Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage

Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 59-74

  Feteris, Eveline ^a   Groarke, Leo ^a   Plug, José ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938143211     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1075/z.163.05fet     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Birdsell, D. & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and advocacy, 33, 1-10.
2. Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19-43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Blair, J. Anthony (1996). The possibility and actuality of visual arguments, Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (1), 23-39.
4. Eemeren, F.H. van (2010). Strategic manoeuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Eemeren, F.H. van & Houtlosser, P. (2006). Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation, 20 (4) 377-380.
8. Eemeren, F.H. van & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Seizing the occasion: Parameters for analysing ways of strategic manoeuvring. In F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard, B. Garssen (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 375-381). Amsterdam: SicSat.
9. Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.
10. Garssen, B.J. (2009). Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In F.H. van Eemeren & B.J. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering onproblems of argumentation. Twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 133-140). Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Groarke, L. (1998). Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic 18 (2&3) 105-129.
12. Groarke, L. (2002). Towards a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In F.H. van Eemeren (Ed.) Advances in Pragma-dialectics (pp. 137-152). Amsterdam: SicSat.
13. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
14. Medhurst, M.J. & DeSousa, M.A. (1981). Political Cartoons as a rhetorical form: A Taxonomy of Graphic Discourse. Communication Monographs. 48 (3) 197-236.
15. Schilperoord, J. & Maes, A. (2009). Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Searle, J.R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Shelley, C. (1996). Rhetorical and demonstrative modes of visual argument: Looking at images of human evolution, Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (2) 53-68.
18. Shelley, C. (2001). Aspects of visual argument: A study of the March of Progress. Informal Logic 2 85-96.
19. Walton, D., Macagno, F. & Reed, C. (2008). The death of argument. Dordrecht: Kluwer.