Improving value in musculoskeletal care delivery AOA critical issues

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

Volumn 97, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 769-774

  Wei, David H ^a   Hawker, Gillian A ^b   Jevsevar, David S ^c   Bozic, Kevin J ^d  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; COST CONTROL; DISEASE REGISTRY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; SHARED DECISION MAKING; UNITED STATES; ECONOMICS; MEDICAL FEE; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PURCHASING; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRENDS;

CANADA; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEE-FOR-SERVICE PLANS; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; UNITED STATES; VALUE-BASED PURCHASING;

EID: 84937965093     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00841     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363 (26):2477-81. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
2. Malchau H, Garellick G, Eisler T, Kärrholm J, Herberts P. Presidential guest address: the Swedish Hip Registry: increasing the sensitivity by patient outcome data. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:19-29.
3. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Söderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(Suppl 2):2-20.
4. Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):867-75.
5. Lacny S, Bohm E, Hawker G, Powell J, Marshall DA. Disjointed? Assessing the comparability of hip replacement registries to improve the monitoring of outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 2014 World Congress on Osteoarthritis; 2014 April 24-27. Paris, France: Osteoarthritis Research Society International; 2014. p S213-4.
6. Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3482-8.
7. Gordon M, Paulsen A, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Pedersen AB, Rolfson O. Factors influencing health-related quality of life after total hip replacement-a comparison of data from the Swedish and Danish hip arthroplasty registers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:316. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
8. Lindgren JV, Wretenberg P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Rolfson O. Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 42, 233 patients. Bone Joint J. 2014 May;96-B(5):590-6.
9. Jameson SS, Mason J, Baker P, Gregg PJ, McMurtry IA, Deehan DJ, Reed MR. A comparison of surgical approaches for primary hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and early revision using linked na-tional databases. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1248-1255.e1. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10. Jameson SS, Mason JM, Baker PN, Elson DW, Deehan DJ, Reed MR. The impact of body mass index on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications following primary hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Oct;29(10):1889-98. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
11. Porter ME, Lee T. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2013 Oct;91(10):50-70.
12. Ranawat AS, Nunley R, Bozic K. Executive summary: value-based purchasing and technology assessment in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467 (10):2556-60. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
13. Slover J, Shue J, Koenig K. Shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1046-53.
14. Stacey D, Hawker G, Dervin G, Tugwell P, Boland L, Pomey MP, O'Connor AM, Taljaard M. Decision aid for patients considering total knee arthroplasty with preference report for surgeons: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:54. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
15. Bozic KJ, Belkora J, Chan V, Youm J, Zhou T, Dupaix J, Bye AN, Braddock CH 3rd, Chenok KE, Huddleston JI 3rd. Shared decision making in patients with osteoar-thritis of the hip and knee: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 18;95(18):1633-9.
16. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160, 000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Apr;71(2):111-21.
17. Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT. Analysis of 16, 192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2090-8. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
18. Lee MJ, Cizik AM, Hamilton D, Chapman JR. Predicting surgical site infection after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry. Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2112-7. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
19. Soderlund N, Kent J, Lawyer P, Larsson S. Progress toward value-based health care: lessons from 12 countries. Boston Consulting Group. 2012. Accessed 2015 Jan 8.
20. Gooch KL, Smith D, Wasylak T, Faris PD, Marshall DA, Khong H, Hibbert JE, Parker RD, Zernicke RF, Beaupre L, Pearce T, Johnston DW, Frank CB. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Apr;25(2):113-23.
21. Bohm ER, Dunbar MJ, Bourne R. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry-what have we learned? Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):119-21.
22. Laugesen MJ, Glied SA. Higher fees paid to US physicians drive higher spending for physician services compared to other countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1647-56.
23. Schroeder SA, Frist W; National Commission on Physician Payment Reform. Phasing out fee-for-service payment. N Engl J Med. 2013 May23;368(21):2029-32. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
24. Orszag PR, Ellis P. The challenge of rising health care costs-a view from the Congressional Budget Office. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1793-5.
25. McIntyre LF. Exploring new practice models delivering orthopedic care: can we significantly decrease delivery costs and improve quality? Sports Med Arthrosc. 2013 Sep;21(3):152-4.
26. Froimson MI, Rana A, White RE Jr, Marshall A, Schutzer SF, Healy WL, Naas P, Daubert G, Iorio R, Parsley B. Bundled payments for care improvement initiative: the next evolution of payment formulations: AAHKS Bundled Payment Task Force. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8)(Suppl):157-65.
27. Casale AS, Paulus RA, Selna MJ, Doll MC, Bothe AE Jr, McKinley KE, Berry SA, Davis DE, Gilfillan RJ, Hamory BH, Steele GD Jr. "ProvenCareSM": a provider-driven pay-for-performance program for acute episodic cardiac surgical care. Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):613-21; discussion 621-3.
28. Calsyn M, Lee EO. Alternatives to fee-for-service payments in health care: moving from volume to value. Center for American Progress. 2012. http://cdn. americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/FeeforService4.pdf. Accessed 2015 Jan 8.
29. Edwards ST, Bitton A, Hong J, Landon BE. Patient-centered medical home initiatives expanded in 2009-13: providers, patients, and payment incentives increased. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Oct;33(10):1823-31.
30. Marchildon GP. Canada: health system review. Health Systems in Transition. 2013;15(1):1-179. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2013.
31. http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf-file/0011/181955/e96759.pdf. Accessed 2015 Jan 1.
32. Hutchison B, Levesque JF, Strumpf E, Coyle N. Primary health care in Canada: systems in motion. Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):256-88.
33. Strumpf E, Levesque JF, Coyle N, Hutchison B, Barnes M, Wedel RJ. Innovative and diverse strategies toward primary health care reform: lessons learned from the Canadian experience. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Mar;25(Suppl 1):S27-33.
34. Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):207-14.
35. Hibbard JH, Greene J, Overton V. Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients' 'scores'. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):216-22.
36. Collar RM, Shuman AG, Feiner S, McGonegal AK, Heidel N, Duck M, McLean SA, Billi JE, Healy DW, Bradford CR. Lean management in academic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jun;214(6):928-36.
37. Lunardini D, Arington R, Canacari EG, Gamboa K, Wagner K, McGuire KJ. Lean principles to optimize instrument utilization for spine surgery in an academic medical center: an opportunity to standardize, cut costs, and build a culture of improvement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Sep 15;39(20):1714-7.
38. Brinker MR, O'Connor DP. Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3426-36.
39. Lievens Y, van den Bogaert W, Kesteloot K. Activity-based costing: a practical model for cost calculation in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Oct 1; 57(2):522-35.
40. Ross TK. Analyzing health care operations using ABC. J Health Care Finance. 2004 Spring;30(3):1-20.
41. Demeere N, Stouthuysen K, Roodhooft F. Time-driven activity-based costing in an outpatient clinic environment: development, relevance and managerial impact. Health Policy. 2009 Oct;92(2-3):296-304. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
42. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Nov;82(11):131-40.
43. Lansky D, Nwachukwu BU, Bozic KJ. Using financial incentives to improve value in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1027-37.
44. Hallstrom B, Hughes RE, Cowen ME, Singal B, Igrisan R. MARCQI: Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. http://marcqi.org/index.html. Accessed 2014 Dec 6.
45. Paxton EW, Inacio M, Slipchenko T, Fithian DC. The Kaiser Permanente national total joint replacement registry. Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):12-6.
46. Smith MA, Smith WT. The American Joint Replacement Registry. Orthop Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;31(5):296-9; quiz 300-1.
47. Franklin PD, Allison JJ, Ayers DC. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1217-8.