Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies

Human Pathology

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 888-894

  Jen, Kuang Yu ^a   Olson, Jean L ^a   Brodsky, Sergey ^b   Zhou, Xin J ^c,d   Nadasdy, Tibor ^b   Laszik, Zoltan G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Renal Path Diagnostics Pathologists BioMedical Laboratories   (United States)

^d BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Allograft; Diagnostic reliability; Digital whole slide images; Kidney; Renal biopsy; Telepathology; Transplant

Indexed keywords

GLASS;

ACUTE GRAFT REJECTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY BIOPSY; WHOLE SLIDE IMAGE;

BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TELEPATHOLOGY; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 84876494036     PISSN: 00468177     EISSN: 15328392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J. Ramey, K.M. Fung, and L.A. Hassell Use of mobile high-resolution device for remote frozen section evaluation of whole slide images J Pathol Inform 2 2011 41
2. M.A. Fallon, D.C. Wilbur, and M. Prasad Ovarian frozen section diagnosis: use of whole-slide imaging shows excellent correlation between virtual slide and original interpretations in a large series of cases Arch Pathol Lab Med 134 2010 1020 1023
3. P.V. Gould, and S. Saikali A comparison of digitized frozen section and smear preparations for intraoperative neurotelepathology Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 35 2012 85 91
4. L. Pantanowitz, P.N. Valenstein, and A.J. Evans Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology J Pathol Inform 2 2011 36
5. K. Isse, A. Lesniak, K. Grama, B. Roysam, M.I. Minervini, and A.J. Demetris Digital transplantation pathology: combining whole slide imaging, multiplex staining and automated image analysis Am J Transplant 12 2012 27 37
6. S. Al-Janabi, A. Huisman, and A. Vink Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of gastrointestinal tract pathology: a feasibility study Hum Pathol 43 2012 702 707
7. S. Al-Janabi, A. Huisman, and A. Vink Whole slide images for primary diagnostics in dermatopathology: a feasibility study J Clin Pathol 65 2012 152 158
8. C. Chargari, E. Comperat, and N. Magne Prostate needle biopsy examination by means of virtual microscopy Pathol Res Pract 207 2011 366 369
9. P. Harnden, D. Coleman, S. Moss, S. Kodikara, N.R. Griffin, and J. Melia Evaluation of the use of digital images for a national prostate core external quality assurance scheme Histopathology 59 2011 703 709
10. P. Furness A randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of internet-based telepathology compared with conventional microscopy Histopathology 50 2007 266 273 (Pubitemid 46046396)
11. L.C. Racusen, K. Solez, and R.B. Colvin The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology Kidney Int 55 1999 713 723 (Pubitemid 29082898)
12. K. Solez, R.B. Colvin, and L.C. Racusen Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions Am J Transplant 8 2008 753 760 (Pubitemid 351347767)
13. J.L. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters Psychol Bull 76 1971 378 382
14. K.L. Gwet Handbook of inter-rater reliability 2010 Advanced Analytics, LLC Gaithersburg, MD
15. J.R. Landis, and G.G. Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1977 159 174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
16. N. Marcussen, T.S. Olsen, H. Benediktsson, L. Racusen, and K. Solez Reproducibility of the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology. Inter- and intraobserver variation Transplantation 60 1995 1083 1089
17. F.V. Veronese, R.C. Manfro, and F.R. Roman Reproducibility of the Banff classification in subclinical kidney transplant rejection Clin Transplant 19 2005 518 521 (Pubitemid 40990663)
18. J. Gough, D. Rush, and J. Jeffery Reproducibility of the Banff schema in reporting protocol biopsies of stable renal allografts Nephrol Dial Transplant 17 2002 1081 1084 (Pubitemid 34746212)
19. Y. Ozluk, P.L. Blanco, M. Mengel, K. Solez, P.F. Halloran, and B. Sis Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology Clin Transplant 26 2012 336 344