Signs of epistemic disruption: Transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal

First Monday

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Cope, Bill ^a   Kalantzis, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70049099503     PISSN: 13960466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v14i4.2309     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Andrew Albanese, 2008. "Harvard slams Google settlement; Others react with caution," Library Journal (30 October), at http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6610115.html, accessed 16 March 2009.
2. Francis Bacon, 1620. The New Organon, digital version at http://www.constitution.org/bacon/nov_org.htm, accessed 16 March 2009.
3. Michel Bauwens, 2005. "The political economy of peer production," CTheory (1 December), http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499, accessed 16 March 2009.
4. Yochai Benkler, 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
5. Sherrie S. Bergman, 2006. "The scholarly communication movement: Highlights and recent developments," Collection Building, volume 25, pp. 108-128.
6. Carl T. Bergstrom and Theodore C. Bergstrom. 2006. "The economics of ecology journals," Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, volume 4, pp. 488-495, and at http://www.frontiersinecology.org/, accessed 16 March 2009.
7. Ted C. Bergstrom and Rosemarie Lavaty. 2007. "How often do economists self-archive?" Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucsbecon/bergstrom/2007a/, accessed 16 March 2009.
8. Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities, 2003. "Berlin declaration," at http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html, accessed 16 March 2009.
9. Bethesda statement on open access publishing, 2003. "Bethesda statement" (20 June), at http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm, accessed 16 March 2009.
10. Mario Biagioli, 2002. "From book censorship to academic peer review," Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures, volume 12, pp. 11-45.
11. Claire Bird and Martin Richardson. 2009. "Publishing journals under a hybrid subscription and open access model," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
12. Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Christoph Neuhaus, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2008. "Citation counts for research evaluation: Standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 93-102, and at http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/p93-102/, accessed 16 March 2009.
13. Tim Brody, Les Carr, Yves Gingras, Chawki Hajjem, Stevan Harnad, and Alma Swan. 2007. "Incentivizing the open access research Web: Publication-archiving, data-archiving and scientometrics," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/incentivizing-the-open-access-research-web, accessed 16 March 2009.
14. Howard I. Browman and Konstantinos I. Stergiou. 2008. "Factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 1-3.
15. J.C. Burnham, 1990. "The evolution of editorial peer review," Journal of the American Medical Association, volume 263 (9 March), and at http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/263/10/1323, accessed 16 March 2009.
16. Linda Butler, 2008. "Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: Quantitative performance measures in the Australian research quality framework," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 83-92.
17. Philip Campbell, 2008. "Escape from the impact factor," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 5-7.
18. Roger Clarke, 2007. "The cost profiles of alternative approaches to journal publishing," First Monday, volume 12, number 12 (December), http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2048/1906, accessed 16 March 2009.
19. Bill Cope, 2001. "Content development and rights in a digital environment," In: B. Cope and R. Freeman (editors). Digital rights management and content development: Technology drivers across the book production supply chain, from the creator to the consumer. Melbourne: Common Ground, pp. 3-16.
20. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, 2007. "New media, new learning," International Journal of Learning, volume 14, pp. 75-79.
21. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, 2004. "Text-made text," E-Learning, volume 1, pp. 198-282.
22. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, 2000b. Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge, p. 350.
23. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, 2000a. "Designs for social futures," In: B. Cope and K. Mary (editors). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge, pp. 203-234.
24. Iain D. Craig and Liz Ferguson, 2009. "Journals ranking and impact factors: How the performance of journals is measured," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
25. J. Eric Davies, 2009. "Libraries and the future of the journal: Dodging the crossfire in the e-revolution; or leading the charge?" In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
26. Mathias Dewatripont, Victor Ginsburgh, Patrick Legros, and Alexis Walckiers. 2006. Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe. Brussels: European Commission, and at http//ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf, accessed 16 March 2009.
27. Aaron S. Edlin and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 2004. "Exclusion or efficient pricing? The 'big deal' bundling of academic journals," University of California, Berkeley, at http://repositories.cdlib.org/blewp/art167/, accessed 16 March 2009.
28. James A. Evans, 2008. "Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship," Science, volume 321, number 5887 (18 July), pp. 395-399, and at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/321/5887/395, accessed 16 March 2009.
29. J. Lynn Fink and Philip E. Bourne. 2007. "Reinventing scholarly communication for the electronic age," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/reinventing-scholarly-communication-for-the-electronic-age/, accessed 16 March 2009.
30. Brian Fitzgerald and Kylie Pappalardo. 2007. "The law as cyberinfrastructure," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/the-law-as-cyberinfrastructure, accessed 16 March 2009.
