012; doi: 10.1021/ja3045663
34. Ito M, Ozawa T, Takada S. Folding Coupled with Assembly in Split Green Fluorescent Proteins Studied by Structure-Based Molecular Simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2013; doi: 10.1021/jp4032817
35. Chen T, Song J, Chan HS, Theoretical perspectives on nonnative interactions and intrinsic disorder in protein folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. Elsevier; 2015;30: 32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.12.002 25544254
36. Taketomi H, Ueda Y, Go N, Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. Int J Pept Protein Res. Wiley Online Library; 1975;7: 445–459. 1201909
37. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN, Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and “en-route” intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 2000;298: 937–953. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3693 10801360
38. Koga N, Takada S, Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Go-like model. J Mol Biol. 2001;313: 171–180. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5037 11601854
39. Hills RD, Brooks CL, Insights from coarse-grained gō models for protein folding and dynamics. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10: 889–905. doi: 10.3390/ijms10030889 19399227
40. Fujitsuka Y, Takada S, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG, Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding. Proteins. 2004;54: 88–103. doi: 10.1002/prot.10429 14705026
41. Hori N, Chikenji G, Berry RS, Takada S, Folding energy landscape and network dynamics of small globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 73–78. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811560106 19114654
42. Rao F, Caflisch A, The protein folding network. J Mol Biol. 2004;342: 299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.063 15313625
43. Spencer PS, Siller E, Anderson JF, Barral JM, Silent substitutions predictably alter translation elongation rates and protein folding efficiencies. J Mol Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;422: 328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.010 22705285
44. O’Brien EP, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, Kinetic modelling indicates that fast-translating codons can coordinate cotranslational protein folding by avoiding misfolded intermediates. Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2014;5.
45. Tarry M, Arends SJR, Roversi P, Piette E, Sargent F, Berks BC, et al. The Escherichia coli cell division protein and model Tat substrate SufI (FtsP) localizes to the septal ring and has a multicopper oxidase-like structure. J Mol Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2009;386: 504–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.043 19135451
46. Fiser A, Do RKG, Sali A, Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci. 2000;9: 1753–1773. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 11045621
47. Case DA, Darden TA, T.E. Cheatham I, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, et al. AMBER 11. University of California, San Francisco; 2010.
48. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: D290–301. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1065 22127870
49. Kenzaki H, Koga N, Hori N, Kanada R, Li W, Okazaki K, et al. CafeMol: A Coarse-Grained Biomolecular Simulator for Simulating Proteins at Work. J Chem Theory Comput. 2011;7: 1979–1989. doi: 10.1021/ct2001045
50. Terakawa T, Takada S, Multiscale ensemble modeling of intrinsically disordered proteins: p53 N-terminal domain. Biophys J. Biophysical Society; 2011;101: 1450–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.003
51. Wang G, Dunbrack RL, PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics. 2003;19: 1589–1591. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg224 12912846
52. Fauchere JL, Pliska V, Hydrophobic parameters-pi of amino-acid side-chains from the partitioning of N-acetyl-amino-acid amides. Eur J Med Chem. 1983;18: 369–375.
53. Chan HS, Zhang Z, Wallin S, Liu Z, Cooperativity, local-nonlocal coupling, and nonnative interactions: principles of protein folding from coarse-grained models. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2011;62: 301–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103405 21453060
54. Honeycutt JD, Thirumalai D, The nature of folded states of globular proteins. Biopolymers. 1992;32: 695–709. doi: 10.1002/bip.360320610 1643270
55. Guo Z, Thirumalai D, Kinetics of protein folding: nucleation mechanism, time scales, and pathways. Biopolymers. 1995;36: 83–102.
56. Chan PP, Lowe TM, GtRNAdb: a database of transfer RNA genes detected in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37: D93–97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn787 18984615
57. Hu Y, Efficient, High-Quality Force-Directed Graph Drawing. Math J. 2005;10: 37–71.