Effects of time lag and frequency matching on phase-based connectivity

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 250, Issue , 2015, Pages 137-146

  Cohen, Michael X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

EEG connectivity; Laplacian; Oscillations; Phase clustering; Phase lag index; Phase locking value

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONNECTOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPOLE; HUMAN; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PHASE BASED CONNECTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TIME; TIME LAG; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE TRACT; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84937621200     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ahissar E., Nagarajan S., Ahissar M., Protopapas A., Mahncke H., Merzenich M.M. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:13367-13372.
2. Appelbaum L.G., Smith D.V., Boehler C.N., Chen W.D., Woldorff M.G. Rapid modulation of sensory processing induced by stimulus conflict. J Cogn Neurosci 2011, 23:2620-2628.
3. Bush P., Sejnowski T. Inhibition synchronizes sparsely connected cortical neurons within and between columns in realistic network models. J Comput Neurosci 1996, 3:91-110.
4. Cabral J., Kringelbach M.L., Deco G. Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest. Prog Neurobiol 2014, 114:102-131.
5. Cohen M.X. Fluctuations in oscillation frequency control spike timing and coordinate neural networks. J Neurosci 2014, 34(27):8988-8998.
6. Cohen M.X. Analyzing neural time series data: theory and practice 2014, MIT Press, Cambridge.
7. Cohen M.X. Comparison of different spatial filters applied to EEG data: a case study of error processing. Int J Psychophysiol 2014, in press.
8. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
9. Foffani G., Bianchi A.M., Baselli G., Priori A. Movement-related frequency modulation of beta oscillatory activity in the human subthalamic nucleus 2005.
10. Fries P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci 2005, 9:474-480.
11. Gramfort A., Papadopoulo T., Olivi E., Clerc M. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics. Biomed Eng Online 2010, 9:45.
12. Haegens S., Cousijn H., Wallis G., Harrison P.J., Nobre A.C. Inter- and intra-individual variability in alpha peak frequency. Neuroimage 2014, 1-10.
13. Hoppensteadt F.C., Izhikevich E.M. Thalamo-cortical interactions modeled by weakly connected oscillators: could the brain use FM radio principles?. BioSystems 1998, 85-94.
14. Hutchison R.M., Womelsdorf T., Allen E.A., Bandettini P.A., Calhoun V.D., Corbetta M., et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 2013, 80:360-378.
15. Kaplan A.Y., Fingelkurts A.A., Fingelkurts A.A., Borisov S.V., Darkhovsky B.S. Nonstationary nature of the brain activity as revealed by EEG/MEG: methodological, practical and conceptual challenges. Signal Process 2005, 85:2190-2212.
16. Nolte G., Bai O., Wheaton L., Mari Z., Vorbach S., Hallett M. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115:2292-2307.
17. Nunez P.L., Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG 2005, Oxford University Press, USA. 2nd ed.
18. Ray S., Maunsell J.H.R. Differences in gamma frequencies across visual cortex restrict their possible use in computation. Neuron 2010, 67:885-896.
19. Roberts M.J., Lowet E., Brunet N.M., Ter Wal M., Tiesinga P., Fries P., et al. Robust gamma coherence between macaque V1 and V2 by dynamic frequency matching. Neuron 2013, 78:523-536.
20. Rudrauf D., Douiri A., Kovach C., Lachaux J.-P., Cosmelli D., Chavez M., et al. Frequency flows and the time-frequency dynamics of multivariate phase synchronization in brain signals. Neuroimage 2006, 31:209-227.
21. Sancristóbal B., Vicente R., Garcia-Ojalvo J. Role of frequency mismatch in neuronal communication through coherence. J Comput Neurosci 2014, 37(2):193-208.
22. Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S., Poeppel D., Marantz A. Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002, 49:1534-1546.
23. Sekihara K., Owen J.P., Trisno S., Nagarajan S.S. Removal of spurious coherence in MEG source-space coherence analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011, 58:3121-3129.
24. Sporns O. Networks of the brain 2010, MIT Press, Cambridge.
25. Srinivasan R. Methods to improve the spatial resolution of EEG. Int J Bioelectromagn 1999, 1:102-111.
26. Srinivasan R., Winter W.R., Ding J., Nunez P.L. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 166:41-52.
27. Srinivasan R., Winter W.R., Nunez P.L. Source analysis of EEG oscillations using high-resolution EEG and MEG. Prog Brain Res 2006, 159:29-42.
28. Stam C.J., Nolte G., Daffertshofer A. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp 2007, 28:1178-1193.
29. Tadel F., Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Pantazis D., Leahy R.M. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cin/2011/879716/cta/.
30. Tognoli E., Kelso J.A.S. Spectral dissociation of lateralized pairs of brain rhythms 2013, 6.
31. Varela F., Lachaux J.P., Rodriguez E., Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001, 2:229-239.
32. Vinck M., Oostenveld R., van Wingerden M., Battaglia F., Pennartz C.M.A. An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage 2011, 55:1548-1565.
33. Winter W.R., Nunez P.L., Ding J., Srinivasan R. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence. Stat Med 2007, 26:3946-3957.