A conceptual framework for metadata quality assessment

Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 104-113

  Margaritopoulos, Thomas ^a   Margaritopoulos, Merkourios ^a   Mavridis, Ioannis ^a   Manitsaris, Athanasios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Digital repositories; Logic rules; Metadata quality; Related resources

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; DIGITAL REPOSITORY; DIGITAL RESOURCES; FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT; LOGIC RULES; METADATA QUALITY; RELATED RESOURCES; SEMANTIC RELATIONS;

SEMANTICS;

METADATA;

EID: 62149123121     PISSN: 19391358     EISSN: 19391366     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Barton, Jane, Sarah Currier, and Jessie M. N. Hey. (2003). Building quality assurance into metadata creation: An analysis based on the learning objects and e-prints communities of practice. Proceedings of Dublin Core Conference 2003: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice - Metadata Research and Applications, 2003, (pp. 39-48).
2. Bourda, Yolaine, Bichlien Doan, and Walid Kekhia. (2002). A semi-automatic tool for the indexation of learning objects. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2002, (pp. 190-191).
3. Brase, Jan, Mark Painter, and Wolfgang Nejdl. (2003). Completion Axioms for learning object metadata - Towards a formal description of LOM. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2003).
4. Bruce, Thomas R., and Diane I. Hillmann. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: Defining, expressing, exploiting. In Dianne. I. Hillmann and Elaine L. Westbrooks (Eds.), Metadata in practice, (pp. 238-256). Chicago: ALA.
5. Bui, Yen, and Jung-ran Park (2006). An assessment of metadata quality: A case study of the national science digital library metadata repository. In Haidar Moukdad (ed.), CAIS/ACSI 2006 Information Science Revisited: Approaches to Innovation from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2006/bui-2006.pdf.
6. Currier, Sarah, Jane Barton, Rónán O'Beirne, and Ben Ryan. (2004). Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: Issues for the metadata creation process. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 12(1), 5-20.
7. DCMI Usage Board. (2008). DCMI Metadata Terms. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/.
8. Doan, Bich-lien, and Yolaine Bourda. (2005). Defining several ontologies to enhance the expressive power of queries. Proceedings on Interoperability of web-based Educational Systems, WWW'05 conference, Chiba, Japan.
9. Dushay, Naomi., and Diane I. Hillmann. (2003). Analyzing metadata for effective use and re-use. DCMI Metadata Conference and Workshop, Seattle, USA.
10. Duval, Erik, and Wayne Hodgins. (2004). Metadata matters. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 2004, (pp. 11-14).
11. Friesen, Norm. (2004). International LOM Survey: Report (Draft). Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/403/01/ LOM%5FSurvey%5FReport2.doc.
12. Gasser, Les, and Besiki Stvilia. (2001). A new framework for information quality. Technical report, ISRN UIUCLIS- 2001/1+AMAS, 2001.
13. Greenberg, Jane, Maria Cristina Pattuelli, Bijan Parsia, and W. Davenport Robertson. (2001). Author-generated Dublin Core metadata for web resources: A baseline study in an organization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 2001, (pp. 38-46). National Institute of Informatics.
14. Guy, Marieke, Andy Powell, and Michael Day. (2004). Improving the quality of metadata in Eprint archives. Ariadne 38.
15. Hatala, Marek, and Griff Richards. (2003). Value-added metatagging: Ontology and rule based methods for smarter metadata. In Michael Schroeder and Gerd Wagner (Eds.), RuleML 2003, (pp. 65-80).
16. Hillmann, Diane. I., and Jon Phipps. (2007). Application profiles: Exposing and enforcing metadata quality. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 2007, (pp. 52-62).
17. Hughes, Baden. (2004). Metadata quality evaluation: Experience from the open language archives community. Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization, (320-329).
18. IEEE. 1484.12.1 (2002). Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Learning Technology Standards Committee of the IEEE. Retrieved 18 March, 2008, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM-1484-12-1-v1-Final-Draft.pdf.
19. Margaritopoulos, Merkourios, Athanasios Manitsaris, and Ioannis Mavridis. (2007). On the Identification of Inference Rules for Automatic Metadata Generation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (CD-ROM), 2007. Ionian Academy.
20. Moen, William E., Erin L. Stewart, and Charles L. McClure. (1997). Assessing metadata quality: Findings and methodological considerations from an evaluation of the US Government information locator service (GILS). Proceedings of the Advances in Digital Libraries Conference, 1998, (p. 246). IEEE Computer Society
21. Motelet, Olivier. (2005). Relation-based heuristic diffusion framework for LOM generation. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education AIED 200. Amsterdam, Holland: Young Researcher Track.
22. Najjar, Jehad, Stefaan Ternier, and Erik Duval. (2004). User behavior in learning object repositories: An empirical analysis. Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2004 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, AACE, 2004, (pp. 4373-4379).
23. Ochoa, Xavier, and Erik Duval. (2006). Quality Metrics for Learning Object Metadata. In Elain Pearson and Paul Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2006, (pp. 1004-1011). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
24. Sicilia, Miguel-Angel, Elena García-Barriocanal, Carmen Pagés, José-Javier Martínez, and José-María Gutiérrez. (2005). Complete metadata records in learning object repositories: Some evidence and requirements. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1(4), 411-424.
25. Wason, Thomas D., and David Wiley. (2001). Structured Metadata Spaces. In Jane Greenberg (ed.), Metadata and Organizing Educational Resources on the Internet, (pp. 263-277). New York: Haworth Press.