Morphology in the Digital Age: Integrating High-Resolution Description of Structural Alterations With Phenotypes and Genotypes

Seminars in Nephrology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 266-278

  Nast, Cynthia C ^a   Lemley, Kevin V ^b   Hodgin, Jeffrey B ^c   Bagnasco, Serena ^d   Avila Casado, Carmen ^e   Hewitt, Stephen M ^f   Barisoni, Laura ^g  

^a CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital pathology; Glomerulus; NEPTUNE; Renal pathology; Virtual microscopy; Virtual slide; Whole slide imaging

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONVENTIONAL LIGHT MICROSCOPY; DIGITAL IMAGING; GENOTYPE; GLASS SLIDE ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION STORAGE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY DISEASE; MICROSCOPY; MORPHOMETRICS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING; KIDNEY; KIDNEY DISEASES; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

GENOTYPE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KIDNEY; KIDNEY DISEASES; MICROSCOPY; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84937969333     PISSN: 02709295     EISSN: 15584488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2015.04.006     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Iversen P., Brun C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Am J Med 1951, 11:324-330.
2. Kark R., Muehrcke R. Biopsy of kidney in prone position. Lancet 1954, 263:1047-1049.
3. Cameron JS, Hicks J. The introduction of renal biopsy into nephrology from 1901 to 1961: a paradigm of the forming of nephrology by technology. Am J Nephrol. 1997;17:347-58.
4. Jie-Liu Li XY, Zhao Y.Q., et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in Chinese patients with pulmonary mixed type adenocarcinoma: relationship between histologic subtypes, TITF-1/SP-A expressions and EGFR mutations. Pathol Res Pract 2014, 210:176-181.
5. Luinetti O., Fiocca R., Villani L., et al. Genetic pattern, histological structure, and cellular phenotype in early and advanced gastric cancers: evidence for structure-related genetic subsets and for loss of glandular structure during progression of some tumors. Hum Pathol 1998, 29:702-709.
6. Sethi S., Fervenza F.C. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: pathogenetic heterogeneity and proposal for a new classification. Semin Nephrol 2011, 31:341-348.
7. Patrakka J., Kestilä M., Wartiovaara J., et al. Congenital nephrotic syndrome (NPHS1): features resulting from different mutations in Finnish patients. Kidney Int 2000, 58:972-980.
8. Lenkkeri U., Männikkö M., McCready P., et al. Structure of the gene for congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type (NPHS1) and characterization of mutations. Am J Hum Genet 1999, 64:51-61.
9. Koziell A., Grech V., Hussain S., et al. Genotype/phenotype correlations of NPHS1 and NPHS2 mutations in nephrotic syndrome advocate a functional inter-relationship in glomerular filtration. Hum Mol Genet 2002, 11:379-388.
10. Trautmann A., Bodria M., Ozaltin F., et al. Spectrum of steroid-resistant and congenital nephrotic syndrome in children: the PodoNet registry cohort. Clin J Am Soc Neprhol 2015, 10:592-600.
11. Bullich G., Trujillano D., Santín S., et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: mutations in multiple glomerular genes may influence disease severity. Eur J Hum Genet 2014, [Epub ahead of print].
12. Lovric S., Fang H., Vega-Warner V., et al. Rapid detection of monogenic causes of childhood-onset steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014, 9:1109-1116.
13. Hildebrandt F. Genetic kidney diseases. Lancet 2010, 375:1287-1295.
14. Sampson M.G., Hodgin J.B., Kretzler M. Defining nephrotic syndrome from an integrative genomics perspective. Pediatr Nephrol 2015, 30:51-63.
15. Freedman B.I., Murea M. Target organ damage in African American hypertension: role of APOL1. Curr Hypertens Rep 2012, 14:21-28.
16. Lv J., Hou W., Zhou X., et al. Interaction between PLA2R1 and HLA-DQA1 variants associates with anti-PLA2R antibodies and membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013, 24:1323-1329.
17. Barisoni L., Nast C.C., Jennette J.C., et al. Digital pathology evaluation in the multicenter Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013, 8:1449-1459.
18. Barisoni L., Jennette J.C., Colvin R., et al. Novel quantitative method to evaluate globotriaosylceramide inclusions in renal peritubular capillaries by virtual microscopy in patients with Fabry disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012, 136:816-824.
