Mind the nuisance: Gaussian process classification using privileged noise

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn 1, Issue January, 2014, Pages 837-845

  Hernández Lobato, Daniel ^a   Sharmanska, Viktoriia ^b   Kersting, Kristian ^c   Lampert, Christoph H ^b   Quadrianto, Novi ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

^c TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); INFORMATION SCIENCE; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NOISE POLLUTION;

ADDITIONAL KNOWLEDGE; GAUSSIAN PROCESS CLASSIFICATIONS; GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; INFORMATION SETTING; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MACHINE LEARNING COMMUNITIES; SVM-BASED METHODS; TRAINING PROCESS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84937846159     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. D.H. Wolpert. The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural computation, 8:1341-1390, 1996.
2. V. Vapnik and A. Vashist. A new learning paradigm: Learning using privileged information. Neural Networks, 22:544-557, 2009.
3. D. Pechyony and V. Vapnik. On the theory of learnining with privileged information. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 1894-1902, 2010.
4. B. Ribeiro, C. Silva, A. Vieira, A. Gaspar-Cunha, and J.C. das Neves. Financial distress model prediction using SVM+. In International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2010.
5. D. Pechyony and V. Vapnik. Fast optimization algorithms for solving SVM+. In Statistical Learning and Data Science, 2011.
6. V. Sharmanska, N. Quadrianto, and C. H. Lampert. Learning to rank using privileged information. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2013.
7. J. Feyereisl and U. Aickelin. Privileged information for data clustering. Information Sciences, 194:4-23, 2012.
8. S. Fouad, P. Tino, S. Raychaudhury, and P. Schneider. Incorporating privileged information through metric learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 24:1086-1098, 2013.
9. V. Sharmanska, N. Quadrianto, and C. H. Lampert. Learning to transfer privileged information, 2014. arXiv:1410.0389 [cs.CV].
10. M. Lapin, M. Hein, and B. Schiele. Learning using privileged information: SVM+ and weighted SVM. Neural Networks, 53:95-108, 2014.
11. P. W. Goldberg, C. K. I. Williams, and C. M. Bishop. Regression with input-dependent noise: A Gaussian process treatment. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 1998.
12. N. Quadrianto, K. Kersting, M. D. Reid, T. S. Caetano, and W. L. Buntine. Kernel conditional quantile estimation via reduction revisited. In International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 2009.
13. M. Lázaro-Gredilla and M. K. Titsias. Variational heteroscedastic Gaussian process regression. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2011.
14. C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning). The MIT Press, 2006.
15. B. Scholkopf and A. J. Smola. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001.
16. T. P. Minka. A Family of Algorithms for Approximate Bayesian Inference. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
17. H. Nickisch and C. E. Rasmussen. Approximations for Binary Gaussian Process Classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:2035-2078, 2008.
18. M. Kuss and C. E. Rasmussen. Assessing approximate inference for binary Gaussian process classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6:1679-1704, 2005.
19. M. Seeger. Expectation propagation for exponential families. Technical report, Department of EECS, University of California, Berkeley, 2006.
20. T. L. Berg, A. C. Berg, and J. Shih. Automatic attribute discovery and characterization from noisy web data. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2010.
21. H. Bay, A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 110:346-359, 2008.
22. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2013.
23. Q. V. Le and T. Mikolov. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2014.
24. C. H. Lampert, H. Nickisch, and S. Harmeling. Attribute-based classification for zero-shot visual object categorization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36:453-465, 2014.
25. J. Donahue, Y. Jia, O. Vinyals, J. Hoffman, N. Zhang, E. Tzeng, and T. Darrell. Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2014.
26. J. Demsər. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1-30, 2006.
27. J. Riihimäki, P. Jylänki, and A. Vehtari. Nested Expectation Propagation for Gaussian Process Classification with a Multinomial Probit Likelihood. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14:75-109, 2013.
28. D. Hernández-Lobato, J. M. Hernández-Lobato, and P. Dupont. Robust multi-class Gaussian process classification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2011.