Assessing field spectroscopy metadata quality

Remote Sensing

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 4499-4526

  Rasaiah, Barbara A ^a   Jones, Simon D ^a   Bellman, Chris ^a   Malthus, Tim J ^b   Hueni, Andreas ^c  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Data quality; Databases; Field spectroscopy; Metadata

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; SEMANTICS;

DATA QUALITY; FIELD SPECTROSCOPY; LOGICAL CONSISTENCY; METADATA QUALITY; METADATA STANDARDS; QUALITY STANDARD; SPECTRAL LIBRARIES; SYNTACTIC ERRORS;

METADATA;

EID: 84937838480     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs70404499     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Rasaiah, B.A., Jones, S.D., Bellman, C., Malthus, T.J. Critical metadata for spectroscopy field campaign. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 3662-3680.
2. Rasaiah, B., Malthus, T., Jones, S.D., Bellman, C. Building better hyperspectral datasets: The fundamental role of metadata protocols in hyperspectral field campaigns. In Proceedings of the Surveying & Spatial Sciences Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 21-25 November 2011.
3. Rasaiah, B., Malthus, T., Jones, S.D., Bellman, C. Designing a robust hyperspectral dataset: The fundamental role of metadata protocols in hyperspectral field campaigns. In Proceedings of the GSR 1, Melbourne, Australia, 28-30 November 2011.
4. Rasaiah, B., Malthus, T., Jones, S.D., Bellman, C. Critical metadata protocols in hyperspectral field campaigns for building robust hyperspectral datasets. In Proceedings of the XXII ISPRS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 26 August-1 September 2012.
5. Rasaiah, B., Jones, S.D., Chisholm, L., Hueni, A., Bellman, C., Malthus, T.J., Chisholm, L., Gamon, J., Huete, A., Ong, C., et al. Approaches to establishing a metadata standard for field spectroscopy datasets. In Proceedings of IGARSS 2013, Melbourne, Australia, 21-26 July 2013.
6. Gamon, J.A., Rahman, A.F., Dungan, J.L., Schildhauer, M., Huemmrich, K.F. Spectral Network (SpecNet)-What is it and why do we need it? Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 103, 227-235.
7. Jung, A., Götze, C., Glässer, C. Overview of experimental setups in spectroscopic laboratory measurements-the SpecTour Project. Photogramm.-Fernerkund.-Geoinf. 2012, 4, 433-442.
8. Dor, E.B., Ong, C., Lau, I.C. Reflectance measurements of soils in the laboratory: Standards and protocols. Geoderma 2015, 245, 112-124.
9. FGDC. Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata: Extensions for Remote Sensing Metadata. Available online: http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/csdgm_rs_ex/MetadataRemoteSensingExtens.pdf (accessed on 24 August 2013).
10. ISO. Project Information--Fact Sheet 19113: 19113 Geographic Information-Quality Principle. Available online: http://www.isotc211.org/Outreach/Overview/Factsheet_19113.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2013).
11. ISO. ISO 19113:2002: Geographic Information--Quality Principles. Available online: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=26018 (accessed on 13 October 2013).
12. ISO. ISO/WD 19159 Geographic Information-Calibration and validation of remote sensing imagery sensors and data, 2011. Lysaker: ISO/TC 211 Secreteriat. Available online: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_tc_browse.htm?commid=54904 (accessed on 13 October 2013).
13. ANZLIC. ANZLIC Metadata Profile Version 1.1. Available online: http://spatial.gov.au/sites/default/files/legacy/osdm.gov.au/Metadata/ANZLIC%2BMetadata%2BProfile/default.html (accessed on 27 August 2013).
14. INSPIRE. INSPIRE Metadata Implementing Rules: Technical Guidelines Based on ENISO 19915 and ENISO 19119. Available online: http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Metadata/INSPIRE_MD_IR_and_ISO_v1_2_20100616.pdf (accessed on 17 May 2010).
15. Margaritopoulos, T., Margaritopoulos, M., Mavridis, I., Manitsaris, A. A conceptual framework for metadata quality assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, Germany, 22-26 September 2008.
16. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M.B., Shreeves, S.L., Cole, T.W. Metadata quality for federated collections. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, USA, 5-7 November 2004.
17. Park, J.R. Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art. Cat. Classif. Quart. 2009, 47, 213-228.
18. NISO. A Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections. Available online: http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/framework3.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2014).
19. Bruce, T.R., Hillmann, D.I. The continuum of metadata quality: Defining, expressing, exploiting. In Metadata in Practice; Hillmann, D., Westbrooks, E., Eds., American Libray Association Editions: Chicago, IL, USA, 2004; pp. 238-256;
20. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M.B., Smith, L.C. A framework for information quality assessment. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2007, 58, 1720-1733.
21. Ochoa, X., Duval, E. Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 2009, 10, 67-91.
22. Liolios, K., Schriml, L., Hirschman, L., Pagani, I., Nosrat, B., Sterk, P., Field, D. The Metadata Coverage Index (MCI): A standardized metric for quantifying database metadata richness. Stand. Genomic Sci. 2012, 6, 438-447.
23. Currier, S., Barton, J., O'Beirne, R., Ryan, B. Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: Issues for the metadata creation process. Res. Learn. Technol. 2004, 12, 5-20.
24. Goovaerts, M., Leinders, D. Metadata quality evaluation of a repository based on a sample technique. In Metadata and Semantics Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 181-189.
25. ANDS. Metadata. Available online: http://ands.org.au/guides/metadata-awareness.html (accessed on 7 January 2014).
26. USGS. USGS Digital Spectral Library splib06a. Available online: http://speclab.cr.usgs.gov/spectral.lib06/ds231/index.html (accessed on 26 October 2013).
27. Hueni, A., Nieke, J., Schopfer, J., Kneubuehler, J., Itten, K.I. The spectral database SPECCHIO for improved long-term usability and data sharing. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35, 557-565.
28. SAS Institute. Data Mining and the Case for Sampling. Available online: http://www.instinformatica. pt/servicos/informacao-e-documentacao/dossiers-tematicos/dossier-tematico-no-8-business-intelligence-abril-2010/estudos-de-caso/data-mining-and-the-case-for-sampling (accessed on 15 October 2013).
29. Khandar, P.V., Dani, S.V. Knowledge discovery and sampling techniques with data mining for identifying trends in data sets. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2011, 2011, 7-11.
30. Linting, M., Meulman. J.J., Groenen, P.J., van der Koojj, A.J. Nonlinear principal component analysis: Introduction and application. Psychol. Methods 2007, 12, 36-58.
31. Meulman, J.J.L., Heiser, W.J. IBM SPSS Categories 21. Available online: ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/21.0/en/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Categories.p df (accessed on 14 January 2014).
32. Starkweather, J. RSS SPSS Short Course Module 9 Categorical PCA. Available online: http://www.unt.edu/rss/class/Jon/SPSS_SC/Module9/M9_CATPCA/SPSS_M9_CATPCA.htm (accessed on 30 August 2013).
33. Kaiser, H.F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960, 20, 141-151.
34. Simon, S.P. Mean: Checks for Data Quality Using Metadata. Available online: http://www.pmean.com/08/CheckMetadata.html (accessed on 26 October 2013).
35. Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A. Elements of Information Theory; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1991; pp. 112-113.
36. Hueni, A. SPECCHIO User Guide V. 2.1.2. Available online: http://specchio.ch/user_guides.php (accessed on 23 March 2012).
37. Goodchild, M.F. Beyond metadata: Towards user-centric description of data quality. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality, Enschede, The Netherlands, 13-15 June 2007.