19. Mroz P., Parwani A.V., Kulesza P. Central pathology review for phase III clinical trials: the enabling effect of virtual microscopy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013, 137:492-495.
20. Brachtel E., Yagi Y. Digital imaging in pathology--current applications and challenges. J Biophotonics 2012, 5:327-335.
21. Treanor D., Gallas B., Gavrielides A., Hewitt A. Evaluating whole slide imaging: a working group opportunity. J Pathol Inform 2015, 6:4.
22. Pantanowitz L., Sinard J.H., Henricks W.H., et al. Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013, 137:1710-1722.
23. Gavrielides M.A., Conway C., O'Flaherty N., Gallas B.D., Hewitt S.M. Observer performance in the use of digital and optical microscopy for the interpretation of tissue-based biomarkers. Anal Cell Pathol 2014, 2014:157308.
24. Ordi J., Castillo P., Saco A., et al. Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a University Hospital. J Clin Pathol 2015, 68:33-39.
25. Furness P. A randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of internet-based telepathology compared with conventional microscopy. Histopathology 2007, 50:266-273.
26. Viera A.J., Garrett J.M. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005, 37:360-363.
27. Bartlett J.W., Frost C. Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008, 31:466-475.
28. Jen K.Y., Olson J.L., Brodsky S., et al. Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies. Hum Pathol 2013, 44:888-894.
29. Ozluk Y., Blanco P.L., Mengel M., et al. Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology. Clin Transplant 2012, 26:336-344.
30. Nelson D., Ziv A., Bandali K.S. Going glass to digital: virtual microscopy as a simulation-based revolution in pathology and laboratory science. J Clin Pathol 2012, 65:877-881.
31. Weinstein R.S., Graham A.R., Richter L.C., et al. Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Hum Pathol 2009, 40:1057-1069.
32. Weening J.J., D'Agati V.D., Schwartz M.M., et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney Int 2004, 65:521-530.
33. Roberts I.S., Cook H.T., Troyanov S., et al. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int 2009, 76:546-556.
34. D'Agati V.D., Fogo A.B., Bruijn J.A., Jennette J.C. Pathologic classification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a working proposal. Am J Kidney Dis 2004, 43:368-382.
35. Tervaert T.W., Mooyaart A.L., Amann K., et al. Pathologic classification of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010, 21:556-563.
36. Berden A.E., Ferrario F., Hagen E.C., et al. Histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010, 21:1628-1636.
37. Haas M., Rastaldi M.P., Fervenza F.C. Histologic classification of glomerular diseases: clinicopathologic correlations, limitations exposed by validation studies, and suggestions for modification. Kidney Int 2014, 85:779-793.
38. Barisoni L., Troost J., Bagnasco S., et al. Reproducibility of the NEPTUNE digital pathology morphologic profiling of NS. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014, 25:744A.
39. Rosenberg A., Palmer M., Merlino L., et al. The NEPTUNE digital pathology protocol increases accuracy in glomerular number assessment. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014, 2014:955A.
40. Gadegbeku C.A., Gipson D.S., Holzman L.B., et al. Design of the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) to evaluate primary glomerular nephropathy by a multidisciplinary approach. Kidney Int 2013, 83:749-756.
41. Nast C., Barisoni L., Troost J., et al. Glomerular descriptors enhance standard renal biopsy diagnoses. J Am Soc Neprhol 2013, 24:824A.
42. Hodgin J., Bitzer M., Wickman L., et al. Glomerular aging. A podometric perspective. J Am Soc Neprhol 2015, [Epub ahead of print].
43. Lemley K., Bagnasco S., Nast C., et al. Morphometry on baseline biopsies predicts early GFR changes in nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014, 25:955A.
44. Reiser J., Nast C.C., Alachkar N. Permeability factors in focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2014, 21:417-421.
45. Spinale J., Mariani L., Kapoor S., et al. A reassessment of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in glomerular disease. Kidney Int 2015, 87:564-574.
46. Pantanowitz L. Digital images and the future of digital pathology. J Pathol Inform 2010, 1:15.