Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 217-222

  Dogan, Sami ^a   Schwedhelm, E Ricardo ^a   Heindl, Harald ^b   Mancl, Lloyd ^a   Raigrodski, Ariel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Aesthetic Dental Creations   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM CHLORIDE; ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; ASTRINGENT AGENT; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM SULFATE; CHLORIDE; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL TECHNICIAN; DENTIST; DEVICES; GINGIVAL RETRACTION TECHNIQUE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TASTE; TOOTH CROWN; VISCOSITY;

ADULT; AGED; ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; ASTRINGENTS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CALCIUM SULFATE; CHLORIDES; CROWNS; DENTAL CASTING INVESTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL TECHNICIANS; DENTISTS; GINGIVAL RETRACTION TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TASTE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84938415281     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: 10976841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. W.W. Chee, and T.E. Donovan Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques J Prosthet Dent 68 1992 728 732
2. N. Perakis, U.C. Belser, and P. Magne Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24 2004 109 117
3. E. Schelb, E. Cavazos, K.B. Troendle, and T.J. Prihoda Surface detail reproduction of type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials Quintessence Int 22 1991 51 55
4. B.J. Millar, S.M. Dunne, and P.B. Robinson In vitro study of the number of surface defects in monophase and two-phase addition silicone impressions J Prosthet Dent 80 1998 32 35
5. S. Levartovsky, G. Levy, T. Brosh, N. Harel, Y. Ganor, and R. Pilo Dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane impression material reproducing the sulcular area Dent Mater J 32 2013 25 31
6. J.E. Martinez, E.C. Combe, and I.J. Pesun Rheological properties of vinyl polysiloxane impression pastes Dent Mater 17 2001 471 476
7. C.S. Petrie, M.P. Walker, A.M. O'mahony, and P. Spencer Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions J Prosthet Dent 90 2003 365 372
8. H. Lu, B. Nguyen, and J.M. Powers Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials J Prosthet Dent 92 2004 151 154
9. M.B. Blatz, A. Sadan, J.O. Burgess, D. Mercante, and S. Holst Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material - a randomized clinical trial Quintessence Int 36 2005 97 104
10. U.S. Beier, I. Grunert, S. Kulmer, and H. Dumfahrt Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients Int J Prosthodont 20 2007 270 274
11. A.J. Raigrodski, S. Dogan, L.A. Mancl, and H. Heindl A clinical comparison of two vinylpolysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique J Prosthet Dent 102 2009 179 186
12. S. Caputi, and G. Varvara Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study J Prosthet Dent 99 2008 274 281
13. S. Levartovsky, M. Zalis, R. Pilo, N. Harel, Y. Ganor, and T. Brosh The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area J Prosthodont 23 2014 124 133
14. E. Tan, J. Chai, and W.T. Wozniak Working times of elastomeric impression materials determined by dimensional accuracy Int J Prosthodont 9 1996 188 196
15. G. Anneroth, and A. Nordenram Reaction of the gingiva to the application of threads in the gingival pocket for taking impressions with elastic material. An experimental histologic study Odontol Revy 20 1969 301 310
16. P.A. Hansen, D.E. Tira, and J. Barlow Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontists J Prosthodont 8 1999 163 170
17. P.V. Goldberg, F.L. Higginbottom, and T.G. Wilson Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy Periodontol 2000 25 2001 100 109
18. D.A. van Strydonck, D.E. Slot, U. Van der Velden, and F. Van der Weijden Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingival inflammation and staining in gingivitis patients: a systematic review J Clin Periodontol 39 2012 1042 1055
19. T.E. Donovan, and W.W. Chee Current concepts in gingival displacement Dent Clin North Am 48 2004 433 444
20. N.Z. Baba, C.J. Goodacre, R. Jekki, and J. Won Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques Dent Clin North Am 58 2014 45 68
21. A.H.L. Tjan, H. Nemetz, L.T.P. Nguyen, and R. Contino Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions J Prosthet Dent 68 1992 19 28
22. H.A. Abuasi, and R.W. Wassell Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one- stage technique Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 65 1994 748 757
23. S. Thongthammachat, B.K. Moore, M.T. Barco II, S. Hovijitra, D.T. Brown, and C.J. Andres Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time J Prosthodont 11 2002 98 108
24. M.E. Brosky, I.J. Pesun, P.D. Lowder, R. Delong, and J.S. Hodges Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy J Prosthet Dent 87 2002 204 209
25. S.J. Lee, and G.O. Gallucci Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes Clin Oral Implants Res 24 2013 111 115
26. E. Yuzbasioglu, H. Kurt, R. Turunc, and H. Bilir Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes BMC Oral Health 14 2014 10
27. J.S. Kim, and R.J. Dailey Biostatistics for oral health care 1st ed. 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard Oxford 165 191, 194, 257
28. A.H. Bowker Bowker's test for symmetry J Am Stat Assoc 43 1948 572 574
29. J. Shao, and D. Tu The Jackknife and bootstrap 1st ed. 1995 Springer-Verlag, Inc New York 23