How can investigation of network function inform rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury?

Current Opinion in Neurology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 662-669

  Ham, Timothy E ^a   Sharp, David J ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

diffusion tensor imaging; functional connectivity; intrinsic connectivity network; traumatic axonal injury

Indexed keywords

METHYLPHENIDATE;

ANESTHESIA; BRAIN DEATH; BRAIN FORNIX; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMA; CONSCIOUSNESS; DEPRESSION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MEMORY DISORDER; NERVE CELL NETWORK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; REVIEW; TAXONOMY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; WHITE MATTER;

BRAIN; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION DISORDERS; DIFFUSE AXONAL INJURY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; HUMANS; NERVE NET; NEURAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84870055900     PISSN: 13507540     EISSN: 14736551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328359488f     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Whitnall L, McMillan TM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM. Disability in young people and adults after head injury: 5-7 year follow up of a prospective cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2006; 77:640-645. (Pubitemid 43844591)
2. Mesulam MM. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol 1990; 28:597-613.
3. Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. Brain 1965; 88:237-294.
4. Smith DH, Meaney DF, Shull WH. Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. J Head Trauma Rehab 2003; 18:307-316. (Pubitemid 36899043)
5. Sidaros A, Engberg AW, Sidaros K, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury and relation to clinical outcome: a longitudinal study. Brain 2008; 131:559-572. (Pubitemid 351197606)
6. Seung HS. Reading the book of memory: sparse sampling versus dense mapping of connectomes. Neuron 2009; 62:17-29.
7. Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, et al. Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:13040-13045.
8. Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM. Investigations into restingstate connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond B Sci 2005; 360:1001-1013. (Pubitemid 41672861)
9. Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:13848-13853. (Pubitemid 44413996)
10. van den Heuvel MP, Mandl RC, Kahn RS, Hulshoff Pol HE. Functionally linked resting-state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30:3127-3141.
11. Seeley WW, Crawford RK, Zhou J, et al. Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks. Neuron 2009; 62:42-52.
12. Zhang D, Raichle ME. Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6:15-28.
13. Greicius M. Resting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 2008; 21:424-430.
14. Spreng RN. The fallacy of a ''task-negative'' network. Front Psychology 2012; 3:145.
15. Margulies DS, Vincent JL, Kelly C, et al. Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:20069-20074.
16. Leech R, Kamourieh S, Beckmann CF, Sharp DJ. Fractionating the default mode network: distinct contributions of the ventral and dorsal posterior cingulate cortex to cognitive control. J Neurosci 2011; 31:3217-3224.
17. Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, Dougherty RF. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19:72-78.
18. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:676-682. (Pubitemid 32105102)
19. Shulman GL, Fiez JA, Corbetta M, et al. Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. J Cognitive Neurosci 1997; 9:648-663. (Pubitemid 27455556)
20. Gusnard DA, Akbudak E, Shulman GL, Raichle ME. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:4259-4264. (Pubitemid 32249932)
21. Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1124:1-38. (Pubitemid 351506788)
22. Singh KD, Fawcett IP. Transient and linearly graded deactivation of the human default-mode network by a visual detection task. Neuroimage 2008; 41:100-112.
23. Weissman DH, Roberts KC, Visscher KM, Woldorff MG. The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9:971-978. (Pubitemid 43980513)
24. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Castellanos FX. Spontaneous attentional fluctuations in impaired states and pathological conditions: a neurobiological hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007; 31:977-986. (Pubitemid 47332617)
25. Bonnelle V, Ham TE, Leech R, et al. Salience network integrity predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:4690-4695.
26. Bonnelle V, Leech R, Kinnunen KM, et al. Default mode network connectivity predicts sustained attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 2011; 31:13442-13451.
