ViSAPy: A Python tool for biophysics-based generation of virtual spiking activity for evaluation of spike-sorting algorithms

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 245, Issue , 2015, Pages 182-204

  Hagen, Espen ^a,b   Ness, Torbjørn V ^a   Khosrowshahi, Amir ^a,c,d   Sørensen, Christina ^e   Fyhn, Marianne ^e   Hafting, Torkel ^e   Franke, Felix ^f   Einevoll, Gaute T ^a,e  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Nervana Systems   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^f ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Benchmark data; Extracellular potential; Methods validation; Multicompartment model; Open source software; Spike sorting

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; C57BL MOUSE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; MICROELECTRODE; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RETINA; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SYNAPSE; VISUAL CORTEX;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICS; BRAIN WAVES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICROELECTRODES; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RETINA; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SYNAPSES; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 84937706966     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Arthur D., Vassilvitskii S. K-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms. SODA'07 2007, 1027-1035. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1283383.1283494.
2. Bahl A., Stemmler M.B., Herz A.V.M., Roth A. Automated optimization of a reduced layer 5 pyramidal cell model based on experimental data. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 210(September (1)):22-34. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.04.006.
3. Barrera R.G., Guzmán O., Balaguer B. Point charge in a three-layered dielectric medium with planar interfaces. Am J Phys 1978, 46(11):1172-1179. 10.1119/1.11501.
4. Blanche T.J., Spacek M.A., Hetke J.F., Swindale N.V. Polytrodes: high-density silicon electrode arrays for large-scale multiunit recording. J Neurophysiol 2005, 93(May (5)):2987-3000. 10.1152/jn.01023.2004.
5. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 1997, 10(4):433-436. 10.1163/156856897X00357.
6. Brown E.N., Barbieri R., Ventura V., Kass R.E., Frank L.M. The time-rescaling theorem and its application to neural spike train data analysis. Neural Comput 2002, 14(February (2)):325-346. 10.1162/08997660252741149.
7. Brunel N. Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. J Comput Neurosci 2000, 8(3):183-208. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10809012.
8. Buzsáki G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7(May (5)):446-451. 10.1038/nn1233.
9. Camuñas Mesa L.A., Quiroga R.Q. A detailed and fast model of extracellular recordings. Neural Comput 2013, 25(March (5)):1191-1212. 10.1162/NECO_a_00433.
10. Deb K., Kalyanmoy D. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
11. Delescluse M., Pouzat C. Efficient spike-sorting of multi-state neurons using inter-spike intervals information. J Neurosci Methods 2006, 150(January (1)):16-29. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.05.023.
12. Denker M., Einevoll G.T., Franke F., Grün S., Hagen E., Kerr J., et al. Report from 1st INCF workshop on validation of analysis methods, Tech. rep. 2014, International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF).
13. Destexhe A., Paré D. Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81(April (4)):1531-1547. URL http://jn.physiology.org/content/81/4/1531.
14. Destexhe A., Rudolph M., Fellous J.-M., Sejnowski T. Fluctuating synaptic conductances recreate in vivo-like activity in neocortical neurons. Neuroscience 2001, 107(1):13-24. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00344-X.
15. Devor A., Bandettini P.A., Boas D.A., Bower J.M., Buxton R.B., Cohen L.B., et al. The challenge of connecting the dots in the B.R.A.I.N. Neuron 2013, 80(October (2)):270-274. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.008.
16. Druckmann S., Banitt Y., Gidon A., Schürmann F., Markram H., Segev I. A novel multiple objective optimization framework for constraining conductance-based neuron models by experimental data. Front Neurosci 2007, 1(November (1)):7-18. 10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.001.2007.
17. Eaton K.P., Henriquez C.S. Confounded spikes generated by synchrony within neural tissue models. Neurocomputing 2005, 65-66:851-857. 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.082.
18. Einevoll G., Kayser C., Logothetis N., Panzeri S. Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013, 14:770-785. 10.1038/nrn3599.
19. Einevoll G.T., Franke F., Hagen E., Pouzat C., Harris K.D. Towards reliable spike-train recordings from thousands of neurons with multielectrodes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012, 22(February (1)):11-17. 10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.001.
