Comparing the Incomparable: Figurative Analogies in a Dialectical Testing Procedure

Argumentation Library

Volumn 14, Issue , 2009, Pages 133-140

  Garssen, Bart ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Argument Scheme; Camera Surveillance; Figurative Analogy; Probative Force; Strategic Manoeuvring

Indexed keywords

EID: 85094978500     PISSN: 15667650     EISSN: 22151907     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. Doury, M. (2008). Argument schemes typologies in practice: The case of comparative arguments. (This volume).
2. Fearnside, W. W., & Holther, W. B. (1959). Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Govier, T. (1987). Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht: Foris.
4. Hastings, A. C. (1962). A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
5. Kienpointner, M. (1992). Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmunstern. Stug-gart: Fromann-Holzboog.
6. McBurney, J. H., & G. E. Mills (1964). Argumentation and Debate. Techniques of a Free Society. New York: The Macmillan Company.
7. Perelman, Ch., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958)
8. Schellens, P. J. (1985). Redelijke Argumenten. Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers [Reasonable arguments. A study on norms for critical readers]. Dordrecht: Foris.
9. Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Whately, R. (1846/1963). Elements of Rhetoric. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.