27. Vincent JL, Kahn I, Snyder AZ, et al. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 2008; 100:3328-3342.
28. Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:13848-13853. (Pubitemid 44413996)
29. Leech R, Braga R, Sharp DJ. Echoes of the brain within the posterior cingulate cortex. J Neurosci 2012; 32:215-222.
30. Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 2007; 27:2349-2356. (Pubitemid 46340968)
31. Ham TE, de Boissezon X, Leff A, et al. Distinct frontal networks are involved in adapting to internally and externally signaled errors. Cerb Cortex 2012; [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 22426336.
32. Lowenstein DH. Traumatic brain injury: a glimpse of order among the chaos? Ann Neurol 2009; 66:A7-8.
33. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Mag Reson Ser B 1996; 111:209-219. (Pubitemid 126758682)
34. MacDonald CL, Dikranian K, Bayly P, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging reliably detects experimental traumatic axonal injury and indicates approximate time of injury. J Neurosci 2007; 27:11869-11876. (Pubitemid 350072120)
35. Squarcina L, Bertoldo A, Ham TE, et al. A robust method for investigating thalamic white-matter tracts after traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage 2012; [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 22813952.
36. Niogi SN, Mukherjee P, Ghajar J, et al. Extent of microstructural white matter injury in postconcussive syndrome correlates with impaired cognitive reaction time: a 3T diffusion tensor imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:967-973. (Pubitemid 351684976)
37. Palacios EM, Sala-Llonch R, Junque C, et al. White matter integrity related to functional working memory networks in traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2012; 78:852-860.
38. Kinnunen KM, Greenwood R, Powell JH, et al. White matter damage and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2011; 134:449-463.
39. Wu TC, Wilde EA, Bigler ED, et al. Evaluating the relationship between memory functioning and cingulum bundles in acute mild traumatic brain injury using diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:303-307.
40. Leunissen I, Coxon JP, Geurts M, Caeyenberghs K, Michiels K, Sunaert S, Swinnen SP. Disturbed cortico-subcortical interactions during motor task switching in traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 22287257; doi: 10.002/hbm.21508.
41. Farbota KD, Bendlin BB, Alexander AL, et al. Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging and neuropsychological correlates in traumatic brain injury patients. FNHUM 2012; 6:160.
42. Sharp DJ, Ham TE. Investigating white matter injury after mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2011; 24:558-563.
43. McAllister TW, Saykin AJ, Flashman LA, et al. Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study. Neurology 1999; 53:1300-1308. (Pubitemid 29480091)
44. Christodoulou C, DeLuca J, Ricker JH, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of working memory impairment after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2001; 71:161-168. (Pubitemid 32675139)
45. Rasmussen IA, Xu J, Antonsen IK, et al. Simple dual tasking recruits prefrontal cortices in chronic severe traumatic brain injury patients, but not in controls. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25:1057-1070.
46. Turner GR, Levine B. Augmented neural activity during executive control processing following diffuse axonal injury. Neurology 2008; 71:812-818.
47. Kim YH, Yoo WK, Ko MH, et al. Plasticity of the attentional network after brain injury and cognitive rehabilitation. Neurorehab Neural Res 2009; 23:468-477.
48. Kasahara M, Menon DK, Salmond CH, et al. Traumatic brain injury alters the functional brain network mediating working memory. Brain Injury 2011; 25:1170-1187.
49. Raja Beharelle A, Tisserand D, Stuss DT, et al. Brain activity patterns uniquely supporting visual feature integration after traumatic brain injury. FNHUM 2011; 5:164.
50. Mainero C, Pantano P, Caramia F, Pozzilli C. Brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis: insights from functional MRI studies. J Neurol Sci 2006; 245:93-98. (Pubitemid 44218704)
51. Turner GR, McIntosh AR, Levine B. Prefrontal compensatory engagement in TBI is due to altered functional engagement of existing networks and not functional reorganization. FNSYS 2011; 5:9.
52. Stevens MC, Lovejoy D, Kim J, et al. Multiple resting state network functional connectivity abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2012; 6:293-318.
53. Levine B, Cabeza R, McIntosh AR, et al. Functional reorganisation of memory after traumatic brain injury: a study with H(2)(15)0 positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2002; 73:173-181.
