메뉴 건너뛰기
F1000Research
Volumn 4, Issue , 2015, Pages
Open peer review at four STEM journals: An observational overview
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

EID: 84937931982     PISSN: 20461402     EISSN: 1759796X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.6005.2     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (23)
References (20)
  • 1
    • 84937931982 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview
    • Referee Report For
    • Binfield P: Referee Report For: Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview. F1000Res. 2015;4:6. 10.5256/f1000research.6426.r7269
    • (2015) F1000Res , vol.4 , pp. 6
    • Binfield, P.1
  • 2
    • 84885601101 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Who's afraid of peer review?
    • 24092725
    • Bohannon J: Who's afraid of peer review? Science. 2013;342(6154):60-65. 24092725 10.1126/science.342.6154.60
    • (2013) Science , vol.342 , Issue.6154 , pp. 60-65
    • Bohannon, J.1
  • 3
    • 78650312232 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Extending ArXiv.org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing
    • Boldt A: Extending ArXiv.org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing. J scholarly Publ. 2011;42(2):238-242. 10.3138/jsp.42.2.238
    • (2011) J scholarly Publ , vol.42 , Issue.2 , pp. 238-242
    • Boldt, A.1
  • 4
    • 77950646825 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study
    • Bornmann L Daniel HD: Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study. Learn Publ. 2010;23(2):124-131. 10.1087/20100207
    • (2010) Learn Publ , vol.23 , Issue.2 , pp. 124-131
    • Bornmann, L.1    Daniel, H.D.2
  • 5
    • 70049099503 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Signs of epistemic disruption: Transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal
    • Cope WW Kalantzis M: Signs of epistemic disruption: Transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal. First Monday. 2009;14(4-6). 10.5210/fm.v14i4.2309
    • (2009) First Monday , vol.14 , Issue.4-6
    • Cope, W.W.1    Kalantzis, M.2
  • 6
    • 77956541761 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer-to-peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority
    • Fitzpatrick K: Peer-to-peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority. Social Epistemology. 2010;24(3):161-179. 10.1080/02691728.2010.498929
    • (2010) Social Epistemology , vol.24 , Issue.3 , pp. 161-179
    • Fitzpatrick, K.1
  • 7
    • 84879767340 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature
    • Ford E: Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature. J scholarly Publ. 2013;44(4):311-326. 10.3138/jsp.44-4-001
    • (2013) J scholarly Publ , vol.44 , Issue.4 , pp. 311-326
    • Ford, E.1
  • 8
    • 79956171477 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Realizing the Power of Extelligence: A New Business Model for Academic Publishing
    • Reference Source
    • Friedman R Whitworth B Brownstein M: Realizing the Power of Extelligence: A New Business Model for Academic Publishing. Int J Technol Knol Soc. 2010;6(2):105-117. Reference Source
    • (2010) Int J Technol Knol Soc , vol.6 , Issue.2 , pp. 105-117
    • Friedman, R.1    Whitworth, B.2    Brownstein, M.3
  • 9
    • 0003864509 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer Review in Health Sciences (2nd ed.)
    • Reference Source, London: BMJ Books
    • Godlee F: Peer Review in Health Sciences (2nd ed.). London: BMJ Books.2003. Reference Source
    • (2003)
    • Godlee, F.1
  • 10
    • 77952323010 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Exploring a New Model for Preprint Server: A Case Study of CSPO
    • Hu C Zhang Y Chen G: Exploring a New Model for Preprint Server: A Case Study of CSPO. J Acad Libr. 2010;36(3):257-262. 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.010
    • (2010) J Acad Libr , vol.36 , Issue.3 , pp. 257-262
    • Hu, C.1    Zhang, Y.2    Chen, G.3
  • 11
    • 84855614450 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open and transparent: the review process of the Semantic Web journal
    • Janowicz K Hitzler P: Open and transparent: the review process of the Semantic Web journal. Learn Publ. 2012;25(1):48-55. 10.1087/20120107
    • (2012) Learn Publ , vol.25 , Issue.1 , pp. 48-55
    • Janowicz, K.1    Hitzler, P.2
  • 12
    • 80052461086 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should Biomedical Publishing Be "Opened Up'? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process
    • Lipworth W Kerridge IH Carter SM: Should Biomedical Publishing Be "Opened Up'? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process. J Bioeth Inq. 2011;8(3):267-280. 10.1007/s11673-011-9312-4
    • (2011) J Bioeth Inq , vol.8 , Issue.3 , pp. 267-280
    • Lipworth, W.1    Kerridge, I.H.2    Carter, S.M.3
  • 13
    • 84924991999 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Black Box, Pandora's Box or Virtual Toolbox? An Experiment in a Journal's Transparent Peer Review on the Web
    • Maharg P Duncan N: Black Box, Pandora's Box or Virtual Toolbox? An Experiment in a Journal's Transparent Peer Review on the Web. Int Rev Law Comput Tech. 2007;21(2):109-128. 10.1080/13600860701492104
    • (2007) Int Rev Law Comput Tech , vol.21 , Issue.2 , pp. 109-128
    • Maharg, P.1    Duncan, N.2
  • 14
    • 84928509236 scopus 로고
    • Is Justice Blind? An Inquiry into Peer Review
    • McGiffert M: Is Justice Blind? An Inquiry into Peer Review. Scholarly Publishing. 1988;20(1):43-48.
    • (1988) Scholarly Publishing , vol.20 , Issue.1 , pp. 43-48
    • McGiffert, M.1
  • 15
    • 84923445913 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer?
    • 25266119, 4191873
    • Moylan EC Harold S O'Neill C: Open, single-blind, double-blind: which peer review process do you prefer? BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;15(1):55. 25266119 10.1186/2050-6511-15-55 4191873
    • (2014) BMC Pharmacol Toxicol , vol.15 , Issue.1 , pp. 55
    • Moylan, E.C.1    Harold, S.2    O'Neill, C.3
  • 16
    • 85013569992 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality, certification and peer review
    • Reference Source
    • Mulligan A: Quality, certification and peer review. Information Services & Use. 2008;28(3-4):pp. 197-214. Reference Source
    • (2008) Information Services & Use , vol.28 , Issue.3-4 , pp. 197-214
    • Mulligan, A.1
  • 17
    • 84937931982 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview
    • Referee Report For
    • Perakakis P: Referee Report For: Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview. F1000Res. 2015;4:6. 10.5256/f1000research.6426.r7267
    • (2015) F1000Res , vol.4 , pp. 6
    • Perakakis, P.1
  • 18
    • 1942472653 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance
    • Pöschl U: Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance. Learn Publ. 2004;17(2):105-113. 10.1087/095315104322958481
    • (2004) Learn Publ , vol.17 , Issue.2 , pp. 105-113
    • Pöschl, U.1
  • 19
    • 77950008710 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interactive Open Access Peer Review: The Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Model
    • Reference Source
    • Pöschl U: Interactive Open Access Peer Review: The Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Model. Against the Grain. 2009;21(3):26-32. Reference Source
    • (2009) Against the Grain , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 26-32
    • Pöschl, U.1
  • 20
    • 84855209771 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Open-process academic publishing
    • Reference Source
    • Prug T: Open-process academic publishing. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization. 2010;10(1):40-63. Reference Source
    • (2010) Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization , vol.10 , Issue.1 , pp. 40-63
    • Prug, T.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.