Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 445-452

  Hampshire, Adam ^a   Sharp, David J ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive control; fMRI; Intrinsic connectivity networks; Neural modules; Response inhibition

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; ATTENTION; COGNITIVE CONTROL; COGNITIVE PROCESS; FMRI; HOLISTIC APPROACH; LATERAL INHIBITION; NEURAL MODULES;

PROCESS CONTROL;

ADDICTION; ANTERIOR INSULA; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; AXONAL INJURY; COGNITION; COMPETITION; DEFAULT MODE NETWORK; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FRONTAL CORTEX; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; INSULA; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROIMAGING; NONHUMAN; PARS OPERCULARIS; REVIEW; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION;

EID: 84938215894     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.06.006     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action - a theory of an act of control. Psychol. Rev. 1984, 91:295-327.
2. Band G.P.H., et al. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol. 2003, 112:105-142.
3. Boucher L., et al. Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 114:376-397.
4. Schall J.D., Godlove D.C. Current advances and pressing problems in studies of stopping. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012, 22:1012-1021.
5. Rubia K., et al. Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. Neuroimage 2001, 13:250-261.
6. Rubia K., et al. Neural substrates of successful versus unsuccessful stopping in a cognitively challenging event related stop task. Neuroimage 2001, 13:S351.
7. Rubia K., et al. Effects of stimulants on brain function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 76:616-628.
8. Seeley W.W., et al. Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks. Neuron 2009, 62:42-52.
9. Rubia K., et al. Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control: a study with functional MRI. Am. J. Psychiatry 1999, 156:891-896.
10. Jilka S.R., et al. Damage to the salience network and interactions with the default mode network. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:10798-10807.
11. Aron A.R., et al. Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans (vol 6, pg 115, 2003). Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:1329.
12. Aron A.R., et al. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:170-177.
13. Aron A.R., Poldrack R.A. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:2424-2433.
14. Swann N., et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus alters the cortical profile of response inhibition in the beta frequency band: a scalp EEG study in Parkinson's disease. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:5721-5729.
15. Wiecki T.V., Frank M.J. A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia. Psychol. Rev. 2013, 120:329-355.
16. Aron A.R., et al. Right inferior frontal cortex: addressing the rebuttals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:905.
17. Aron A., et al. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2014, 18:177-185.
18. Erika-Florence M., et al. A functional network perspective on inhibition and attentional control. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:4073.
19. Hampshire A., et al. The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage 2010, 50:1313-1319.
20. Picton T.W., et al. Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:826-838.
21. Shallice T., et al. Mapping task switching in frontal cortex through neuropsychological group studies. Front. Neurosci. 2008, 2:79-85.
22. Swick D., Chatham C.H. Ten years of inhibition revisited. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:329.
23. Sharp D.J., et al. Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:6106-6111.
24. Shallice T., et al. The multiple dimensions of sustained attention. Cortex 2008, 44:794-805.
25. Mostofsky S.H., Simmonds D.J. Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:751-761.
26. Chatham C.H., et al. Cognitive control reflects context monitoring, not motoric stopping, in response inhibition. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e31546.
27. Braver T.S., et al. Cognition and control in schizophrenia: a computational model of dopamine and prefrontal function. Biol. Psychiatry 1999, 46:312-328.
28. Stuss D.T., Alexander M.P. Is there a dysexecutive syndrome?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2007, 362:901-915.
29. Miyake A., Friedman N.P. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 21:8-14.
30. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013, 64:135-168.
31. McAuley T., et al. The persistence of cognitive deficits in remitted and unremitted ADHD: a case for the state-independence of response inhibition. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2014, 55:292-300.
32. Rush B.K., et al. Accounting for cognitive aging: context processing, inhibition or processing speed?. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B: Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 2006, 13:588-610.
33. Shilling V.M., et al. Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: an investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:605-619.
34. Friedman N.P., Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. 2004, 133:101-135.
35. Stroop J.R. Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions 1935, George Peabody College for Teachers.
36. Salinas E., Stanford T.R. The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:5668-5685.
37. Duann J.R., et al. Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:10171-10179.
38. Menon V., et al. Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2001, 12:131-143.
39. Chamberlain S.R., et al. Atomoxetine modulates right inferior frontal activation during inhibitory control: a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 65:550-555.
