Decision aid for patients considering total knee arthroplasty with preference report for surgeons: A pilot randomized controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Stacey, Dawn ^a,b   Hawker, Gillian ^c   Dervin, Geoffrey ^b   Tugwell, Peter ^a,b   Boland, Laura ^a,b   Pomey, Marie Pascale ^d   O'Connor, Annette M ^a,b   Taljaard, Monica ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision quality; Joint arthroplasty; Osteoarthritis; Patient decision aids; Patient preferences; Wait times

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT DECISION AID; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAMPHLETS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PILOT PROJECTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; TEACHING MATERIALS; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; VIDEO RECORDING; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 84896700272     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-54     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, Twoheed T, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P, Arthritis Care Res 2012 64 465 474
2. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB, JAMA 1996 275 858 865 10.1001/jama.1996.03530350040032 8596224
3. Costs and outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Liang MH, Larson M, Thompson M, Eaton H, McNamara E, Katz R, Taylor J, Arthritis Rheum 1984 27 522 529 10.1002/art.1780270507 6721884
4. National Institutes of Health (NIH), NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement-Total Knee Replacement 2003 http://consensus.nih.gov/2003/ 2003TotalKneeReplacement117html.htm
5. Waiting times and patient perspectives for total hip and knee arthroplasty in rural and urban Ontario. Snider MG, MacDonald SJ, Pototschnik R, Can J Surg 2005 48 355 360 16248132
6. Wait time Alliance, Canadians still waiting too long for health care: Report card on wait times in Canada 2013 http://www.gov.nl.ca/HaveYouHeard/wta. pdf
7. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Wait Times 2013 http://www.waittimes.net/Surgerydi/en/PublicMain.aspx?view=0&Type=0
8. Prioritization of patients on waiting lists for hip and knee replacement: validation of a priority criteria tool. Conner-Spady B, Estey A, Arnett G, McGurran J, Noseworthy T, Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004 20 509 515 15609803
9. Determinants of patient and surgeon perspectives on maximum acceptable waiting times for hip and knee arthroplasty. Conner-Spady B, Estey A, Arnett G, Ness K, McGurran J, Bear R, Noseworthy T, Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project, J Health Serv Res Policy 2005 10 84 90 10.1258/1355819053559155 15871767
10. Development of a regional clinical pathway for total hip replacement in a rural health network. Meleskie J, Wilson K, Healthc Q Online Case Study 2004 1 7 Available at: http://www.akaz.ba/Klinicki-put/Dokumenti/CS1004Meleskie.pdf
11. Cipriano LE, Chesworth BM, Anderson CK, Zaric GS, Estimating the effect of total joint replacement wait time strategies in Ontario using simulation modeling Boston, MA Presented at the Society for Medical Decision Making Annual Meeting. 2006
12. Impact of a surgical screening clinic for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a descriptive study. Klett MJ, Frankovich R, Dervin GF, Stacey D, Clin J Sport Med 2012 22 3 274 277 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318248ed24 22382432
13. In the queue for total joint replacement: patients' perspective on waiting times. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Arshinoff R, Bell M, Williams JI, Naylor CD, the Ontario Hip and Knee Replacement Project Team, J Eval Clin Pract 1998 4 63 74 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1998.t01-1-00006.x 9524913
14. Trends and geographic variations in major surgery for degenerative diseases of the hip, knee, and spine. Weinstein JN, Bronner KK, Morgan TS, Wennberg JE, Health Aff 2004 web exclusive &22ar-81-Var-89
15. Perceptions of, and willingness to consider, total joint arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of individuals with disabling hip and knee arthritis. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Badley EM, Coyte PC, Arthritis Rheum 2004 51 635 641 10.1002/art.20524 15334438
16. Surgical services. Williams J, Shipton D, Badley EM, Hawker G, Kreder H, DeBoer D, Guan J, Mohomed N, Arthritis and Related Conditions in Ontario: ICES Research Atlas Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Badley EM, Glazier RH, 2004
17. Who, when, and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient's perspective. Hawker GA, Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006 18 526 530 16896295
18. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN, J Rheumatol 2002 29 1273 1279 12064846
19. Ethnic variation in knee replacement: patient preferences or uninformed disparity? Suarez-Almazor ME, Souchek J, Kelly PA, O'Malley K, Byrne M, Richardson M, Pak C, Arch Intern Med 2005 165 1117 1124 10.1001/archinte.165.10. 1117 15911724
20. Getting back to the future: a grounded theory study of the patient perspective of total knee joint arthroplasty. Marcinkowski K, Wong VG, Dignam D, Orthop Nurs 2005 24 202 209 15928530
21. Expectation and outlook: the impact of patient preference on arthritis care among African Americans. Figaro MK, Williams-Russo P, Allegrante JP, J Ambul Care Manage 2005 28 41 48 10.1097/00004479-200501000-00006 15682960
22. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 1 335
23. Shared decision making in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Bozic KJ, Belkora J, Chan V, Youm J, Zhou T, Dupaix J, Bye AN, Braddock III CH, Chenok KE, Huddleston III JI, J Bone Joint Surg 2013 95 1633 1639 10.2106/JBJS.M.00004 24048550
24. Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty. de Achaval S, Fraenkel L, Volk RJ, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME, Arthritis Care Res 2012 64 229 237 10.1002/acr.20646
25. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T, International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration, Br Med J 2006 333 417 422 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE
26. Improving shared decision making in osteoarthritis. Stacey D, Hawker G, Dervin G, Tomek I, Cochran N, Tugwell P, O'Connor A, Br Med J 2008 336 954 955 10.1136/bmj.39520.699190.94
27. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH, BMC Med Res Methodol 2010 10 1 10 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 20053272
28. Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation. Sepucha KR, Stacey D, Clay CF, Change Y, Cosenza C, Dervin G, Dorrwachter J, Feibelmann S, Katz JN, Kearing SA, Malchua H, Taljaard M, Tomek I, Tugwell P, Levin CA, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011 12 1 12 21199576
29. Validation of SURE, a four-item clinical checklist for detecting decisional conflict in patients. Ferron Parayre A, Labrecque M, Rousseau M, Turcotte S, Legare F, Med Decis Making 2013 Online First June 17:1-9
30. Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Bennett C, Graham ID, Kristjansson E, Kearing SA, Clay KF, O'Connor AM, Patient Educ Couns 2010 78 130 133 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.012 19560303
31. Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Sepucha KR, Fowler FJ, Mulley AG, Health Aff 2004 Suppl &22AR54 VAR62
32. Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? Collins ED, Moore CP, Clay KF, Kearing SA, O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Barth RJ, Sepucha KR, J Clin Oncol 2009 27 519 525 19114703
33. Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Bekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG, Patient Educ Couns 2003 50 323 329 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00056-9 12900106
34. Validation of a decision regret scale. Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, Feldman-Stewart D, Med Decis Making 2003 23 281 292 10.1177/0272989X03256005 12926578