hIa: An individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences

Scientometrics

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 811-821

  Harzing, Anne Wil ^a,b   Alakangas, Satu ^c   Adams, David ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b ESCP EUROPE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d Tarma Software Research Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

Citations; h Index; Research impact; Scopus

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900493254     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1208-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adler, N., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. The Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72-95.
2. Antonakis, J., & Lalive, R. (2008). Quantifying scholarly impact: IQp versus the Hirsch h. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 956-969.
3. Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., & Kinouchi, O. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.
4. Börner, K., Dall'Asta, L., Ke, W., & Vespignani, A. (2005). Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity, 10(4), 57-67.
5. Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2011). The h index as a research performance indicator. European Science Editing, 37(3), 77-80.
6. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h-index and 37 different h-index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 346-359.
7. Bourke, P. (1997). Discipline boundaries in the social sciences. Occasional Paper Series 1. Canberra: Academy of the Social Sciences.
8. Burrell, Q. L. (2007). Hirsch index or Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang's data. Scientometrics, 73(1), 19-28.
9. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
10. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 61(3), 395-404.
11. Hagen, N. T. (2009). Credit for coauthors. Science, 323(5914), 583.
12. Hare, J. (2012, December 6). How universities performed in ERA 2012. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www. theaustralian. com. au/higher-education/how-universities-performed-in-era-2012/story-e6frgcjx-1226530828592.
13. Harzing, A. W. (2007) Publish or Perish. Retrieved from http://www. harzing. com/pop. htm.
14. Harzing, A. W. (2010). The Publish or Perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. Melbourne: Tarma Software Research.
15. Hellqvist, B. (2010). Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 310-318.
16. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
17. Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741-754.
18. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
19. Kaur, J., Hoang, D. T., Sun, X., Possamai, L., JafariAsbagh, M., Patil, S., et al. (2012). Scholarometer: A social framework for analyzing impact across disciplines. PLoS One, 7(9), e43235.
20. Kaur, J., Radicchi, F., & Menczer, F. (2013). Universality of scholarly impact metrics. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 924-932.
21. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.
22. Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 131-142.
23. Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100.
24. m-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 211-216.
25. Tol, R. S. (2011). Credit where credit's due: accounting for co-authorship in citation counts. Scientometrics, 89(1), 291-299.
26. Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9(1), 66-100.