Measuring Individual Differences in the Perfect Automation Schema

Human Factors

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 740-753

  Merritt, Stephanie M ^a   Unnerstall, Jennifer L ^a   Lee, Deborah ^a   Huber, Kelli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

all or none thinking; automation; high expectations; perfect automation schema; propensity to trust machines; trust

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ALL-OR-NONE THINKING; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; FACTOR STRUCTURE; HIGH EXPECTATIONS; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; PERFECT AUTOMATION SCHEMA; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; TRUST;

AUTOMATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTOMATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTOMATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937933060     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720815581247     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. de Vries P., Midden C., Bouwhuis D., (2003). The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 719-735.
2. Dzindolet M. T., Peterson S. A., Pomranky R. A., Pierce L. G., Beck H. P., (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 697-718. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00038-7
3. Dzindolet M. T., Pierce L. G., Beck H. P., Dawe L. A., (2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, 44, 79-97.
4. Fiske S., (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert D., Fiske S., Lindzey G., (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 257-411). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
5. Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E., (1984). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
6. Fyock J., Stangor C., (1994). The role of memory biases in stereotype maintenance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 331-344.
7. Gilbert D. T., Hixon J. G., (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
8. Hastie R., Kumar P., (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
9. Lee J. D., Moray N., (1992). Trust, control strategies, and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
10. Lee J. D., See K. A., (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80.
11. Macrae C. N., Bodenhausen G. V., (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93-120.
12. Macrae C. N., Bodenhausen G. V., Milne A. B., Jetten J., (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817.
13. Madhavan P., Wiegmann D. A., (2007). Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 277-301. doi: 10.1080/14639220500337708
14. Merritt S., (2011). Affective processes in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 53, 356-370.
15. Merritt S. M., Heimbaugh H., LaChapell J., Lee D., (2013). I trust it, but I don't know why: Effects of implicit attitude toward automation on trust in an automated system. Human Factors, 55, 520-534. doi: 10.1177/0018720812465081
16. Merritt S. M., Ilgen D. R., (2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50 (2), 194-210.
17. Merritt S. M., Lee D., Unnerstall J., Huber K., (2014). Calibration of trust: Is it overrated? Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Moes M., Knox K., Pierce L. G., Beck H. P., (1999). Should I decide or let the machine decide for me? Poster presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Savannah, GA.
19. Moray N., Inagaki T., Itoh M., (2000). Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 44-58.
20. Parasuraman R., Miller C. A., (2004). Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47, 51-55.
21. Parasuraman R., Riley V., (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
22. Rovira E., McGarry K., Parasuraman R., (2007). Effects of imperfect automation of decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human Factors, 49, 76-87.
23. Schmitt N., Stults D. M., (1985). Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 367-373. doi: 10.1177/014662168500900405
24. Srull T. K., Wyer R. S. Jr., (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
25. Stangor C., McMillan D., (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
26. Wang L., Jamieson G. A., Hollands J. G., (2009). Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system. Human Factors, 51, 281-291.
27. Wickens C. D., Hollands J. G., (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Wiegmann D. A., Rich A., Zhang H., (2001). Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2, 352-367. doi: 10.1080/14639220110110306