20. Einevoll G.T., Lindén H., Tetzlaff T., Łeski S., Pettersen K.H. Local field potential: biophysical origin and analysis. Principles of neural coding 2013, CRC Press. R.Q. Quiroga, S. Panzeri (Eds.).
21. Eppler J.M., Helias M., Müller E., Diesmann M., Gewaltig M.-O. PyNEST: a convenient interface to the NEST simulator. Front Neuroinform 2008, 2(January):12. 10.3389/neuro.11.012.2008.
22. Fee M.S., Mitra P.P., Kleinfeld D. Automatic sorting of multiple unit neuronal signals in the presence of anisotropic and non-Gaussian variability. J Neurosci Methods 1996, 69(November (2)):175-188. 10.1016/S0165-0270(96)00050-7.
23. Fee M.S., Mitra P.P., Kleinfeld D. Variability of extracellular spike waveforms of cortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 1996, 76(December (6)):3823-3833. URL http://jn.physiology.org/content/76/6/3823.
24. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A 1987, 4(December (12)):2379-2394. 10.1364/JOSAA.4.002379.
25. Fiscella M., Farrow K., Jones I.L., Jäckel D., Müller J., Frey U., et al. Recording from defined populations of retinal ganglion cells using a high-density CMOS-integrated microelectrode array with real-time switchable electrode selection. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 211(October (1)):103-113. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.08.017.
26. Franke F., Jäckel D., Dragas J., Müller J., Radivojevic M., Bakkum D., et al. High-density microelectrode array recordings and real-time spike sorting for closed-loop experiments: an emerging technology to study neural plasticity. Front Neural Circuits 2012, 6:105. 10.3389/fncir.2012.00105.
27. Franke F., Natora M., Meier P., Hagen E., Pettersen K.H., Linden H., et al. An automated online positioning system and simulation environment for multi-electrodes in extracellular recordings. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010, 2010:593-597. 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626631.
28. Frey U., Egert U., Heer F., Hafizovic S., Hierlemann A. Microelectronic system for high-resolution mapping of extracellular electric fields applied to brain slices. Biosens Bioelectron 2009, 24(March (7)):2191-2198. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.11.028.
29. Frey U., Sedivy J., Heer F., Pedron R., Ballini M., Mueller J., et al. Switch-matrix-based high-density microelectrode array in cmos technology. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 2010, 45(February (2)):467-482. 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2035196.
30. Gewaltig M.-O., Diesmann M. Nest (neural simulation tool). Scholarpedia 2007, 2(4):1430. URL http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/NEST_(NEural_Simulation_Tool).
31. Gold C., Girardin C.C., Martin K.A.C., Koch C. High-amplitude positive spikes recorded extracellularly in cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 2009, 102(December (6)):3340-3351. 10.1152/jn.91365.2008.
32. Gold C., Henze D.A., Koch C. Using extracellular action potential recordings to constrain compartmental models. J Comput Neurosci 2007, 23(August (1)):39-58. 10.1007/s10827-006-0018-2.
33. Gold C., Henze D.A., Koch C., Buzsáki G. On the origin of the extracellular action potential waveform: a modeling study. J Neurophysiol 2006, 95(May (5)):3113-3128. 10.1152/jn.00979.2005.
34. Goto T., Hatanaka R., Ogawa T., Sumiyoshi A., Riera J., Kawashima R. An evaluation of the conductivity profile in the somatosensory barrel cortex of Wistar rats. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104(December (6)):3388-3412. 10.1152/jn.00122.2010.
35. Gray C.M., Maldonado P.E., Wilson M., McNaughton B. Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex. J Neurosci Methods 1995, 63(December (1-2)):43-54. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8788047.
36. Hämäläinen M., Haari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and application to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 1993, 65:413-496. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413.
37. Harris K.D., Henze D.A., Csicsvari J., Hirase H., Buzsáki G. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84(July (1)):401-414. URL http://jn.physiology.org/content/84/1/401.
38. Harris K.D., Hirase H., Leinekugel X., Henze D.A., Buzsáki G. Temporal interaction between single spikes and complex spike bursts in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Neuron 2001, 32(October (1)):141-149. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00447-0.
39. Hay E., Hill S., Schürmann F., Markram H., Segev I. Models of neocortical layer 5b pyramidal cells capturing a wide range of dendritic and perisomatic active properties. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7(July (7)):e1002107. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002107.
