Professional engagement – The subject specialist in higher education

Subject Librarians: Engaging with the Learning and Teaching Environment

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 19-32

  Dale, Penny ^a   Leharne, Maggie ^b   Knight, Trudi ^b   Marshall, Kate ^b  

^a University of Greenwich ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938536140     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Anderson, G., 1992. Dimensions, context and freedom. The library in the social creation of knowledge. In Barrett, E. (ed.), Sociomedia: multimedia, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge, Cambridge, MA.: MIT, pp. 107-124.
2. Barry, C. and Squires, D., 1995. Why the move from traditional information-seeking to the electronic library is not straightforward for academic users: some surprising findings. Online Information Proceedings, December, 177-187.
3. Bell, S. and Shank, J., 2004. The blended librarian: a blueprint for defining the teaching and learning role of academic librarians. College and Research Libraries News, 65 (7), 372-375.
4. Biggs, J., 2003. Teaching for quality learning at university. 2nd ed. Buckingham: SHRE.
5. Bruce, C., 1997. The seven faces of information literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
6. Bundy, A., 2005. Changing and connecting the educational silos: the potential of the information literacy framework. LILAC 2005. 5 April 2005 Imperial College. London: LILAC.
7. Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, (CILIP) 2003. Professional Ethics [online]. Available from: http://www.cilip.org.uk/professionalguidance/ethics [Accessed 18 April 2005].
8. Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, (CILIP) 2004. Framework for Professional Qualifications [online]. Available from: http://www. cilip.org.uk/qualificationschartership/Frameworkof Qualifications/[Accessed 15 July 2005].
9. Corrall, S., 2002. The inclusive library: rethinking information services for the network society. Library and Information Update, 1 (9), 24-5.
10. Dale, P. et al., 2005. Knowledge Share: bibliographic software to support collaborative work. In B. Newland, et al. (eds.), Flexible Learning: How far have we come? 5-6 July 2004, Bournemouth University. Poole: Learning Design Studio, Bournemouth University, 24-31.
11. Gill, M., and Newton, A., 2002. Longing to be free of the enquiry desk? SCONUL Newsletter, 25 43-45.
12. Gonzales, R., 2001. Opinions and experiences of university faculty regarding library research instruction. Results of a web-based survey at the University of Southern Colorado. Research Strategies, 18 191-201.
13. Harley, B. et al., 2001. The postmodern condition: students, the web and academic library services. Reference Services Review, 29 (1), 23-32.
14. Hart, L., 2004. Managing merged services. Multimedia Information and Technology, 30, (1), 154-155.
15. Higher Education Academy, 2004. Proposals for national professional standards for supporting learning in higher education. [online]. Available from: http://www. heacademy.ac.uk/regand accr/Standards Models Final Paper.pdf [Accessed 21 April 2005].
16. Hughes, C., 2000. Information services for higher education. A new competitive space. D-Lib Magazine [online], 6 (12). Available from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december00/hughes/12hughes.html [Accessed 20 April 2005].
17. Hyde, M., 2000. Developing your career inhouse. Records Management Bulletin, 99, 15, 17-18.
18. Informationcity. 2005. The online community for library and information professionals. Available from: http://informationcity.com. [Accessed 11 May 2005]
19. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) 2004. JISC Usage Surveys: Trends in Electronic Information Services [online]. Available from: http://dil.aber.ac.uk/dils/research/justeis/cyc2rep.pdf [Accessed 19 April 2005].
20. Kempcke, K., 2002. The Art of War for Librarians. Portal, 2 (4), 529-551.
21. Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. London Metropolitan University, 2005. Deliberations Project: Linking course provision to resources [online]. Available from: http://londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/courses-and-resources/course-provision.cfm [Accessed 17 April 2005].
23. Manchester Metropolitan University, 2003. Big Blue Connect, final report [online]. Available from: http://www.library.mmu.ac.uk/bbconnect/finalreport.pdf [Accessed 19 April 2005].
