Building a bonfire that remains stoked: sustainment of a contingency management intervention developed through collaborative design

Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Hartzler, Bryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior therapy dissemination; Collaborative design; Contingency management

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MIDDLE AGED; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84938560683     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1747597X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13011-015-0027-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Higgins ST, Silverman K, Heil SH. Contingency management in substance abuse treatment. New York: Guilford; 2008.
2. Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2006;101:192-203.
3. Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney JW, Greenwell L, Roll JM. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2006;101:1546-60.
4. Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, Kirby KC, Matejkowski J, Clements NT, Seymour BL, Festinger DS. Prize-based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2014;109:1426-36.
5. Petry NM, Martin B. Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine- and opioid-abusing methadone patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:398-405.
6. Petry NM, Peirce J, Stitzer ML, Blaine J, Roll JM, Cohen A, Li R. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1148-56.
7. Peirce J, Petry NM, Stitzer ML, Blaine J, Kellogg S, Satterfield F, Kolodner K. Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:201-8.
8. Hartzler B, Rabun C. Community treatment adoption of contingency management: a conceptual profile of U.S. clinics based on innovativeness of executive staff. Int J Drug Policy. 2013;24(4):333-41.
9. Ritter A, Cameron J. Australian clinician attitudes towards contingency management: comparing down under with America. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;87:312-5.
10. Kirby KC, Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, Kerwin ME. Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: implications for dissemination. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;85:19-27.
11. Roman PM, Abraham AJ, Rothrauff TC, Knudsen HK. A longitudinal study of organizational formation, innovation adoption, and dissemination activities within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;38(Supplement 1):S44-52.
12. Tuten M, Svikis DS, Keyser-Marcus L, O'Grady KE, Jones HE. Lessons learned from a randomized trial of fixed and escalating contingency management schedules in opioid-dependent pregnant women. A J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012;38(4):286-92.
13. Walker R, Rosvall T, Field CA, Allen S, McDonald D, Salim Z, Adinoff B. Disseminating contingency management to increase attendance in two community substance abuse treatment centers: lessons learned. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;39(3):202-9.
14. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. Vol. 5. New York: The Free Press; 2003.
15. Rogers EM. Diffusion of drug abuse prevention programs: Spontaneous diffusion, agenda setting, and reinvention. In: Backer TE, David SL, Saucy G, editors. Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer, NIDA Research Monograph 155. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995. p. 90-105.
16. Petry NM. Contingency Management for substance abuse treatment: a guide to implementing this evidence-based practice. New York: Routledge, 2012.
17. Hartzler B, Lash SJ, Roll JM. Contingency management in substance abuse treatment: a structured review of the evidence for its transportability. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;122(1-2):1-10.
18. Tenkasi RV, Mohrman SA. Technology transfer as collaborative learning, NIDA Research Monograph 155. In: Backer TE, David SL, Saucy G, editors. Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995. p. 147-68.
19. Hartzler B, Jackson TR, Jones BE, Beadnell B, Calsyn DA. Disseminating contingency management: impacts of staff training and implementation at an opiate treatment program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46:429-38.
20. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217-26.
21. Lehman WEK, Greener JM, Simpson DD. Assessing organizational readiness for change. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;22:197-209.
22. Greener JM, Joe GW, Simpson DD, Rowan-Szal GA, Lehman WEK. Influence of organizational functioning on client engagement in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;33(2):139-47.
23. Hartzler B, Rabun C. Training addiction professionals in empirically-supported treatments: perspectives from the treatment community. Subst Abus. 2014;35(1):30-6.
24. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Ledgerwood DM, Sierra S. Psychometric properties of the contingency management competence scale. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109(1):167-74.
25. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, McCue Horwitz S. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(1):4-23.
26. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7.
27. Bernard HS, Ryan GW. Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Los Angelos, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2010.
28. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor E. Dissemination and implemenation research in health: translating science to practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012.
29. Hartzler B, Donovan DM, Tillotson C, Mongoue-Tchokote S, Doyle S, McCarty D. A multi-level approach to predicting community addiction treatment attitudes about contingency management. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;42(2):213-21.
30. Fuller BE, Rieckmann T, Nunes EV, Miller M, Arfken C, Edmundson E, McCarty D. Organizational Readiness for Change and opinions toward treatment innovations. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;33(2):183-92.
31. Garner B, Hunter BD, Modisette KC, Ihnes PC, Godley SH. Treatment staff turnover in organizations implementing evidence-based practices: turnover rates and their association with client outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;42(2):134-42.
32. Eby LT, Burk H, Maher CP. How serious of a problem is staff turnover in substance abuse treatment? A longitudinal study of actual turnover. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;39(3):264-71.
33. Garner B, Hunter BD, Godley SH, Godley MD. Training and retaining staff to competently deliver an evidence-based practice: the role of staff attributes and perceptions of organizational functioning. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;42:191-200.
34. Carpenter KM, Cheng WY, Smith JL, Brooks AC, Amrhein PC, Wain RM, Nunes EV. "Old dogs" and new skills: how clinician characteristics relate to motivational interviewing skills before, during, and after training. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80(4):560-73.
35. Martino S, Canning-Ball M, Carroll KM, Rounsaville B. A criterion-based stepwise approach for training counselors in motivational interviewing. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011;40:357-65.
36. Kellogg SH, Burns M, Coleman P, Stitzer ML, Wale, JB, Kreek, MJ. Something of value: the introduction of contingency management interventions into the New York City Health and Hospital Addiction Treatment Service. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;28:57-65.
37. Wiltsey Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendation for future research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:17.
38. Squires DD, Gumbley SJ, Storti SA. Training substance abuse treatment organizations to adopt evidence-based practices: the addiction transfer center of New England science-to-service laboratory. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008;34:293-301.
39. Carroll KM, Onken LS. Behavioral therapies for drug abuse. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1452-60.
40. Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: getting started and moving on from stage I. Clin Psychol: Sci Pract. 2001;8(2):133-42.
41. Carroll KM. Treatment integrity and dissemination: rethinking fidelity via the stage model. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2013;20:99-106.
42. Kendall PC, Beidas RS. Smoothing the trail for dissemination of evidence-based practices for youth: flexibility within fidelity. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2007;38(1):13-20.
43. Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn H. A guiding framework and approache for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25(2):194-206.
44. Fixsen D, Naoom S, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature, T.N.I.R.N. Louis de la Pate Florida Mental Health Institute, Editor. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida; 2005.
45. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons GA, Bunger A, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65-76.