Grand challenges for modeling and simulation: Simulation everywhere—from cyberinfrastructure to clouds to citizens

SIMULATION

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 648-665

  Taylor, Simon J E ^a   Khan, Azam ^b   Morse, Katherine L ^c   Tolk, Andreas ^d   Yilmaz, Levent ^e   Zander, Justyna ^f   Mosterman, Pieter J ^g  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b AUTODESK RESEARCH   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

^d SimIS Inc   (United States)

^e AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Non Profit Initiative ^*  (Poland)

^g MATHWORKS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Big Simulation; cloud; composability; cyberinfrastructures; democratization; e Infrastructures; e Science; grand challenges; human behavior; Modeling; reproducibility; simulation

Indexed keywords

CLOUDS; MODELS; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

BIG SIMULATION; COMPOSABILITY; CYBER INFRASTRUCTURES; DEMOCRATIZATION; E-INFRASTRUCTURES; E-SCIENCES; GRAND CHALLENGE; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SIMULATION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84937546043     PISSN: 00375497     EISSN: 17413133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0037549715590594     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Fujimoto R.M. Lunceford D. Page E. et al. Grand challenges for modeling and simulation Dagsthul Report, www.dagstuhl.de/02351 (2002, accessed 6 October 2013).
2. Page E.H. Lunceford W.H. Guest editorial special issue on grand challenges for modeling and simulation. Simulation 2004; 80: 419-420.
3. Fishwick P.A. Toward an integrative multimodeling interface: a human-computer interface approach to interrelating model structures. Simulation 2004; 80:421-432.
4. Mosterman P.J. Vangheluwe H. Computer automated multi-paradigm modeling: an introduction. Simulation 2004; 80: 433-450.
5. Eeckhout L. De Bosschere K. Speeding up architectural simulations for high-performance processors. Simulation 2004; 80:451-468.
6. Fowler J.W. Rose O. Grand challenges in modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing systems. Simulation 2004; 80: 469-476.
7. Taylor S.J.E. Fishwick P.A. Fujimoto R. et al. Panel on grand challenges for modeling and simulation. In: proceedings of the 2012 winter simulation conference, ACM Press, NY, 2012, Article No. 232.
8. Taylor S.J.E. Khan A. Morse K.L. et al. Grand challenges on the theory of modeling and simulation. In: proceedings of the 2013 symposium on the theory of modeling and simulation, SCS, Vista, CA, 2013, Article 34.
9. Taylor S.J.E. Balci O. Cai W. et al. Grand challenges in modeling and simulation: expanding our horizons. In: proceedings of the 2013 SIGSIM-PADS conference, ACM Press, NY, 2013, pp.403-408.
10. Taylor S.J.E. Brailsford S. Chick S.E. et al. Modeling and simulation grand challenges: an OR/MS perspective. In: proceedings of the 2013 winter simulation conference, ACM Press, NY, 2013, pp.1269-1282.
11. Bird I. Jones B. Kee K.F. The organization and management of grid infrastructures. Computer 2009; 42: 36-46.
12. Vangheluwe H.L. Vansteenkiste G.C. SiE: Simulation for the future. Simulation 1996; 66: 331-335.
13. Science Gateway. http://science-gateway.chain-project.eu/en_GB/ (accessed 1 June 2015).
14. Science Gateway Based User Support project. www.sci-bus.eu (accessed 1 June 2015).
15. Karr J.R. Sanghvi J.C. Macklin D.N. et al. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 2012; 150: 389-401.
16. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press, 1994.
17. Sokolov A.P. et al. The MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) Version 2: model description and baseline evaluation, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report Series (124), 2005, p.40.
18. Lloyd J. Stavness I. Fels S. ArtiSynth: a fast interactive biomechanical modeling toolkit combining multibody and finite element simulation. Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. New York: Springer, 2011, p.396.
19. M&SCO. DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Glossary, www.msco.mil (1 October 2011, accessed 1 June 2015).
20. Morse K.L. Schloman J. Toward data interoperability for HSCB Models. In: proceedings of the 2011 spring simulation interoperability workshop, Boston, MA, 4–8 April 2011.
21. Morse K.L. Riggs W. Schmorrow D. et al. Standards for HSCB, possible future or pure fantasy? In: proceedings of the 2012 fall simulation interoperability workshop, Orlando, FL, 10–14 September 2012.
