Backbone dependency further improves side chain prediction efficiency in the Energy-based Conformer Library (bEBL)

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 3177-3187

  Subramaniam, Sabareesh ^a   Senes, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Conformer; Protein prediction; Rotamer; Side chain library; Side chain optimization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY BASED CONFORMER LIBRARY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84937547808     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24685     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fiser A, Feig M, Brooks CL3rd, Sali A. Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling. Acc Chem Res 2002;35:413-421.
2. Nayeem A, Sitkoff D, Krystek S. A comparative study of available software for high-accuracy homology modeling: from sequence alignments to structural models. Prot Sci 2006;15:808-824.
3. Wallner B, Elofsson A. All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Prot Sci 2005;14:1315-1327.
4. Bordoli L, Kiefer F, Arnold K, Benkert P, Battey J, Schwede T. Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace. Nat Protoc 2008;4:1-13.
5. Wang Q, Canutescu AA, Dunbrack RL. SCWRL and MolIDE: computer programs for side-chain conformation prediction and homology modeling. Nat Protoc 2008;3:1832-1847.
6. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(suppl 2):W526-W531.
7. Mueller BK, Subramaniam S, Senes A. A frequent, GxxxG-mediated, transmembrane association motif is optimized for the formation of interhelical Cα-H hydrogen bonds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:E888-E895.
8. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL. Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997;94:10172-10177.
9. Street AG, Mayo SL. Computational protein design. Structure 1999;7:R105-R109.
10. Senes A. Computational design of membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:460-466.
11. Samish I, MacDermaid CM, Perez-Aguilar JM, Saven JG. Theoretical and computational protein design. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2011;62:129-149.
12. Schaffer L, Verkhivker GM. Predicting structural effects in HIV-1 protease mutant complexes with flexible ligand docking and protein side-chain optimization. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 1998;33:295-310.
13. LaPointe LM, Taylor KC, Subramaniam S, Khadria A, Rayment I, Senes A. Structural organization of FtsB, a transmembrane protein of the bacterial divisome. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2013;52:2574-2585.
14. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
15. Qian B. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 2007;450:259-264.
16. Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2009;66:12-21.
17. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
18. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
19. Russ WP, Ranganathan R. Knowledge-based potential functions in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:447-452.
20. Desmet J, Maeyer MD, Hazes B, Lasters I. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature 1992;356:539-542.
21. Gordon DB, Mayo SL. Branch-and-terminate: a combinatorial optimization algorithm for protein design. Struct Lond Engl 1993 1999;7:1089-1098.
22. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL Jr. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc 2003;12:2001-2014.
23. Koehl P, Delarue M. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J Mol Biol 1994;239:249-275.
24. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:171-176.
25. Xiang Z, Honig B. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2001;311:421-430.
26. Dunbrack RL, Cohen FE. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc 1997;6:1661-1681.
27. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 2000;40:389-408.
28. Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL Jr. A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. Struct Lond Engl 1993 2011;19:844-858.
29. Shetty RP, De Bakker PIW, DePristo MA, Blundell TL. Advantages of fine-grained side chain conformer libraries. Protein Eng 2003;16:963-969.
30. Subramaniam S, Senes A. An energy-based conformer library for side chain optimization: improved prediction and adjustable sampling. Proteins 2012;80:2218-2234.
31. Lassila JK, Privett HK, Allen BD, Mayo SL. Combinatorial methods for small-molecule placement in computational enzyme design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:16710-16715.
32. Peterson RW, Dutton PL, Wand AJ. Improved side-chain prediction accuracy using an ab initio potential energy function and a very large rotamer library. Protein Sci 2004;13:735-751.
33. Mendes J, Baptista AM, Carrondo MA, Soares CM. Improved modeling of side-chains in proteins with rotamer-based methods: a flexible rotamer model. Proteins 1999;37:530-543.
34. Chakrabarti P, Pal D. The interrelationships of side-chain and main-chain conformations in proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2001;76:1-102.
35. Dunbrack RL Jr. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:431-440.
36. Dunbrack RL Jr, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 1993;230:543-574.
37. Dunbrack RL, Karplus M. Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains. Nat Struct Mol Biol 1994;1:334-340.
38. Kulp DW, Subramaniam S, Donald JE, Hannigan BT, Mueller BK, Grigoryan G, Senes A. Structural informatics, modeling, and design with an open-source Molecular Software Library (MSL). J Comput Chem 2012;33:1645-1661.
39. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 1999;285:1735-1747.
40. Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL Jr. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 2009;77:778-795.