Combined MEG and EEG show reliable patterns of electromagnetic brain activity during natural viewing

NeuroImage

Volumn 114, Issue , 2015, Pages 49-56

  Chang, Wei Tang ^a   Jääskeläinen, Iiro P ^b   Belliveau, John W ^a,c   Huang, Samantha ^a   Hung, An Yi ^a,d   Rossi, Stephanie ^a   Ahveninen, Jyrki ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^c HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFACT; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MOVIE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFACTS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MOTION PICTURES AS TOPIC; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937765056     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.066     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bartels A., Zeki S. Functional brain mapping during free viewing of natural scenes. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 21:75-85.
2. Betti V., Della Penna S., de Pasquale F., Mantini D., Marzetti L., Romani G.L., Corbetta M. Natural scenes viewing alters the dynamics of functional connectivity in the human brain. Neuron 2013, 79:782-797.
3. Blackman R.B., Tukey J.W. The measurement of power spectra, from the point of view of communications engineering 1959, Dover Publications, New York.
4. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
5. Dale A., Sereno M. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1993, 5:162-176.
6. Dale A.M., Fischl B., Sereno M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I: Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 1999, 9:179-194.
7. Desikan R., Segonne F., Fischl B., Quinn B., Dickerson B., Blacker D., Buckner R., Dale A., Maguire R., Hyman B., Albert M., Killiany R. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 2006, 31:968-980.
8. Dmochowski J.P., Sajda P., Dias J., Parra L.C. Correlated components of ongoing EEG point to emotionally laden attention-a possible marker of engagement?. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:112.
9. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., Dale A.M. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 1999, 9:195-207.
10. Fisher R.A. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika Trust 1915, 10:507-521.
11. Glover G.H., Li T.Q., Ress D. Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 44:162-167.
12. Gross J., Hoogenboom N., Thut G., Schyns P., Panzeri S., Belin P., Garrod S. Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001752.
13. Hahn B., Ross T.J., Stein E.A. Cingulate activation increases dynamically with response speed under stimulus unpredictability. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:1664-1671.
14. Hämäläinen M., Ilmoniemi R. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions 1984, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland.
15. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65:413-497.
16. Hasson U., Nir Y., Levy I., Fuhrmann G., Malach R. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 2004, 303:1634-1640.
17. Hasson U., Malach R., Heeger D.J. Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:40-48.
18. Jääskeläinen I.P., Koskentalo K., Balk M.H., Autti T., Kauramaki J., Pomren C., Sams M. Inter-subject synchronization of prefrontal cortex hemodynamic activity during natural viewing. Open Neuroimaging J. 2008, 2:14-19.
19. Lahnakoski J.M., Glerean E., Salmi J., Jaaskelainen I.P., Sams M., Hari R., Nummenmaa L. Naturalistic FMRI mapping reveals superior temporal sulcus as the hub for the distributed brain network for social perception. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:233.
20. Lahnakoski J.M., Glerean E., Jaaskelainen I.P., Hyona J., Hari R., Sams M., Nummenmaa L. Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives. NeuroImage 2014, 100:316-324.
21. Lankinen K., Saari J., Hari R., Koskinen M. Intersubject consistency of cortical MEG signals during movie viewing. NeuroImage 2014, 92C:217-224.
22. Luo H., Liu Z., Poeppel D. Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000445.
23. Molins A., Stufflebeam S.M., Brown E.N., Hamalainen M.S. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation. NeuroImage 2008, 42:1069-1077.
24. Nummenmaa L., Glerean E., Viinikainen M., Jaaskelainen I.P., Hari R., Sams M. Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:9599-9604.
25. Percival D.B., Walden A.T. Spectral analysis for physical applications: multitaper and conventional univariate techniques 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, NY, USA.
26. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:169-192.
27. Särkkä S., Solin A., Nummenmaa A., Vehtari A., Auranen T., Vanni S., Lin F.H. Dynamic retrospective filtering of physiological noise in BOLD fMRI: DRIFTER. NeuroImage 2012, 60:1517-1527.
28. Sharon D., Hamalainen M.S., Tootell R.B., Halgren E., Belliveau J.W. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex. NeuroImage 2007, 36:1225-1235.
29. Spiers H.J., Maguire E.A. Decoding human brain activity during real-world experiences. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:356-365.
30. Taulu S., Simola J. Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006, 51:1759-1768.
31. Theiler J., Prichard D. Constrained-realization Monte-Carlo method for hypothesis testing. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 1996, 94:221-235.
32. Westermann R., Spies K., Stahl G., Hesse F.W. Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 26:557-580.
33. Whittingstall K., Bartels A., Singh V., Kwon S., Logothetis N.K. Integration of EEG source imaging and fMRI during continuous viewing of natural movies. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 28:1135-1142.