Changes in participation after a mild stroke: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 59-68

  Rochette, Annie ^a,b   Desrosiers, Johanne ^c,d   Bravo, Gina ^c,d   St Cyr Tribble, Denise ^c,e   Bourget, Annick ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CENTRE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION OF GREATER MONTREAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Family relations; Leisure activities; Mild cerebrovascular accident; Participation; Qualitative research; Quantitative research; Rehabilitation; Roles

Indexed keywords

FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVALENCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIAL LIFE; STROKE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 34249936103     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1403-59     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Backe M, Larsson K, Fridlund B. Patients' conceptions of their life situation within the first week after a stroke event: a qualitative analysis. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1996;12:285-294.
2. Burton C. Living with a stroke: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:301-309.
3. Dijkerman HC, Wood VA, Hewer RL. Long-term outcome after discharge from a stroke rehabilitation unit. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996;30:538-546.
4. Neau JP, Ingrand P, Mouille Brachet C, et al. Functional recovery and social outcome after cerebral infarction in young adults. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998;8:296-302.
5. Sturm J, Dewey H, Donnan G, Macdonell R, McNeil J, Thrift A. Handicap after stroke: How does it relate to disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype?: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2002;33:762-768.
6. Mayo NE, Wood Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:258-268.
7. Jones MR, Horner RD, Edwards LJ, et al. Racial variation in initial stroke severity. Stroke. 2000;31:563-567.
8. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
9. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion SA, St-Michel G. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21:127-141.
10. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Noreau L, Bravo G, Rochette A, Bourget A. Participation after a stroke compared to normal aging. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37: 353-357.
11. Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:825-829.
12. Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. Determinants of handicap 1 and 3 years after a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19:205-211.
13. Clarke PJ, Black SE, Badley EM, Lawrence JM, Williams JI. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:116-123.
14. Carlsson GE, Moller A, Blomstrand C. Consequences of mild stroke in person <75 years - A one year follow-up. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(4):383-388.
15. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, Bravo G, Hebert R, Boutin C. Comparison of two functional independence scales with a participation measure in post-stroke rehabilitation. Arch Gerontol Qeriatr. 2003;37:157-172.
16. Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, et al. Health status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke. 1997; 28:740-745.
17. Duncan P, Richards L, Wallace D, et al. A randomized, controlled pilot study of a home-based exercise program for individuals with mild and moderate stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:2055-2060.
18. Carlsson GE, Moller A, Blomstrand C. A qualitative study of the consequences of "hidden dysfunctions" one year after a mild stroke in persons <75 years. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1373-1380.
19. Roding J, Lindstrom B, Malm J, Ohman A. Frustrated and invisible - younger stroke patients' experiences of the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:867-874.
20. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications; 1994.
21. Giorgi A. De la méthode phénoménologique utilisée comme mode de recherche qualitative en sciences humaines : théorie, pratique et évaluation. Dans: Poupart. La Recherche Qualitative: Enjeux Épistémologiques Et Mé thodologiques. Canada: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur; 1997.
22. Côté R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, Boucher J, Adam J, Hachinski V. The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. 1989;39:638-643.
23. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L. La Mesure de Habitudes de Vie - Instrument abrégé (MHAVIE 3.0). Lac St-Charles, (Québec), Canada: CQCIDIH; 1998.
24. Noreau L, Desrosiers J, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Ruchette A, Viscogliosi C. Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:346-352.
25. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogliosi C. Validity of the Assessment of Life Habits in older adults. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:177-182.
26. Thalheimer W, Cook S. How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: a simplified methodology. 2002. Available at: http://work-learning xom/effect_sizes.htm.
27. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159.
28. Fisk GD, Owsley C, Pulley LV. Driving after stroke: driving exposure, advice, and evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12):1338-1345.
29. Svenn U, Thommessen B, Bautz-Holter E, Wyller TB, Laake K. Well-being and instrumental activities of daily living after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:267-274.
30. Close H, Procter S. Coping strategies used by hospitalized stroke patients: implications for continuity and management of care. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:138-144.
31. Bakas T, Austin JK, Okonkwo KF, Lewis RR, Chadwick L. Needs, concerns, strategies, and advice of stroke caregivers the first 6 months after discharge. J Neurosci Nurs. 2002;34:242-251.
32. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bravo G, Boutin C. Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:774-785.
33. Levy R. Croyances et doute: une vision paradigmatique des méthodes qualitatives. Ruptures, Revue Transdisciplinaire En Santé. 1994;1:92-100.
34. Gendron S. L'alliance des approches qualitatives et quantitatives en promotion de la santé: vers une complémentarité transformatrice. Ruptures, Revue Transdisciplinaire En Santé. 1996;3:158-172.
35. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A. Social participation of older adults in Québec. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(5):406-412.