Deconstructing human literature reviews – A framework for multi-document summarization

ENLG 2013 - 14th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 125-135

  Jaidka, Kokil ^a   Khoo, Christopher S G ^a   Na, Jin Cheon ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; DOCUMENT STRUCTURE; INFORMATION SUMMARIZATION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MULTI-DOCUMENT SUMMARIZATION; PARTIAL IMPLEMENTATION; SCIENCE RESEARCH; SENTENCE LEVEL;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84937917550     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Barzilay, R., & McKeown, K. R. (2005). Sentence fusion for multidocument news summarization. Computational Linguistics, 31(3), 297-328.
2. Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
3. Bourner, T. (1996). The research process: four steps to success. Research methods: guidance for postgraduates, Arnold, London, 7-11.
4. Bruce, C. S. (1994). Research students' early experiences of the dissertation literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 217-229.
5. Bunton, D. (2002) Generic moves in Ph.D Introduction chapters. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse. London: Longman.
6. Cooper, H. M. (1988). The structure of knowledge synthesis. Knowledge in Society, 1, 104-126.
7. Hoang, C., & Kan, M.Y. 2010. Towards automated related work summarization. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’10): Posters (pp. 427–435).
8. DUC. (2002). The Document Understanding Conference. Retrieved Oct 2010, from http://duc.nist.gov.
9. Elhadad, N., Kan, M. Y., Klavans, J. L., & McKeown, K. R. (2005). Customization in a unified framework for summarizing medical literature.Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 33(2), 179.
10. Endres-Niggemeyer, B., Maier, E., & Sigel, A. (1995). How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting: four core working steps of an expert abstractor. Information Processing & Management, 31(5), 631-674.
11. Guo, Q., & Li, C. (2007, August). The Research on the Application of Text Clustering and Natural Language Understanding in Automatic Abstracting. In Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2007. FSKD 2007. Fourth International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 92-96). IEEE.
12. Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London: Sage.
13. Hinchliffe, L. (2003). Having your say in a scholarly way. Research Strategies, 19, 163– 164.
14. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151.
15. Jing, H., & McKeown, K. R. (1999). The decomposition of human-written summary sentences. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 129-136). ACM.
16. Jaidka, K., Khoo, C., and Na, J.-C. (2010). Imitating Human Literature Review Writing: An Approach to Multi-Document Summarization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries (ICADL) (pp. 116-119). Australia: Springer-Verlag.
17. Jaidka, K., Khoo, C., & Na, J. C. (2013). Literature Review Writing: How Information is Selected and Transformed. Aslib Proceedings, 65(3), 303-325.
18. Khoo, C., Na, J. C., & Jaidka, K. (2011). Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews. Online Information Review, 35(2), 255-271.
19. Kwan, B. S. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 30-55.
20. Lin, C. Y., & Hovy, E. (2003, May). Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology-Volume 1 (pp. 71-78). Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Marcu, D. (1997, July). From discourse structures to text summaries. In Proceedings of the ACL (Vol. 97, pp. 82-88).
22. Nenkova, A., & McKeown, K. (2011). Automatic summarization. Now Publishers Inc.
23. Nanba, H., Kando, N., & Okumura, M. (2011). Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types: Towards automatic review article generation. Advances in Classification Research Online, 11(1), 117-134.
24. Ou, S., Khoo, C. S. G., & Goh, D. H. (2008). Design and development of a concept-based multi-document summarization system for research abstracts. Journal of information science, 34(3), 308-326.
25. Radev, D. R., Jing, H., Styś, M., & Tam, D. (2004). Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents. Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 919-938.
26. Saggion, H., & Lapalme, G. (2002). Generating indicative-informative summaries with sumum. Computational linguistics, 28(4), 497-526.
27. Mohammad, S., Dorr, B., Egan, M., Ahmed, H., Muthukrishan, P., Qazvinian, V., Radev, D., Zajic, D. (2009). Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 584–592). Association for Computational Linguistics.
28. Sparck Jones, K., & Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (1995). Automatic summarizing. Information Processing & Management, 31(5), 625-630.
29. Sparck Jones, K. (2007). Automatic summarising: The state of the art. Information Processing & Management, 43(6), 1449-1481.
30. Teufel, S. (1999). Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text (Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh).
31. Teufel, S., & Moens, M. (2002). Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational linguistics, 28(4), 409-445.
32. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Batchelor, C. (2009, August). Towards discipline-independent argumentative zoning: Evidence from chemistry and computational linguistics. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 3 (pp. 1493-1502). Association for Computational Linguistics.
33. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367.
34. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.