Spatial obfuscation methods for privacy protection of household-level data

Applied Geography

Volumn 63, Issue , 2015, Pages 253-263

  Seidl, Dara E ^a   Paulus, Gernot ^b   Jankowski, Piotr ^a,c   Regenfelder, Melanie ^b  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARINTHIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Geoprivacy; Masking; Obfuscation; Privacy

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; NEAREST NEIGHBOR ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84937551416     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. AbdelMalik P., Boulos M.N.K., Jones R. The perceived impact of location privacy: a web-based survey of public health perspectives and requirements in the UK and Canada. BMC Public Health 2008, 8. 10.1186/1471-2458-8-156.
2. Allshouse W.B., Fitch M.K., Hampton K.H., Gesink D.C., Doherty I.A., Leone P.A., et al. Geomasking sensitive health data and privacy protection: an evaluation using an E911 database. Geocarto International 2010, 25(6):443-452. 10.1080/10106049.2010.496496.
3. Armstrong M.P., Rushton G., Zimmerman D.L. Geographically masking health data to preserve confidentiality. Statistics in Medicine 1999, 18(5):497-525.
4. Aurenhammer F., Klein R. Voronoi diagrams. Handbook of computational geometry 2000, 201-290. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, doi: 10.1.1.61.7055. J.-R. Sack, J. Urrutia (Eds.).
5. Cassa C.A., Wieland S.C., Mandl K.D. Re-identification of home addresses from spatial locations anonymized by Gaussian skew. International Journal of Health Geographics 2008, 7(45):1-9. 10.1186/1476-072X-7-45.
6. Clark I. Practical geostatistics 1979, Applied Science Publishers, London.
7. Clifton K.J., Gehrke S.R. Application of geographic perturbation methods to residential locations in the Oregon household activity survey: proof of concept. Transportation Research Record 2013, 2354:40-50. 10.3141/2354-05.
8. Curtis A., Mills J.W., Agustin L., Cockburn M. Confidentiality risks in fine scale aggregations of health data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35(1):57-64. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.08.002.
9. Duckham M., Kulik L. Location privacy and location-aware computing. Dynamic & mobile GIS: Investigating change in space and time 2007, 34-51. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. J. Drummond, R. Billen, E. Joao, D. Forrest (Eds.).
10. Elwood S., Leszczynski A. Privacy, reconsidered: new representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum 2011, 42(1):6-15. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003.
11. EU Fundamental Rights Agency Annual report 2010 2010, At, Accessed 10.03.15. http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/917-AR_2010-conf-edition_en.pdf.
12. Griffith D. Spatial autocorrelation: A primer 1987, Association of American Geographers Resource Publication, Washington, DC.
13. Hampton K.H., Fitch M.K., Allshouse W.B., Doherty I.A., Gesink D.C., Leone P.A., et al. Mapping health data: improved privacy protection with donut method geomasking. American Journal of Epidemiology 2010, 172(9):1062-1069. 10.1093/aje/kwq248.
14. Kounadi O., Leitner M. Why does geoprivacy matter? The scientific publication of confidential data presented on maps. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2014, 9(4). 10.1177/1556264614544103.
15. Kounadi O., Leitner M. Spatial information divergence: using global and local indices to compare geographical masks applied to crime data. Transactions in GIS 2014, 10.1111/tgis.12125.
16. Krumm J. Inference attacks on location tracks. Proceedings 5th International Conference, PERVASIVE 2007, May 13-16, 2007, Toronto, Canada 2007, 127-143. 10.1007/978-3-540-72037-9_8.
17. Kwan M.P., Casas I., Schmitz B.C. Protection of geoprivacy and accuracy of spatial information: how effective are geographical masks?. Cartographica 2004, 39:15-28. 10.3138/X204-4223-57MK-8273.
18. Leitner M., Curtis A. Cartographic guidelines for geographically masking the locations of confidential point data. Cartographic Perspectives 2004, 49:22-39. 10.14714/CP49.439.
19. Levine N. Crime mapping and the CrimeStat program. Geographical Analysis 2006, 38:41-56. 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00673.x.
20. Luo L., McLafferty S., Wang F. Analyzing spatial aggregation error in statistical models of late-stage cancer risk: a Monte Carlo simulation approach. International Journal of Health Geographics 2010, 9(51):1-14. 10.1186/1476-072X-9-51.
21. Nouwt S. Reasonable expectations of geo-privacy?. SCRIPTed 375 2008, 5(2). at, Accessed 10.11.14. http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol5%5F2/nouwt.pdf/, 10.2966/scrip.050208.375.
22. Olson K.L., Grannis S.J., Mandl K.D. Privacy protection versus cluster detection in spatial epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health 2006, 96(11):2002-2008. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069526.
23. Paulus G., Kosar B., Erlacher C., Anders K.H. Energy efficient communities - development of a WebGIS portal for managing local energy data. Proceedings American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, April 8-12, 2014, Tampa, FL 2014.
24. Shi X., Alford-Teaster J., Onega T. Kernel density estimation with geographically masked points. Proceedings 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, August 12-14 2009, Fairfax, VA 2009, 1-4. 10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2009.5292881.
25. Statistics Austria STATCube statistical database 2014, at, Accessed 10.08.14. http://statcube.at/superwebguest/.
26. Sweeney L. k-Anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. International Journal on Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems 2002, 10(5):557-570. 10.1142/S0218488502001648.
27. Voronoi G.F. Nouvelles applications des parametres continus a la theorie des formes quadratiques. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 1908, 134:198-287. 10.1515/crll.1908.134.198.
28. Weiser P., Scheider S. Acivilized cyberspace for geoprivacy. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Privacy in Geographic Information Collection and Analysis (GeoPrivacy '14) 2014, Vol. 5:1-8. 10.1145/2675682.2676396.
29. Wieland S.C., Cassa C.A., Mandl K.D., Berger B. Revealing the spatial distribution of a disease while preserving privacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States 2008, 105(46):17608-17613. 10.1073/pnas.0801021105.
30. Zandbergen P.A. Ensuring confidentiality of geocoded health data: assessing geographic masking strategies for individual-level data. Advances in Medicine 2014, 2014:1-14. 10.1155/2014/567049.
31. Zimmerman D.L., Pavlik C. Quantifying the effects of mask metadata disclosure and multiple releases on the confidentiality of geographically masked health data. Geographical Analysis 2008, 40(1):52-76. 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2007.00713.x.