Open to influence: what counts as academic influence in scholarly networked Twitter participation

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 287-309

  Stewart, Bonnie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

academic influence; networked influence; networked publics; networked scholarship; open scholarship; scholarly reputation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938419535     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1015547     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. K.Barad, 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2. J.Bar-Ilan,, S.Haustein, I.Peters, J.Priem, H.Shema, and J.Terliesner. 2012. Beyond Citations: Scholars’ Visibility on the Social Web. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5611.
3. N.Baym, 2010. Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
4. T.Boellstorff,, B.Nardi, C.Pearce, and T.L.Taylor. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. D.boyd, d. 2010. “Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information Through Social Media.” EDUCAUSE Review 45 (5): 26–36.
6. D.boyd, d. 2011. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In A Networked Self, edited by Z.Papcharissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge.
7. D.boyd, d., and J.Heer. 2006. “Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster.” Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2006.394.
8. A.Bruns, 2007. “Produsage: Towards a Broader Framework for User-Led Content Creation.” Creativity & cognition conference. http://produsage.org/articles.
9. J.Daniel, 2012. “The Future of (Open) Education with Sir John Daniel.” ICT in Education: UNESCO Bangkok. June 18. http://www.unescobkk.org/education/ict/online-resources/databases/ict-in-education-database/item/article/the-future-of-open-education-with-sir-john-daniel-1/.
10. J.Donath,, and D.boydd. 2004. “Public Displays of Connection.” BT Technology Journal 22 (4): 71–82. doi: 10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
11. M.Edington, 2014. “Luxury … and Your Next Book.” Inside Higher Ed. June 26. http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2014/06/26/essay-ideas-about-luxury-and-university-presses#ixzz35nLEYcUh.
12. E.W.Eisner, 1991. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Advancement of Educational Practice. New York: Macmillan.
13. C.Geertz, 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
14. W.J.Gibson,, and A.Brown. 2009. Working with Qualitative Data. London: SAGE.
15. E.G.Guba,, and Y.S.Lincoln. 2005. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K.Denzin and Y.S.Lincoln, 3rd ed., 191–215. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16. D.Haraway, 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
17. D.Haraway, 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by L.Grossberg, C.Nelson, and P.A.Treichler, 295–337. New York: Routledge.
18. D.Haraway, 1994. “A Game of Cat's Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies.” Configurations 2 (1): 59–71. doi: 10.1353/con.1994.0009
19. D.Haraway, 1998. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_Onco MOUSE. New York: Routledge.
20. D.Herron, 2012. “Is Expert Peer Review Obsolete? A Model Suggests That Post-publication Reader Review May Exceed the Accuracy of Traditional Peer Review.” Surgical Endoscopy 26 (8): 2275–2280. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2171-1
21. J.E.Hirsch, 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Research Output.” http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508025.
22. K.Hyland, 2003. “Self-citation and Self-reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (3): 251–259. doi: 10.1002/asi.10204
23. H.Jenkins, 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. R.Kling,, and G.McKim. 1999. “Scholarly Communication and the Continuum of Electronic Publishing.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 (10): 890–906. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:10<890::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-8
25. R.Kop, 2012. “The Unexpected Connection: Serendipity and Human Mediation in Networked Learning.” Educational Technology & Society 15 (2): 2–11.
26. R.V.Kozinets, 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: SAGE.
27. Y.Lincoln,, and G.Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
28. G.A.Lozano,, V.Lariviere, and Y.Gingras. 2012. “The Weakening Relationship Between the Impact Factor and Papers’ Citations in the Digital Age.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (11): 2140–2145. doi: 10.1002/asi.22731
29. D.A.Lupton, 2014. ‘Feeling Better Connected’: Academics’ Use of Social Media. Canberra: News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra. http://www.canberra.edu.au/faculties/arts-design/attachments/pdf/n-and-mrc/Feeling-Better-Connected-report-final.pdf.
30. I.Mewburn,, and P.Thompson. 2013. “Academic Blogging Is Part of a Complex Online Academic Attention Economy, Leading to Unprecedented Readership.” LSE Impact Blog. December 12. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/12/12/academic-attention-economy/.
31. S.M.Morris,, and J.Stommel. 2014. “Hybrid Pedagogy, Digital Humanities, and the Future of Academic Publishing.” Hybrid Pedagogy. April 29. http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/hybrid-pedagogy-digital-humanities-future-academic-publishing/.
32. E.Pariser, 2011. The Filter Bubble. New York: Penguin Press.
33. N.Pearce,, M.Weller, E.Scanlon, and M.Ashleigh. 2010. “Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work in Education.” Education 16 (1): 33–44.
34. G.Ritzer, 2010. “Focusing on the Prosumer: On Correcting an Error in the History of Social Theory.” Prosumer Revisited 2010 (1): 61–79. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91998-03.
35. J.Seaman,, and H.Tinti-Kane. 2013. “Social Media for Teaching and Learning.” October. http://www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/higher-education/social-media-survey.php.
36. N.Selwyn, 2010. “Looking Beyond Learning: Notes Towards the Critical Study of Educational Technology.” Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 26 (1): 65–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
37. S.L.Star, 1991. “Power, Technology, and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions.” In A Sociology of Monsters, edited by J.Law, 26–56. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
38. B.Stewart, 2014. “Notes to Self, Stage Two: Being & Becoming – Profiles as Identities” [Web log post]. March 18. http://theory.cribchronicles.com/2014/03/18/notes-to-self-stage-two-being-becoming-profiles-as-identities/.
39. A.R.Stone, 1995. The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40. G.Veletsianos, 2012. “Higher Education Scholars’ Participation and Practices on Twitter.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28 (4): 336–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00449.x
41. G.Veletsianos,, and R.Kimmons, 2012. “Assumptions and Challenges of Open Scholarship.” IRRODL 13 (4). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1313.
42. J.B.Walther, 1992. “Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective.” Communication Research 19 (1): 52–90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003.
43. M.Weller, 2011. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic. http://www.bloomsburyacademic.com/view/DigitalScholar_9781849666275/book-ba-9781849666275.xml.
44. D.S.White,, and A.LeCornu. 2011. “Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement.” First Monday 16 (9). doi:10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171.
45. J.Willinsky, 2010. “Open Access and Academic Reputation.” Annals of Library and Information Studies 57: 296–302. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/10242/4/ALIS%2057%283%29%20296-302.pdf.