Quantitative mapping of patented technology - The case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 466-478

  Lee, Pei Chun ^a,b   Su, Hsin Ning ^b   Wu, Feng Shang ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL APPLIED RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Mapping; Network analysis; Patent citation; Quantitative analysis; Technology evolution

Indexed keywords

BETWEENNESS CENTRALITY; CONDUCTING POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES; DEGREE CENTRALITY; DISTANCE-BASED; GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NETWORK PROPERTIES; PATENT CITATION; PATENT DATABASE; PATENTED TECHNOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE MAPPING; RELATIVE DISTANCES; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY EVOLUTION;

COMPUTER CRIME; CONDUCTING POLYMERS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTANCE; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; MAPPING; NANOCOMPOSITES; ORGANIC CONDUCTORS; TECHNICAL WRITING; TECHNOLOGY;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

DATABASE; MAPPING METHOD; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHOD; POLYMER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 76049101356     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Kuhn T.S., Dewey J., and Neurath O. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
2. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11 (1982) 147-162
3. Kostoff R.N., Eberhart H.J., and Toothman D.R. Database tomography for technical intelligence: a roadmap of the near-earth space science and technology literature. Inf. Process. Manag. 34 (1998) 69-85
4. Kostoff R.N., Tshiteya R., Pfeil K.M., and Humenik J.A. Electrochemical power text mining using bibliometrics and database tomography. J. Power Sources 110 (2002) 163-176
5. Kostoff R.N., Tshiteya R., Pfeil K.M., Humenik J.A., and Karypis G. Power source roadmaps using bibliometrics and database tomography. Energy 30 (2005) 709-730
6. Kostoff R.N., del R'i{dotless}o J.A., Cortés H.D., Smith C., Smith A., Wagner C., Leydesdorff L., Karypis G., Malpohl G., and Tshiteya R. The structure and infrastructure of Mexico's science and technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72 (2005) 798-814
7. Kostoff R.N. Literature-related discovery (LRD): introduction and background. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 2 (2008) 165-185
8. Kostoff R.N. Literature-related discovery (LRD): potential treatments for cataracts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 2 (2008) 215-225
9. Kostoff R.N., Bhattacharya S., and Pecht M. Assessment of China's and India's science and technology literature-introduction, background, and approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 9 (2007) 1519-1538
10. Kostoff R.N., Johnson D., Bowles C.A., Bhattacharya S., Icenhour A.S., Nikodym K., Barth R.B., and Dodbele S. Assessment of India's Research Literature, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 (2007) 1574-1608
11. Kostoff R.N., Briggs M.B., Rushenberg R.L., Bowles C.A., Icenhour A.S., Nikodym K.F., Barth R.B., and Pecht M. Chinese science and technology-structure and infrastructure. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 (2007) 1539-1573
12. Kostoff R.N., Briggs M.B., Rushenberg R.L., Bowles C.A., Pecht M., Johnson D., Bhattacharya S., Icenhour A.S., Nikodym K., and Barth R.B. Comparisons of the structure and infrastructure of Chinese and Indian Science and Technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 (2007) 1609-1630
13. Kostoff R.N., Koytcheff R.G., and Lau C.G. Global nanotechnology research literature overview. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74 (2007) 1733-1747
14. Kostoff R.N., Block J.A., Solka J.L., Briggs M.B., Rushenberg R.L., Stump J.A., Johnson D., Lyons T.J., and Wyatt J.R. Literature-related discovery (LRD): lessons learned, and future research directions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 2 (2008) 276-299
15. Kostoff R.N., Briggs M.B., Solka J.L., and Rushenberg R.L. Literature-related discovery (LRD): methodology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 2 (2008) 186-202
16. Kostoff R.N., Briggs M.B., and Lyons T.J. Literature-related discovery (LRD): potential treatments for Multiple Sclerosis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 2 (2008) 239-255
17. Kostoff R.N., Solka J.L., Rushenberg R.L., and Wyatt J.A. Literature-related discovery (LRD): water purification. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 2 (2008) 256-275
18. Kostoff R.N., and Briggs M.B. Literature-related discovery (LRD): potential treatments for Parkinson's disease. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 5 2 (2008) 226-238
19. Kostoff R.N. Comparison of China/USA science and technology performance. Journal of Informetrics 2 (2008) 354-363
20. King J. A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J. Inf. Sci. 13 (1987) 261
21. Law J., and Whittaker J. Mapping acidification research: a test of the co-word method. Scientometrics 23 (1992) 417-461
22. Gupta B.M., and Bhattacharya S. A bibliometric approach towards mapping the dynamics of science and technology. DESIDOC Bul. Inf. Technol. 24 (2004) 3-8