40. Hay E., Schürmann F., Markram H., Segev I. Preserving axosomatic spiking features despite diverse dendritic morphology. J Neurophysiol 2013, 109(June (12)):2972-2981. 10.1152/jn.00048.2013.
41. Hendrickson E.B., Edgerton J.R., Jaeger D. The capabilities and limitations of conductance-based compartmental neuron models with reduced branched or unbranched morphologies and active dendrites. J Comput Neurosci 2011, 30(April (2)):301-321. 10.1007/s10827-010-0258-z.
42. Henze D.A., Borhegyi Z., Csicsvari J., Mamiya A., Harris K.D., Buzsáki G. Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol 2000, 84(July (1)):390-400. URL http://jn.physiology.org/content/84/1/390.
43. Hierlemann A., Frey U., Hafizovic S., Heer F. Growing cells atop microelectronic chips: interfacing electrogenic cells in vitro with cmos-based microelectrode arrays. Proc IEEE 2011, 99(February (2)):252-284. 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2066532.
44. Hill D.N., Mehta S.B., Kleinfeld D. Quality metrics to accompany spike sorting of extracellular signals. J Neurosci 2011, 31(June (24)):8699-8705. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0971-11.2011.
45. Hines M.L., Davison A.P., Müller E. Neuron and python. Front Neuroinform 2009, 3:1-12. 10.3389/neuro.11.001.2009.
46. Hines M.L., Morse T., Migliore M., Carnevale N.T., Shepherd G.M. ModelDB: a database to support computational neuroscience. J Comput Neurosci 2004, 17(1):7-11. 10.1023/B:JCNS.0000023869.22017.2e.
47. Hockney R.W. The science of computer benchmarking 1996, Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, United States. 10.1137/1.9780898719666.
48. Holt G.R., Koch C. Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies. J Comput Neurosci 1999, 6(March (2)):169-184. 10.1023/A:1008832702585.
49. Insel T.R., Landis S.C., Collins F.S. Research priorities. The NIH brain initiative. Science 2013, 340(May (6133)):687-688. 10.1126/science.1239276.
50. Kriener B., Helias M., Aertsen A., Rotter S. Correlations in spiking neuronal networks with distance dependent connections. J Comput Neurosci 2009, 27(October (2)):177-200. 10.1007/s10827-008-0135-1.
51. Kriener B., Helias M., Rotter S., Diesmann M., Einevoll G.T. How pattern formation in ring networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons depends on the input current regime. Front Comput Neurosci 2014, 7(187). 10.3389/fncom.2013.00187.
52. Lambacher A., Vitzthum V., Zeitler R., Eickenscheidt M., Eversmann B., Thewes R., et al. Identifying firing mammalian neurons in networks with high-resolution multi-transistor array (MTA). Appl Phys A 2011, 102(1):1-11. 10.1007/s00339-010-6046-9.
53. Langtangen H. A primer on scientific programming with Python. Mathematics and statistics 2009, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, URL http://books.google.no/books?id=cVof07z_rA4C.
54. Larson M.G., Bengzon F. The finite element method: theory, implementation, and applications 2013, Springer.
55. Łeski S., Lindén H., Tetzlaff T., Pettersen K.H., Einevoll G.T. Frequency dependence of signal power and spatial reach of the local field potential. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9:e1003137. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003137.
56. Le Bé J.-V., Silberberg G., Wang Y., Markram H. Morphological, electrophysiological, and synaptic properties of corticocallosal pyramidal cells in the neonatal rat neocortex. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17(September (9)):2204-2213. 10.1093/cercor/bhl127.
57. Lempka S.F., Johnson M.D., Moffitt M.A., Otto K.J., Kipke D.R., McIntyre C.C. Theoretical analysis of intracortical microelectrode recordings. J Neural Eng 2011, 8(August (4)):045006. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/045006.
58. Lewicki M.S. A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network 1998, 9(November (4)):R53-78. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10221571.
59. Lindén H., Hagen E., Łeski S., Norheim E.S., Pettersen K.H., Einevoll G.T. LFPy: a tool for biophysical simulation of extracellular potentials generated by detailed model neurons. Front Neuroinform 2014, 7(41). 10.3389/fninf.2013.00041.