22. Morse K.L. Petty M. Reynolds P. et al. Findings and recommendations from the 2003 composable mission space environments workshop. In proceedings of the 2004 spring simulation interoperability workshop, Arlington VA, 18–23 April 2004.
23. Velte T. Velte A. Elsenpeter R. Cloud computing, a practical approach. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2009.
24. Calheiros R.N. Ranjan R. Beloglazov A. et al. CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms, Software: Practice and Experience 2011; 41: 23-50.
25. Tolk A. Diallo S.Y. Turnitsa C.D. et al. Composable M&S web services for net-centric applications. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation 2006; 3: 27-44.
26. Brutzman D. Zyda M. Pullen J.M. et al. Extensible modeling and simulation framework (XMSF) challenges for web-based modeling and simulation, NPS Report, Monterey, CA, October 2002.
27. Blais C.L. Brutzman D. Drake D. et al. Extensible modeling and simulation framework (XMSF) 2004 project summary report, NPS Report, Monterey, CA, February 2005.
28. Neugebauer E. Nitsch D. Henne O. Architecture for a distributed integrated test bed, NATO Report RTO-MP-MSG-069, Brussel, Belgium, October 2009.
29. Wiedermann T. Simulation application service providing (SIM-ASP), In: proceedings of the 2001 winter simulation conference, ACM Press, NY, 2001, pp.623-628.
30. Fishwick P.A. Web-based simulation: some personal observations. In: proceedings of the 1996 winter simulation conference, ACM Press, NY, 1996, pp.772-779.
31. Turner M. Budgen D. Brereton P. Turning software into a service. Computer 2003; 36: 38-44.
32. Chigani A. Balci O. The process of architecting for software/system engineering. International Journal for System of Systems Engineering 2012; 3: 1-23.
33. Software Engineering Institute. Capability maturity model integration (CMMI), Carnegie Mellon University, http://cmmiinstitute.com/ (accessed 1 June 2015).
34. Tolk A. Diallo S.Y. Padilla J.J. et al. How is M&S interoperability different from other interoperability domains? In: proceedings of the spring simulation interoperability workshop, Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY, 2011, pp.12-20.
35. Hofmann M. Palii J. Mihelcic G. Epistemic and normative aspects of ontologies in modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation 2011; 5: 135-146.
36. Tolk A. Bair L.J. Diallo S.Y. Supporting network enabled capability by extending the levels of conceptual interoperability model to an interoperability maturity model. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation 2013; 10: 145-160.
37. ISO/IEC. 2013. ISO/IEC 11179-3:2013. Information technology – metadata registries (MDR) – Part 3: registry metamodel and basic attributes.
38. Tolk A. Diallo S.Y. Padilla J.J. et al. Reference modeling in support of M&S–foundations and applications. Journal of Simulation 2013; 7: 69-82.
39. Liu X. Qiu X. Chen B. et al. Cloud-based simulation: the state-of-the-art computer simulation paradigm. In: proceedings of the workshop on principles of advanced and distributed simulation (PADS), 2012, p.71-74.
40. Johnson H.E. Tolk A. Evaluating the applicability of cloud computing enterprises in support of the next generation of modeling and simulation architectures. In: proceedings of the 2013 spring simulation multi-conference, military modeling and simulation symposium (MMS), 2013, Article 4.
41. Marston S. Li Z. Bandyopadhyay S. et al. Cloud computing – the business perspective. Decision Support Systems 2011; 51: 176-189.
42. Kaufman L.M. Data security in the world of cloud computing. IEEE Security & Privacy 2009; 7: 61-64.
43. Subashini S. Kavitha V. A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2011; 34: 1-11.
44. Tolk A. Interoperability, composability, and their implications for distributed simulation. In: proceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACM international symposium on distributed simulation and real time applications (DS-RT 13), Delft, The Netherlands, 2013, pp.3-9.
45. Yilmaz L. Reproducibility in M&S research: issues, strategies, and implications for model development environments. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2012; 24: 457-474.
46. Mesirov J. Accessible reproducible research. Science 2010; 327: 415-416.
47. Fomel S. Claerbout J. Guest editors’ introduction: reproducible research. Computing in Science and Engineering 2009; 11: 5-7.
