Erratum to: Proof over promise: Towards a more inclusive ranking of dutch academics in economics & business(Scientometrics, DOI:10.1007/s11192-014-1370-z);Proof over promise: Towards a more inclusive ranking of dutch academics in economics & business

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 727-749

  Harzing, Anne Wil ^a   Mijnhardt, Wilfred ^b  

^a ESCP EUROPE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Citations; Economics; Google scholar; ISI; Rankings

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937796745     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1511-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (26)

1. Abbring, J. H., Bronnenberg, B. J., Gautier, P. A., & van Ours, J. C. (2014). Dutch Economists top 40. De Economist, 162, 107–114.
2. Adler, N., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. The Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72–95.
3. Börner, K., Dall’Asta, L., Ke, W., & Vespignani, A. (2005). Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity, 10(4), 57–67.
4. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h-index and 37 different h-index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 346–359.
5. Franses, P. H. (2014). Trends in three decades of rankings of Dutch Economists. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1257–1268.
6. Garcίa, J. A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2012). A comparison of top economics departments in the US and EU on the basis of the multidimensional prestige of influential articles in 2010. Scientometrics, 93(3), 681–698.
7. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 61(3), 395–404.
8. Harzing, A. W. (2005). Australian research output in Economics & Business: High volume, low impact? Australian Journal of Management, 30(2), 183–200.
9. Harzing, A. W. (2007) Publish or Perish, Retrieved February 3, 2014, from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm
10. Harzing, A. W. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of Nobel Prize winners. Scientometrics, 93(3), 1057–1075.
11. Harzing, A. W., Alakangas, S., & Adams, D. (2014). hIa: An individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences. Scientometrics, 99(3), 811–821.
12. Harzing, A. W., & van der Wal, R. (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in Economics & Business? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41–46.
13. Jacso, P. (2010). Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar. Online Information Review, 34(1), 175–191.
14. Jin, J. C., & Choi, E. K. (2014). Citations of Most Often Cited Economists: Do Scholarly Books Matter More than Quality Journals? Pacific Economic Review, 19(1), 8–24.
15. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited—Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 491–506.
16. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366.
17. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research policy, 26(1), 1–18.
18. Kodrzycki, Y. K., & Yu, P. (2006). New approaches to ranking economics journals. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1), 1–40.
19. London School of Economics and Political Science. (2011). Impact of the social sciences: Maximizing the impact of academic research. Retrieved February 3, 2014, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/.
20. Nederhof, A. J. (2008). Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics. Scientometrics, 74(1), 163–174.
21. Prathap, G. (2010). The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics, 84(1), 167–172.
22. Scott, L. C., & Mitias, P. M. (1996). Trends in rankings of economics departments in the US: An update. Economic inquiry, 34(2), 378–400.
23. Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638.
24. Singh, G., Haddad, K. M., & Chow, C. W. (2007). Are articles in ‘‘top’’ management journals necessarily of higher quality? Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(4), 319–331.
25. Starbuck, W. H. (2005). How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16(2), 180–200.
26. Tol, R. S. (2009). The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics, 80(2), 317–324