60. Lindén H., Pettersen K.H., Einevoll G.T. Intrinsic dendritic filtering gives low-pass power spectra of local field potentials. J Comput Neurosci 2010, 29(December (3)):423-444. 10.1007/s10827-010-0245-4.
61. Lindén H., Tetzlaff T., Potjans T., Pettersen K., Grün S., Diesmann M., et al. Modeling the spatial reach of the LFP. Neuron 2011, 72(December (5)):859-872. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.006.
62. Logothetis N.K., Kayser C., Oeltermann A. In vivo measurement of cortical impedance spectrum in monkeys: implications for signal propagation. Neuron 2007, 55(September (5)):809-823. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.027.
63. Mardia K., Jupp P. Directional statistics. Wiley series in probability and statistics 2009, Wiley. 10.1002/9780470316979.
64. Martinez J., Pedreira C., Ison M.J., Quiroga R.Q. Realistic simulation of extracellular recordings. J Neurosci Methods 2009, 184(November (2)):285-293. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.08.017.
65. Mechler F., Victor J.D. Dipole characterization of single neurons from their extracellular action potentials. J Comput Neurosci 2011, 32(1):73-100. 10.1007/s10827-011-0341-0.
66. Menne K.M., Folkers A., Malina T., Maex R., Hofmann U.G. Test of spike-sorting algorithms on the basis of simulated network data. Neurocomputing 2002, 44-46:1119-1126. 10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00432-0.
67. Nelson M.J., Pouget P. Do electrode properties create a problem in interpreting local field potential recordings?. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103(May (5)):2315-2317. 10.1152/jn.00157.2010.
68. Nelson M.J., Pouget P., Nilsen E.A., Patten C.D., Schall J.D. Review of signal distortion through metal microelectrode recording circuits and filters. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 169(March (1)):141-157. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.12.010.
69. Ness T.B., Hagen E., Negwer M., Bakker R., Schubert D., Einevoll G.T. Modeling extracellular spikes and local field potentials recorded in MEAs. Proceedings of the 8th international meeting on multielectrode arrays 2012, 234-236. Natural and Medical Sciences Institute (NMI), University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany, URL http://www.nmi1.de/meameeting2012/.
70. Ness T.V., Chintaluri C., Potworowski J., Łeski S., Głabska H., Wójcik D.K., et al. Modelling and analysis of electrical potentials recorded in microelectrode arrays (MEAs). Neuroinformatics 2015, [in press]. 10.1007/s12021-015-9265-6.
71. Nunez P.L., Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG 2006, Oxford University Press, Inc. 2nd ed., 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001.
72. Palmer S.E. Vision science: photons to phenomenology 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, URL http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/vision-science.
73. Pettersen K.H., Einevoll G.T. Amplitude variability and extracellular low-pass filtering of neuronal spikes. Biophys J 2008, 94(February (3)):784-802. 10.1529/biophysj.107.111179.
74. Pettersen K.H., Hagen E., Einevoll G.T. Estimation of population firing rates and current source densities from laminar electrode recordings. J Comput Neurosci 2008, 24(June (3)):291-313. 10.1007/s10827-007-0056-4.
75. Pettersen K.H., Lindén H., Dale A.M., Einevoll G.T. Extracellular spikes and CSD. Handbook of neural activity measurement September 2012, 92-135. Cambridge University Press. R. Brette, A. Destexhe (Eds.).
76. Pettersen K.H., Lindén H., Tetzlaff T., Einevoll G.T. Power laws from linear neuronal cable theory: power spectral densities of the soma potential, soma membrane current and single-neuron contribution to the eeg. PLoS Comput Biol 2014, 10(11):e1003928. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003928.
77. Pillow J.W., Shlens J., Paninski L., Sher A., Litke A.M., Chichilnisky E.J., et al. Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population. Nature 2008, 454(August (7207)):995-999. 10.1038/nature07140.
78. Quirk M.C., Wilson M.A. Interaction between spike waveform classification and temporal sequence detection. J Neurosci Methods 1999, 94(December (1)):41-52. 10.1016/S0165-0270(99)00124-7.
79. Quiroga R.Q. Spike sorting. Scholarpedia 2007, 2(12):3583. URL http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Spike_sorting.
