Community treatment adoption of contingency management: A conceptual profile of U.S. clinics based on innovativeness of executive staff

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 333-341

  Hartzler, Bryan ^a   Rabun, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Community treatment; Contingency management; Innovation adoption

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; OPIATE SUBSTITUTION TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED STATES;

COMMUNITY TREATMENT; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION ADOPTION;

ADULT; COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS; DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84880507457     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: 18734758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Amodeo M., Storti S.A., Larson M.J. Moving empirically supported practices to addiction treatment programs: Recruiting supervisors to help in technology transfer. Substance Use and Misuse 2010, 45(6):968-982.
2. Baer J.S., Wells E.A., Rosengren D.B., Hartzler B., Beadnell B., Dunn C.W. Agency context and tailored training in technology transfer: A pilot evaluation of motivational interviewing training for community counsellors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2009, 37:191-202.
3. Bernard H.S., Ryan G.W. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches 2010, Sage Publications, Inc., Los Angelos, CA.
4. Brooner R.K., Kidorf M., King V.L., Stoller K.B., Peirce J.M., Bigelow G.E., Kolodner K. Behavioral contingencies improve counseling attendance in an adaptive treatment model. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2004, 27:223-232.
5. Damschroder L.J., Hagedorn H.J. A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaivors 2011, 25(2):194-205.
6. Ducharme L.J., Knudsen H.K., Abraham A.J., Roman P.M. Counselor attitudes toward the use of motivational incentives in addiction treatment. American Journal of Addiction 2010, 19:496-503.
7. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1957, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
8. Glasner-Edwards S., Rawson R. Evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: review and recommendations for public policy. Health Policy 2010, 97:93-104.
9. Griffith J.D., Rowan-Szal G.A., Roark R.R., Simpson D.D. Contingency management in outpatient methadone treatment: a meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000, 58:55-66.
10. Hartzler B., Lash S.J., Roll J.M. Contingency management in substance abuse treatment: a structured review of the evidence for its transportability. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2012, 122(1-2):1-10.
11. Heaven C., Clegg J., Maguire P. Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: The impact of clinical supervision. Patient Education and Counseling 2006, 60:313-325.
12. Higgins S.T., Budney A.J., Bickel W.K., Hughes J.R., Roerg F., Badger G.J. Achieving cocaine abstinence with a behavioral approach. American Journal of Psychiatry 1993, 150(5):763-769.
13. IOM (1998). Bridging the gap between practice and research: Forging partnerships with community-based drug and alcohol treatment. Washington, DC.
14. Kirby K.C., Benishek L.A., Dugosh K.L., Kerwin M.E. Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: Implications for dissemination. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006, 85:19-27.
15. Lash S.J., Stephens R.S., Burden J.L., Grambow S.C., DeMarce J.M., Jones M.E., Horner R.D. Contracting, prompting, and reinforcing substance use disorder continuing care: A randomized clinical trial. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2007, 21(3):387-397.
16. Lussier J.P., Heil S.H., Mongeon J.A., Badger G.J., Higgins S.T. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006, 101:192-203.
17. Manuel J.K., Hagedorn H.J., Finney J.W. Implementing evidence-based psychosocial treatment in specialty substance use disorder care. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2011, 25(2):225-237.
18. McCarty D.J., Fuler B.E., Arfken C., Miller M., Nunes E.V., Edmundson E., Wendt W.W. Direct care workers in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network: Characteristics, opinions, and beliefs. Psychiatric Services 2007, 58(2):181-190.
19. Oser C.B., Roman P.M. A categorical typology of naltrexone-adopting private substance abuse treatment centers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2008, 34:433-442.
20. Petry N.M. A comprehensive guide to the application of contingency management procedures in clinical settings. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000, 58:9-25.
21. Petry N.M., Martin B., Cooney J.L., Kranzler H.R. Give them prizes, and they will come: Contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000, 68:250-257.
22. Prendergast M., Podus D., Finney J.W., Greenwell L., Roll J.M. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006, 101:1546-1560.
23. Rhodes T., Stimson G.V., Moore D., Bourgois P. Qualitative social reserach in addictions publishing: Creating an enabling journal environment. International Journal of Drug Policy 2010, 21(6):441-444.
24. Ritter A., Cameron J. Australian clinician attitudes towards contingency management: Comparing down under with America. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007, 87:312-315.
25. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations 2003, vol. 5. The Free Press, New York.
26. Roll J.M., Madden G.J., Rawson R., Petry N.M. Facilitating the adoption of contingency management for the treatment of substance use disorders. Behavior Analysis in Practice 2009, 2:4-13.
27. Roman P.M., Abraham A.J., Rothrauff T.C., Knudsen H.K. A longitudinal study of organizational formation, innovation adoption, and dissemination activities within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2010, 38(Supplement 1):S44-S52.
28. Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health 1995, 18:179-183.
29. Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing and Health 2000, 23:246-255.
30. Silverman K., Svikis D.S., Wong C.J., Hampton J., Stitzer M.L., Bigelow G.E. A reinforcement-based therapeutic workplace for the treatment of drug abuse: Three year abstinence outcomes. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2002, 10(3):228-240.
31. Sinclair J.M.A., Burton A., Ashcroft R., Priebe S. Clinician and service user perceptions of implementing contingency management: A focus group study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2011, 119:56-63.
32. Stitzer M.L., Bigelow G.E., Lawrence C., Cohen J., D'Lugoff B., Hawthorne J. Medication take-home as a reinforcer in a methadone maintenance program. Addictive Behaviors 1977, 2:9-14.
33. Stitzer M.L., Petry N.M., Peirce J. Motivational incentives research in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2010, 38:S61-S69.