24. Martell, C., 2000. The disembodied librarian in the digital age, part ii. College and Research Libraries, 61 (2), 99-113.
25. Marton, F., and Saljo, R., 1984. Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D.J. Hounsell, and N.J. Entwistle, (eds) The experience of learning, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
26. Moon, J., 1999. Learning journals: a handbook for academics, students and professional development. London: Kogan Page.
27. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE), 1997. Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the National Committee (Dearing Report) [online]. Available from: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/[Accessed 17 April 2005].
28. Nimon, M., 2002. Developing lifelong learners: controversy and the educative. Australian Academic and Research Libraries [online], 33 (1). Available from: http://www.alia.org.au/publishing/aarl/33.1/full.text/nimon.html [Accessed 17 April 2005].
29. Oberman, C., 1991. Avoiding the cereal syndrome, or critical thinking in the electronic environment. Library Trends, 39 (3), 199-202.
30. Owen, T.B., 2003. Lessons in information literacy. Information World Review, 191 24.
31. Owusu-Ansah, E., 2004. Information literacy and higher education: placing the academic library in the centre of a comprehensive solution. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30 (1), 3-16.
32. Pinfield, S., 2001. The changing role of subject librarians in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 33 (1), 32-38.
33. Prensky, M., 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon [online], 9 (5). Available from: http://www.twitchspeed.com/site/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20 Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.htm [Accessed 1 December 2004].
34. Price, G. 1999. User education in higher education: helping academics join the learning environment. In IATUL, The future of libraries in human communication. 17-21 May 1999. Technical University of Crete, Chania, Crete. Available from: http://www.iatul.org/conference/proceedings/vol09/papers/price.html [Accessed 17 April 2005]
35. Price, G., 2005. Keynote address. LILAC 2005. 4-6 April 2005 Imperial College London.
36. Quality Assurance Agency in Higher Education (QAA), 2001. Guidelines for HE progress files [online]. Available from: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/progress Files/guidelines/progfile2001.asp [Accessed 21 April 2005].
37. Radford, G., 1998. The bibliotheque fantastique. Library Trends, 46 (4), 616-634.
38. Rutter, L. and Dale, P., 2004. Ways to engage widening participation students. In P. Brophy, et al. (eds.) Libraries without walls 5: the distributed delivery of library and information services, London: Facet.
39. Thomas, L., et al., 2004. Learning brokerage: building bridges between learners and providers. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
40. University of Wales, Bangor 2005. Proposed restructuring of the library provision at UWB: a consultation paper [online]. Available from: http://www.bangor.ac.uk/is/iss069/website/strategyfinal.pdf
41. Webb, J., and Powis, C., 2004. Teaching Information Skills: Theory and Practice. London: Facet.
42. Webb, T., and Zhang, B., 1997. Information dropshipping. Library Hi-Tech, 57-58, 145-149.
43. Webber, S., 2005. Sheila Webber's Information Literacy Weblog [online]. Available from: http://ciquest.shef.ac.uk/infolit/[Accessed 18 April 2005].
44. Webber, S. and Johnson, B., 2004. Perspectives on the information literate university. SCONUL Focus [online], 33 (Winter), 33-35. Available from: http://www.sconul. ac.uk/pubs_stats/newsletter/33/12.pdf
45. Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Whyley, C., and Callender, C., 1997. Report 4, Administrative and support staff in higher education: their experiences and expectations. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. Available from: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/niche/[Accessed 18 April 2005].
47. Wikipedia. 2005. The free encyclopedia. Available from: http://en.org/wiki/[Accessed 11 May 2005].
48. Wilson, R., 2003. Learner support staff in higher education: victims of change? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35 (2), 79-86.
49. Yang, Z., 2000. University Faculty's Perception of a Library Liaison Program: A Case Study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26 (2), 124-128.