31. Dominique Foray, 2004. The economics of knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
32. Alexander R. Galloway and Eugene Thacker. 2007. The exploit: A theory of networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Paul Ginsparg, 2007. "Next-generation implications of open access," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/next-generation-implications-of-open-access/, accessed 16 March 2009.
34. Jean-Claude Guédon, 2001, "In Oldenburg's long shadow: Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing,' Association of Research Libraries, at http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/mmproceedings/138guedon.shtml, accessed 16 March 2009.
35. Timo Hannay, 2007. "Web 2.0 in science," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/web-20-in-science/, accessed 16 March 2009.
36. Stevan Harnad, 2009. "The PostGutenberg open access journal," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
37. Stevan Harnad, 2008. "Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 103-107, and at http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/p103-107/, accessed 16 March 2009.
38. Anne-Wil K. Harzing and Ron van der Wal. 2008. "Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 61-73, and at http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/p61-73/, accessed 16 March 2009.
39. D.F. Horrobin, 1990. "The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation," Journal of the American Medical Association, volume 263, at http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/263/10/1438, accessed 16 March 2009.
40. Edmund Husserl, 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Translated and with an introduction by David Carr. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
41. John P.A. Ioannidis, 2005. "Why most published research findings are false," PLoS Medicine, volume 2, pp. 696-701.
42. Andrew Jakubowicz, 2009. "Beyond the static text: Multimedia interactivity in academic publishing," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
43. Tom Jefferson, Elizabeth Wager, and Frank Davidoff. 2002. "Measuring the quality of editorial peer review," Journal of the American Medical Association, volume 287, pp. 2786-2790, and at http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/287/21/2786, accessed 16 March 2009.
44. Horace Freeland Judson, 1994. "Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review," Journal of the American Medical Association, volume 272, pp. 92-94, and at http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/7_13_94/pv3112x.htm, accessed 16 March 2009.
45. Mary Kalantzis and Bill Cope. 2008. New learning: Elements of a science of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Cushla Kapitzke and Michael A. Peters. 2007. Global knowledge cultures. Rottherdam: Sense Publishers.
47. Kayvan Kousha and Mike Thelwall. 2007. "Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 58, number 7, pp. 1055-1065.
48. Gunther Kress, 2000. "Design and transformation: New theories of meaning," In: B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (editors). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge, pp. 153-161.
49. Peter A. Lawrence, 2008. "Lost in publication: How measurement harms science," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 9-11, and at http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/pp6/, accessed 16 March 2009.
50. Peter A. Lawrence, 2007. "The mismeasurement of science," Current Biology, volume 17, pp. 583-585.
51. Kirby Lee and Lisa Bero, 2006. "What authors, editors and reviewers should do to improve peer review," Nature, http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05007.html, accessed 16 March 2009.
52. Lawrence Lessig, 2008. Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin.
53. Lawrence Lessig, 2001. The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.
54. J.C.R. Linklider, 1965. Libraries of the future. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
55. Clifford Lynch, 2007. "The shape of the scientific article in the developing cyberinfrastructure," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/the-shape-of-the-scientific-article-in-the-developing-cyberinfrastructure, accessed 16 March 2009.
56. Michael A. Mabe and Mayur Amin. 2002. "Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde: Author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing," Aslib Proceedings, volume 54, pp. 149-157.
57. Mark J. McCabe, Aviv Nevo, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 2006. "The pricing of academic journals," University of California, Berkeley, at http://repositories.cdlib.org/blewp/art199/, accessed 16 March 2009.
58. Lokman I. Meho, 2007. "The rise and rise of citation analysis," Physics World, volume 20, pp. 32-36.
59. Barbara Meyers, 2004. "Peer review software: Has it made a mark on the world of scholarly journals?" Aries Systems Corporation, at http://www.editorialmanager.com/, accessed 16 March 2009.
60. Morgan Stanley, 2002. "Scientific publishing: Knowledge is power" (30 September), Morgan Stanley Equity Research Europe (London), and at http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/morganstanley.pdf, accessed 16 March 2009.
61. Sally Morris, 2009. "'The tiger in the corner': Perhaps journals will not be central to the lives of tomorrow's scholars?" In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
62. Michael Norris and Charles Oppenheim, 2007. "Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature," Journal of Informetrics, volume 1, number 2, pp. 161-169.
63. David W. Opderbeck, 2007. "The penguin's paradox: The political economy of international intellectual property and the paradox of open intellectual property models," Stanford Law & Policy Review, volume 18, number 1, pp. 101-160.
64. Open Society Institute, 2002. "Budapest Open Access Initiative," at http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml, accessed 16 March 2009.