54. Newsome MR, Steinberg JL, Scheibel RS, et al. Effects of traumatic brain injury on working memory-related brain activation in adolescents. Neuropsychology 2008; 22:419-425. (Pubitemid 351992888)
55. Witt ST, Lovejoy DW, Pearlson GD, Stevens MC. Decreased prefrontal cortex activity in mild traumatic brain injury during performance of an auditory oddball task. Brain Imaging Behav 2010; 4:232-247.
56. Sharp DJ, Beckmann CF, Greenwood R, et al. Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2011; 134:2233-2247
57. Hillary FG, Slocomb J, Hills EC, et al. Changes in resting connectivity during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury. Int J Psychophysiol 2011; 82:115-123.
58. Mayer AR, Mannell MV, Ling J, et al. Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32:1825-1835.
59. Caeyenberghs K, Wenderoth N, Smits-Engelsman BC, et al. Neural correlates of motor dysfunction in children with traumatic brain injury: exploration of compensatory recruitment patterns. Brain 2009; 132:684-694.
60. Boly M, Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30:2393-2400.
61. Norton L, Hutchison RM, Young GB, et al. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients. Neurology 2012; 78:175-181.
62. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ, et al. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in noncommunicative braindamaged patients. Brain 2010; 133:161-171.
63. Greicius MD, Kiviniemi V, Tervonen O, et al. Persistent default-mode network connectivity during light sedation. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29:839-847. (Pubitemid 351813085)
64. Cauda F, Micon BM, Sacco K, et al. Disrupted intrinsic functional connectivity in the vegetative state. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2009; 80:429-431.
65. Shumskaya E, Andriessen TM, Norris DG, Vos PE. Abnormal whole-brain functional networks in homogeneous acute mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2012; 79:175-182.
66. Kasahara M, Menon DK, Salmond CH, et al. Altered functional connectivity in the motor network after traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2010; 75:168-176.
67. Naunheim RS, Treaster M, English J, et al. Use of brain electrical activity to quantify traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. Brain Injury 2010; 24:1324-1329.
68. Kane NM, Moss TH, Curry SH, Butler SR. Quantitative electroencephalographic evaluation of nonfatal and fatal traumatic coma. Electroen Clin Neuro 1998; 106:244-250. (Pubitemid 28157129)
69. McCreaM, Prichep L, Powell MR, et al. Acute effects and recovery after sportrelated concussion: a neurocognitive and quantitative brain electrical activity study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010; 25:283-292.
70. Prichep LS, McCrea M, Barr W, Powell M, Chabot RJ. Time course of clinical and electrophysiological recovery after sport-related concussion. J Head Trauma Rehab 2012; [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 22588360.
71. Huang MX, Nichols S, Robb A, et al. An automatic MEG low-frequency source imaging approach for detecting injuries in mild and moderate TBI patients with blast and nonblast causes. Neuroimage 2012; 61:1067-1082.
72. Huang MX, Theilmann RJ, Robb A, et al. Integrated imaging approach with MEG and DTI to detect mild traumatic brain injury in military and civilian patients. J Neurotrauma 2009; 26:1213-1226.
73. Castellanos NP, Paul N, Ordonez VE, et al. Reorganization of functional connectivity as a correlate of cognitive recovery in acquired brain injury. Brain 2010; 133:2365-2381.
74. Mayer AR, Ling J, Mannell MV, et al. A prospective diffusion tensor imaging study in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2010; 74:643-650.
75. Bendlin BB, Ries ML, Lazar M, et al. Longitudinal changes in patients with traumatic brain injury assessed with diffusion-tensor and volumetric imaging. Neuroimage 2008; 42:503-514.
76. Urakami Y. Relationship between, sleep spindles and clinical recovery in patients with traumatic brain injury: a simultaneous EEG and MEG study. Clin EEG Neurosci 2012; 43:39-47.
77. Bales JW, Wagner AK, Kline AE, Dixon CE. Persistent cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A dopamine hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Res 2009; 33:981-1003.
78. Whyte J, Hart T, Vaccaro M, et al. Effects of methylphenidate on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury: a multidimensional, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2004; 83:401-420. (Pubitemid 38658128)
79. Kim J, Whyte J, Patel S, et al. Methylphenidate modulates sustained attention and cortical activation in survivors of traumatic brain injury: a perfusion fMRI study. Psychopharmacology 2012; 222:47-57.