48. Economist. The clouds of unknowing. The Economist, 18 March 2010.
49. Baggerly K. Coombes K. Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology. Annals Applied Statistics 2009; 3: 1309-1334.
50. Alberts B. Editorial expression of concern. Science 2010; 327: 144.
51. Anand M. Bowers S. McPhillips T. et al. Exploring scientific workflow provenance using hybrid queries over nested data and lineage graphs. In: proceedings of the scientific and statistical database management, 2009, pp.237-254.
52. Estrin D. Participatory sensing: citizen science, scientific citizens, computational thinking. Invited speaker. In: NSF broader impacts for research and discovery summit, Washington D.C., 21–23 June 2010.
53. Kaczmarczyk L.C. Computers and society: computing for good. Chapman & Hall/CRC Textbooks in Computing. CRC Press, 2011.
54. Gardiner B. Designers, architects celebrate 25 years of computer-aided design. Wired, November 2007.
55. Mosterman P.J. Zander J. Advancing model-based design by modeling approximations of computational semantics. In: proceedings of the 4th international workshop on equation-based object-oriented modeling languages and tools (EOOLT 2011), Zürich, Switzerland, 5 September 2011.
56. Krasner J. Comparing embedded design outcomes with and without model based design, http://www.mathworks.com/tagteam/66775_2010_FINAL_MATHWORKS-%20Comparing%20MBD%20Designs_August%2011%202010_.pdf (2010, accessed 14 October 2013).
57. Zander J. Mosterman P.J. Computation for humanity—information technology to advance society. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2013.
58. Gee R.S. How tablets will transform construction, http://techcrunch.com/2012 / 03/11/tablets-will-transform-construction/ (2012, accessed 1 June 2015).
59. National Science Foundation. Advisory committee for cyberinfrastructure task force on grand challenges, Final Report, March 2011.
60. National Institute of Standards and Technology. U.S. Department of Commerce, Strategic Vision and Business Drivers for 21st Century Cyber-Physical Systemsmm, http://events.energetics.com/NIST-CPSWorkshop/pdfs/Exec_Roundtable_SumReport_Final_1-30-13.pdf (2013, accessed 1 June 2015).
61. Siemens. Self organizing factories. Pictures of the Future Magazine, Spring 2013.
62. Bullinger H.-J. et al. Where the new growth comes from. Innovation-policy impetus for a strong Germany on the global stage, Media services of Fraunhofer Informationszentrum IRB, Germany, http://www.forschungsunion.de/pdf/where_the_new_growth_comes_from.pdf (2009, accessed 1 June 2015).
63. Mosterman P.J. Bouldin D. Rucinski A. A peer reviewed online computational modeling framework. In: proceedings of the CDEN 2008 conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 27–29 July 2008.
64. Vale R.D. DeRisi J.P. Mullins R. et al. Interdisciplinary graduate training in teaching labs. Science 2012; 338: 1542.
65. Bongard J. Zykov V. Lipson H. Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling. Science 2006; 17: 1118-1121.
66. Zander-Nowicka J. Schieferdecker I. Pérez A.M. Automotive validation functions for on-line test evaluation of hybrid real-time systems. In: proceedings of the IEEE 41st Anniversary of the Systems Readiness Technology Conference 2006, Anaheim, CA, September 2006.
67. Bacon D.F. Rabbah R. Shukla S. FPGA programming for the masses. Communications of the ACM 2013; 56: 56-63.
68. Zander J. A vision on collaborative computation of things for personalized analyses. In: proceedings of the IEEE 21st international workshop on enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WETICE), 25–27 June 2012, pp.214-219.
69. Kahn J.M. Katz R.H. Pister K.S.J. Mobile networking for smart dust. In: proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom 99), Seattle, WA, 17–19 August 1999.
70. Savage N. Cycling through data. Communications of the ACM 2010; 53: 16-17.
71. Adami C. What do robots dream of? Science 2006; 314: 1093.
72. Goldenfeld N. Kadanoff L.P. Simple lessons from complexity. Science 1999; 284: 87.
73. Joppa L.N. McInerny G. Harper R. et al. Computational science troubling trends in scientific software use. Science 2013; 340: 814-815.
74. Pellegrino J.W. Proficiency in science: assessment challenges and opportunities. Science 2013; 340: 320-323.
75. Zander J. Mosterman P.J. (eds) Computation for humanity: information technology to advance society. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 2014.