Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives

NeuroImage

Volumn 100, Issue , 2014, Pages 316-324

  Lahnakoski, Juha M ^a   Glerean, Enrico ^a   Jääskeläinen, Iiro P ^a   Hyönä, Jukka ^b   Hari, Riitta ^a   Sams, Mikko ^a   Nummenmaa, Lauri ^a,c  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c TURKU PET CENTRE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Attention; FMRI; Inter subject correlation; Psychological perspective

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATERAL OCCIPITAL CORTEX; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; THEORY OF MIND; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; THEORY OF MIND; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904087405     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allison T., Puce A., McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:267-278.
2. Anderson R.C., Pichert J.W. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 1978, 17:1-12.
3. Andrews T.J., Schluppeck D., Homfray D., Matthews P., Blakemore C. Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion. NeuroImage 2002, 17:890-901.
4. Bar M. The proactive brain: memory for predictions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2009, 364:1235-1243.
5. Boldt R., Malinen S., Seppä M., Tikka P., Savolainen P.I., Hari R., Carlson S. Listening to an audio drama activates two processing networks, one for all sounds, another exclusively for speech. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e64489. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064489.
6. Chawla D., Rees G., Friston K.J. The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:671-676.
7. Cooper E.A., Hasson U., Small S.L. Interpretation-mediated changes in neural activity during language comprehension. NeuroImage 2011, 55:1314-1323.
8. Corbetta M., Schulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
9. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20:273-297.
10. Çukur T., Nishimoto S., Huth A.G., Gallant J.L. Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:763-770.
11. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1995, 18:193-222.
12. Esterman M., Chiu Y.-C., Tamber-Rosenau B.J., Yantis S. Decoding cognitive control in human parietal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:17974-17979.
13. Fix E., Hodges J.L. Discriminatory analysis-nonparametric discrimination: consistency properties. Report Number 4, Project Number 21-49-004 1951, (Reprinted as International Statistical Review 57: 238-247), USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph Field, Texas.
14. Hasson U., Hendler T., Ben Bashat D., Malach R. Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2001, 13:744-753.
15. Hasson U., Nir Y., Levy I., Fuhrmann G., Malach R. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 2004, 303:1634-1640.
16. Hastorf A.H., Cantril H. They saw a game: a case study. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1954, 49:129-134.
17. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293:2425-2430.
18. Jääskeläinen I.P., Koskentalo K., Balk M.H., Autti T., Kauramäki J., Pomren C., Sams M. Inter-subject synchronization of prefrontal cortex hemodynamic activity during natural viewing. Open Neuroimaging J. 2008, 2:14-19.
19. Jääskeläinen I.P., Ahveninen J., Andermann M.L., Belliveau J.W., Raij T., Sams M. Short term plasticity as a neural mechanism supporting memory and attentional functions. Brain Res. 2011, 1422:66-81.
20. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J. Perspective-driven text comprehension. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2008, 22:319-334.
21. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J., Keenan J.M. Perspective effects on online text processing. Discl. Process. 2002, 33:159-173.
22. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J., Keenan J.M. How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2003, 29:447-457.
23. Kaakinen J.K., Hyönä J., Viljanen M. Influence of a psychological perspective on scene viewing and memory for scenes. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 64:1372-1387.
24. Kauppi Jukka-Pekka, Jääskeläinen Iiro P., Sams Mikko, Tohka Jussi Inter-subject correlation of brain hemodynamic responses during watching a movie: localization in space and frequency. Front Neuroinf. 2010, 4. 10.3389/finf.2010.00005.
25. Kauppi J.-P., Pajula J., Tohka J. A versatile software package for inter-subject correlation based analyses of fMRI. Front Neuroinf. 2014, 8:2014. 10.3389/fninf.2014.00002.
26. Lahnakoski J.M., Glerean E., Salmi J., Jääskeläinen I.P., Sams M., Hari R., Nummenmaa L. Naturalistic fMRI mapping reveals superior temporal sulcus as the hub for the distributed brain network for social perception. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:233.
27. Lahnakoski J.M., Salmi J., Jääskeläinen I.P., Lampinen J., Glerean E., Tikka P., Sams M. Stimulus-related independent component and voxel-wise analysis of human brain activity during free viewing of a feature film. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e35215.
28. Malinen S., Hlushchuk Y., Hari R. Towards natural stimulation in MRI - issues of data analysis. NeuroImage 2007, 35:131-139.
29. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967, 27:209-220.
30. Mitchell T.M., Hutcinson R., Niculescu R.S., Pereira F., Wang X., Just M., Newman S. Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Mach. Learn. 2004, 57:145-175.
31. Moll H., Meltzoff A.N. Perspective taking and its foundation in joint attention. Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology 2011, 286-304. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. N. Eilan, H. Lerman, J. Roessler (Eds.).
32. Nishimoto S., Huth A., Bilenko N., Gallant J. Human visual areas invariant to eye movements during natural vision. J. Vis. 2013, 13:1061. (article).
33. Nummenmaa L., Calder A.J. Neural mechanisms of social attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:135-143.
34. Nummenmaa L., Glerean E., Viinikainen M., Jääskeläinen I.P., Hari R., Sams M. Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:9599-9604.
35. Nummenmaa L., Smirnov D., Lahnakoski J., Glerean E., Jääskeläinen I.P., Sams M., Hari R. Mental action simulation synchronizes action-observation circuits across individuals. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:748-757.
36. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects. Nature 1999, 401:584-587.
37. Pajula J., Kauppi J.-P., Tohka J. Inter-subject correlation in fMRI: method validation against stimulus-model based analysis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e41196. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041196.
38. Pannasch S., Velichkovsky B.M. Distractor effect and saccade amplitudes: further evidence on different modes of processing in free exploration of visual images. Vis. Cogn. 2009, 17:1109-1131.
39. Raghunathan T.E., Rosenthal R., Rubin D. Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations. Psychol. Methods 1996, 1:178-183.
40. Rose M., Schmid C., Winzen A., Sommer T., Büchel C. The functional and temporal characteristics of top-down modulation in visual selection. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1290-1298.
41. Salmi J., Glerean E., Jääskeläinen I.P., Lahnakoski J.M., Kettunen J., Lampinen J., Tikka P., Sams M. Posterior parietal cortex activity reflects the significance of others' actions during natural viewing. Hum. Brain Mapp 2014, 10.1002/hbm.22510.
42. Schippers M.B., Roebroeck A., Renken R., Nanetti L., Keysers C. Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:9388-9393.
43. Schmälzle R., Häcker F., Renner B., Honey C.J., Schupp H.T. Neural correlates of risk perception during real-life risk communication. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:10340-10347.
44. Stephens G.J., Silbert L.J., Hasson U. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:14425-14430.
45. Vuontela V., Jiang P., Tokariev M., Savolainen P., Ma Y., Aronen E.T., Fontell T., Liiri T., Ahlström M., Salonen O., Carlson S. Regulation of brain activity in the fusiform face and parahippocampal place areas in 7-11-year-old children. Brain Cogn. 2013, 81:203-214.
46. Wager T.D., Jonides J., Reading S. Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis. NeuroImage 2004, 22:1679-1693.
47. Wilson S.M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Iacoboni M. Beyond superior temporal cortex: intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:230-242.