40. Hampshire A., et al. Lateral prefrontal cortex subregions make dissociable contributions during fluid reasoning. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:1-10.
41. Hampshire A. Putting the brakes on inhibitory models of frontal lobe function. Neuroimage 2015, 113:340-355.
42. Hampshire A., et al. Selective tuning of the right inferior frontal gyrus during target detection. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2009, 9:103-112.
43. Duncan J. An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2:820-829.
44. Duncan J., Owen A.M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23:475-483.
45. Fedorenko E., et al. Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:16616-16621.
46. Hampshire A., et al. The target selective neural response - similarity, ambiguity, and learning effects. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e2520.
47. Duncan J., et al. A neural basis for general intelligence. Science 2000, 289:457-460.
48. Duncan J. Prefrontal cortex and Spearman's g. Measuring the Mind: Speed, Control, and Age 2005, 249-272. Oxford University Press. J. Duncan (Ed.).
49. Cole M.W., Schneider W. The cognitive control network: integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions. Neuroimage 2007, 37:343-360.
50. Seeley W.W., et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2349-2356.
51. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 24:167-202.
52. Freedman D.J., et al. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 2001, 291:312-316.
53. Stokes M.G., et al. Dynamic coding for cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 2013, 78:364-375.
54. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1995, 18:193-222.
55. Chelazzi L., et al. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 80:2918-2940.
56. Munakata Y., et al. A unified framework for inhibitory control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:453-459.
57. Hampshire A., et al. Selective tuning of the blood oxygenation level-dependent response during simple target detection dissociates human frontoparietal subregions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:6219-6223.
58. Everling S., et al. Filtering of neural signals by focused attention in the monkey prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:671-676.
59. Kusunoki M., et al. Detection of fixed and variable targets in the monkey prefrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2522-2534.
60. Schall J.D., et al. Monitoring and control of action by the frontal lobes. Neuron 2002, 36:309-322.
61. Chen X., et al. Supplementary motor area exerts proactive and reactive control of arm movements. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:14657-14675.
62. Stuphorn V., et al. Role of supplementary eye field in saccade initiation: executive, not direct, control. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:801-816.
63. Ito S., et al. Performance monitoring by the anterior cingulate cortex during saccade countermanding. Science 2003, 302:120-122.
64. Stuphorn V., et al. Performance monitoring by the supplementary eye field. Nature 2000, 408:857-860.
65. Toni I., Passingham R.E. Prefrontal-basal ganglia pathways are involved in the learning of arbitrary visuomotor associations: a PET study. Exp. Brain Res. 1999, 127:19-32.
66. Toni I., et al. Learning arbitrary visuomotor associations: temporal dynamic of brain activity. Neuroimage 2001, 14:1048-1057.
67. Leech R., Sharp D.J. The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain 2014, 137:12-32.
68. Hellyer P.J., et al. The control of global brain dynamics: opposing actions of frontoparietal control and default mode networks on attention. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:451-461.
69. Deco G., et al. Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:10302-10307.
70. Ham T.E., Sharp D.J. How can investigation of network function inform rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury?. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2012, 25:662-669.
71. Hampshire A., Owen A.M. Fractionating attentional control using event-related fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:1679-1689.
72. Hampshire A., et al. An fMRI method for assessing residual reasoning ability in vegetative state patients. Neuroimage 2013, 2:174-183.
73. Sharp D.J., et al. Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014, 10:156-166.
74. Beckmann C.F., Smith S.M. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2004, 23:137-152.
75. Parkin B., et al. Dynamic network mechanisms of relational integration. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35:7660-7673.
76. Hampshire A., et al. Fractionating human intelligence. Neuron 2012, 76:1225-1237.
77. Levy B.J., Wagner A.D. Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1224:40-62.
78. Damoiseaux J.S., et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:13848-13853.
79. Smith S.M., et al. Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:13040-13045.
80. Dosenbach N.U., et al. A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:99-105.
81. Dosenbach N.U., et al. A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron 2006, 50:799-812.
82. Laird A.R., et al. Behavioral interpretations of intrinsic connectivity networks. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:4022-4037.
83. Sharp D.J., et al. Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2011, 134:2233-2247.
84. Fox M.D., Greicius M. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2010, 4:19.
85. Greicius M. Resting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2008, 21:424-430.
86. Rosazza C., Minati L. Resting-state brain networks: literature review and clinical applications. Neurol. Sci. 2011, 32:773-785.