Emotional engagement in agentive science learning environments

Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

Volumn 2, Issue January, 2014, Pages 1152-1156

  Morozov, Andrew ^a   Herrenkohl, Leslie Rupert ^a   Shutt, Kari ^a   Thummaphan, Phonraphee ^a   Vye, Nancy ^a   Abbott, Robert ^a   Scalone, Giovanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION;

AFFECTIVE STATE; ELEMENTARY SCIENCE; EMOTIONAL ENGAGEMENTS; EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCES; EMOTIONAL RESPONSE; INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITIES; SCIENCE LEARNING; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84937723118     PISSN: 18149316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2009). Teaching how science really works. Education Canada, (49)3, 14-17.
2. Brown, A. (1978). Knowing when, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Dreyfus, H. L. (1984). What expert systems can't do. Raritan, 3(4), 22-36.
4. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
5. Engle, R. A., McKinney de Royston, M., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2008). Toward a model of differential influence in discussions: Negotiating-XE "negotiating" } quality, authority, and access within a heated classroom argument. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science Society, Washington, DC.
6. Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2007). Power in numbers: An analysis of how shifts in social-XE "social" } and mathematical power-XE "power" } among students in a cooperative group affect opportunities for learning-XE "learning" } . Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
7. Greeno-XE "Greeno" }, J. G. (2002). Students with competence, authority, and accountability: Affording intellective identities in classrooms. New York: The College Board.
8. Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 327-369.
9. Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavios. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411-482.
10. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade. Cognition and Instruction. 16 (4), 431-73.
11. Herrenkohl, L.R. and Mertl, V. (2011). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. Cambridge UK, New York City: Cambridge University Press.
12. Herrenkohl, L.R., Palincsar, A.S., DeWater, L.S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 451-493.
13. Holland-XE "Holland" }, D., Lachicotte-XE "Lachicotte" }, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency-XE "agency" } in cultural-XE "cultural" } worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Metz, K. (2000). Young chldren's inquiry in biology. In J. Minstrell & E. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. (pp. 371-404). Washington, DC: AAAS.
15. Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural-XE "sociocultural" } perspectives on race, culture, and learning-XE "learning" }. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449-479.
16. Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., and Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural-XE "cultural" } process. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp.489-504). NY: Cambridge University Press.
17. National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: NAP
18. National Research Council (2009). Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: NAP
19. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (October 2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331-337.
20. Scalone, G. (2014). Cultivating Agency in Science Argumentation and Sense-making in Elementary Science Classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
21. Spiro, M. (1982). Collective representations and mental representations in religious symbol systems. In J. Maquet (Ed.), On symbols in anthropology: Essays in honor of Harry Hoijer (pp. 45-72). Malibu: Udena.
22. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling and metcognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.