65. Lee C. Van Orsdel and Kathleen Born, 2008. "Periodicals price survey 2008: Embracing openness," Library Journal (15 April), http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6547086.html?q=periodicals+price+survey+2008, accessed 16 March 2009.
66. Lee C. Van Orsdel and Kathleen Born. 2006. "Periodicals price survey 2006: Journals in the time of Google," Library Journal (15 April), http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6321722.html, accessed 16 March 2009.
67. D. Pauly and K.I. Stergiou. 2008. "Re-interpretation of 'influence weight' as a citation-based Index of New Knowledge (INK)," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 75-78.
68. James W. Pellegrino, Naomi Chudowsky, and Robert Glaser (editors), 2001. Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, and at http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309072727, accessed 16 March 2009.
69. Michael A. Peters, 2007. Knowledge economy, development and the future of higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
70. Michael A. Peters, 2009. "Academic publishing and the political economy of education journals," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
71. Michael A. Peters, Simon Marginson, and Peter Murphy. 2008. Creativity and the global knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang.
72. Angus Phillips, 2009. "Business models in journals publishing," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
73. José Luis González Quirós and Karim Gherab Martín. 2009. "Arguments for an open model of escience," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
74. Eric Raymond, 2001. The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastapol, Calif.: O'Reilly.
75. Fytton Rowland, 2002. "The peer-review process," Learned Publishing, volume 15, pp. 247-258, and at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/rowland.pdf, accessed 16 March 2009.
76. Joss Saunders and Simon Smith. 2009. "The future of copyright: What are the pressures on the present system?" In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
77. Robert Schroeder, 2007. "Pointing users toward citation searching: Using Google Scholar and Web of Science," Libraries and the Academy, volume 7, pp. 243-248.
78. Sarah L. Shreeves, 2009. "Cannot predict now: The role of repositories in the future of the journal," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
79. Kai Simons, 2008. "The misused impact factor," Science, volume 322, number 5899 (10 October), p. 165, and at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/322/5899/165, accessed 16 March 2009.
80. Pippa Smart, 2009. "The status and future of the African journal," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
81. Herbert Van de Sompel and Carl Lagoze. 2007. "Interoperability for the discovery, use, and re-use of units of scholarly communication," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/interoperability-for-the-discovery-use-and-re-use-of-units-of-scholarly-communication, accessed 16 March 2009.
82. Mike Sosteric, 1996. "Interactive peer review: A research note," Electronic Journal of Sociology, volume 2, number 1, at http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/EJS/vol002.001/SostericNote.vol002.001.html, accessed 16 March 2009.
83. Ray Spier, 2002. "The history of the peer-review process," Trends in Biotechnology, volume 20, pp. 357-358.
84. Richard Stallman, 2002a. Free software, free society: Selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston, Mass.: GNU Press.
85. Richard Stallman, 2002b. "The GNU project," at http://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html, accessed 16 March 2009.
86. Christine A. Stanley, 2007. "When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process," Educational Researcher, volume 36, pp. 14-24.
87. Peter Suber, 2007. "Trends favoring open access," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/trends-favoring-open-access/, accessed 16 March 2009.
88. Kang Tchou, 2009. "The future of the academic journal in China," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
89. Carol Tenopir and Donald W. King. 2009. "The growth of journals publishing," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
90. Peter A. Todd and Richard J. Ladle. 2008. "Hidden dangers of a 'citation culture'," Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, volume 8, pp. 13-16.
91. Elizabeth Wager and Tom Jefferson. 2001. "Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals," Learned Publishing, volume 14, pp. 257-263.
92. John Wilbanks, 2007. "Cyberinfrastructure For knowledge sharing," CTWatch Quarterly, volume 3, at http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/cyberinfrastructure-for-knowledge-sharing/, accessed 16 March 2009.
93. Sam Williams, 2002. Free as in freedom: Richard Stallman's crusade for free software. Sebastapol Calif.: O'Reilly.
94. John Willinsky, 2006a. The access principle: The case for open research and scholarship. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
95. John Willinsky, 2006b. "The properties of Locke's common-wealth of learning," Policy Futures in Education, volume 4, pp. 348-365.
96. John Willinsky, Sally Murray, Claire Kendall, and Anita Palepu. 2009. "Doing medical journals differently: Open medicine, open access, and academic freedom," In: B. Cope and A. Phillips (editors). The future of the academic journal. Oxford: Chandos.
97. Steven Wooding and Jonathan Grant. 2003. "Assessing research: The researchers' view," Joint Funding Bodies' Review of Research Assessment, U.K., at http://www.ra-review.ac.uk/reports/assess/AssessResearchReport.pdf, accessed 16 March 2009.