23. Ding Y., Chowdhury G.G., and Foo S. Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Inf. Process. Manag. 37 (2001) 817-842
24. Baldwin C., Hughes J., Hope T., Jacoby R., and Ziebland S. Ethics and dementia: mapping the literature by bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 18 1 (2003) 41-54
25. Tian Y., Wen C., and Hong S. Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. Journal of Informetrics 2 (2008) 65-74
26. Coulter N., Monarch I., and Konda S. Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49 (1998)
27. Callon M., Courtial J.P., and Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22 (1991) 155-205
28. Courtial J.P. A coword analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics 31 (1994) 251-260
29. Noyons E.C.M., and Van Raan A.F.J. Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: self-organized structuring to map neural network research. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49 1 (1998) 68-81
30. Van Raan A.F.J., and Tijssen R.J.W. The neural net of neural network research: an exercise in bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 26 (1993) 169-192
31. Cambrosio A., Limoges C., Courtial J.P., and Laville F. Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with coword analysis. Scientometrics 27 (1993) 119-143
32. Noyons E.C.M., and van Raan A.F.J. Bibliometric cartography of scientific and technological developments of an R & D field. Scientometrics 30 (1994) 157-173
33. Hinze S. Bibliographical cartography of an emerging interdisciplinary discipline: the case of bioelectronics. Scientometrics 29 (1994) 353-376
34. Rikken F., Kiers H.A.L., and Vos R. Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL. Scientometrics 3 (1995) 367-380
35. Clarke A., Gatineau M., Thorogood M., and Wyn-Roberts N. Health promotion research literature in Europe 1995-2005. Eur. J. Public Health 17 (2007) 24
36. Rip A., and Courtial J.P. Co-word maps of biotechnology: an example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics 6 (1984) 381-400
37. De Looze M.A., and Lemarié J. Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: an application to plant proteins. Scientometrics 39 (1997) 267-280
38. Ho Y.S. Bibliometric analysis of adsorption technology in environmental science. J. Environ. Prot. Sci. 1 (2007) 1-11
39. Bhattacharya S., and Basu P.K. Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scientometrics 43 (1998) 359-372
40. Chiu W.T., Huang J.S., and Ho Y.S. Bibliometric analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related research in the beginning stage. Scientometrics 61 (2004) 69-77
41. Chiu W.T., and Ho Y.S. Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics 73 (2007) 3-17
42. Li T., Ho Y.S., and Li C.Y. Bibliometric analysis on global Parkinson's disease research trends during 1991-2006. Neurosci. Lett. 441 (2008) 248-252
43. Kajikawa Y., Yoshikawa J., Takeda Y., and Matsushima K. Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: toward a roadmap for sustainable energy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 (2008) 771-782
44. Kajikawa Y., and Takeda Y. Structure of research on biomass and bio-fuels: a citation-based approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 (2008) 1349-1359
45. Kajikawa Y., and Takeda Y. Citation Network Analysis of Organic LEDs. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76 (2009) 1115-1123
46. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., and Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q. J. Econ. (1993) 577-598
47. Chang S.B., Lai K.K., and Chang S.M. Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: using the patent citation network. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76 (2009) 107-117
48. Acosta M., and Coronado D. Science-technology flows in Spanish regions-an analysis of scientific citations in patents. Res. Policy 32 (2003) 1783-1803
49. Hall B.H., Jaffe A., and Trajtenberg M. Market value and patent citations. Rand J. Econ. (2005) 16-38
50. Stuart T.E., and Podolny J.M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strateg. Manage. J. 17 (1996) 21-38
51. Otte E., and Rousseau R. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. J. Inf. Sci. 28 (2002) 441
52. Liebowitz J. Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations. J. Knowl. Manag. 9 (2005) 76-86
53. Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social networks 1 (1979) 215-239
54. Brass D.J., and Burkhardt M.E. Centrality and power in organizations. Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action 191 (1992) 215
55. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78 (1973) 1360
56. Concordance Between the U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) System and the Standard Industrial Code (SIC) System, Patent Technology Monitoring Division (PTMD) Research Publications, Jun. 2008.
57. Zhu D., and Porter A.L. Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 69 (2002) 495-506
58. Porter A.L. QTIP: quick technology intelligence processes. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72 (2005) 1070-1081
59. Daim T.U., Rueda G., Martin H., and Gerdsri P. Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73 (2006) 981-1012