80. Rall W. Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. Biophys J 1962, 2(March (2 Pt 2)):145-167.
81. Ranck J. Studies on single neurons in dorsal hippocampal formation and septum in unrestrained rats. I. Behavioral correlates and firing repertoires. Exp Neurol 1973, 41(November (2)):461-531. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4355646.
82. Reimann M.W., Anastassiou C.A., Perin R., Hill S.L., Markram H., Koch C. A biophysically detailed model of neocortical local field potentials predicts the critical role of active membrane currents. Neuron 2013, 79(July (2)):375-390. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.023.
83. Rinberg D., Davidowitz H., Tishby N. Multi-electrode spike sorting by clustering transfer functions. Advances in neural information processing systems 1999, vol. 11. MIT Press. M.S. Kearns, S.A. Solla, D. Cohn (Eds.).
84. Robinson D. The electrical properties of metal microelectrodes. Proc IEEE 1968, 56(6):1065-1071. 10.1109/PROC.1968.6458.
85. Roth A., van Rossum C.W. Modelling synapses. Computational modeling methods for neuroscientists 2009, 139-161. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, [Chapter 6], URL http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/computational-modeling-methods-neuroscientists. 1st ed. E. De Schutter (Ed.).
86. Segev R., Goodhouse J., Puchalla J., Berry M.J. Recording spikes from a large fraction of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7(October (10)):1154-1161. 10.1038/nn1323.
87. Segev R., Puchalla J., Berry M.J. Functional organization of ganglion cells in the salamander retina. J Neurophysiol 2006, 95(April (4)):2277-2292. 10.1152/jn.00928.2005.
88. Sheasby B.W., Fohlmeister J.F. Impulse encoding across the dendritic morphologies of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81(April (4)):1685-1698. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10200204.
89. Smith L.S., Mtetwa N. A tool for synthesizing spike trains with realistic interference. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 159:170-180. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.06.019.
90. Somogyvári Z., Zalányi L., Ulbert I., Erdi P. Model-based source localization of extracellular action potentials. J Neurosci Methods 2005, 147(September (2)):126-137. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.04.002.
91. Stratton P., Cheung A., Wiles J., Kiyatkin E., Sah P., Windels F. Action potential waveform variability limits multi-unit separation in freely behaving rats. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(6):e38482. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038482.
92. Advances in network electrophysiology: using multi-electrode arrays 2006, Springer, Berlin. M. Taketani, M. Baudry (Eds.).
93. Tetzlaff T., Diesmann M. Dependence of spike-count correlations on spike-train statistics and observation time scale. Analysis of parallel spike trains 2010, 103-128. Springer, [Chapter 6]. 10.1007/978-1-4419-5675-0_6. S. Grün, S. Rotter (Eds.).
94. The HDF Group Hierarchical data format version 5 2000-2010, URL http://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5.
95. Thorbergsson P., Garwicz M., Schouenborg J., Johansson A. Statistical modelling of spike libraries for simulation of extracellular recordings in the cerebellum. Proc. 32nd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBS) 2010, 4250-4253.
96. Thorbergsson P.T., Garwicz M., Schouenborg J., Johansson A.J. Computationally efficient simulation of extracellular recordings with multielectrode arrays. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 211(August (1)):133-144. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.08.011.
97. Tuckwell H.C., Wan F.Y.M., Rospars J.-P. A spatial stochastic neuronal model with Ornstein-Uhlenbeck input current. Biol Cybern 2002, 86(February (2)):137-145. 10.1007/s004220100283.
98. Uhlenbeck G.E., Ornstein L.S. On the theory of the brownian motion. Phys Rev 1930, 36(September):823-841. 10.1103/PhysRev.36.823.
99. Ulbert I., Halgren E., Heit G., Karmos G. Multiple microelectrode-recording system for human intracortical applications. J Neurosci Methods 2001, 106:69-79.
100. Van Geit W., De Schutter E., Achard P. Automated neuron model optimization techniques: a review. Biol Cybern 2008, 99(November (4-5)):241-251. 10.1007/s00422-008-0257-6.
101. Wood F., Black M.J., Vargas-Irwin C., Fellows M., Donoghue J.P. On the variability of manual spike sorting. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51(June (6)):912-918. 10.1109/TBME.2004.826677.