Business process model and notation: The current state of affairs

Computer Science and Information Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 509-539

  Kocbek, Mateja ^a   Jošt, Gregor ^a   Heričko, Marjan ^a   Polančič, Gregor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Acceptance; BPMN; Business process modelling; Systematic literature review; Use

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937545222     PISSN: 18200214     EISSN: 24061018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2298/CSIS140610006K     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J. Analysis and Design of Business Processes Using BPMN. Handb. Bus. Process Manag. 1 (2010). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00416-2
2. Birkmeier, D., Overhage, S. Is BPMN Really First Choice in Joint Architecture Development? An Empirical Study on the Usability of BPMN and UML Activity Diagrams for Business Users. QoSA.
3. Bizagi. BizAgi [Online]. http://www.bizagi.com/ [30 May 2014]
4. Börger, E. Approaches to modeling business processes: a critical analysis of BPMN, workflow patterns and YAWL. Softw Syst Model 11: 305–318, (2011).
5. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80: 571–583, (2007).
6. Bulander, R. A Conceptual Framework of Serious Games for Higher Education. E-bus. (ICE-B), Proc. 2010 Int. Conf.
7. Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A. BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Comput Stand Interfaces 34: 124–134, (2012).
8. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., Bordons, M. Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: effects of different calculation methods. Scientometrics 82: 517–537, (2010).
9. Couto, F.M., Pesquita, C., Grego, T., Veríssimo, P. Handling self-citations using Google Scholar. Int J pf Sci Inf Bibliometr 13, (2009).
10. Cruz, E.F., Machado, R.J., Santos, M.Y. From Business Process Modeling to Data Model: A Systematic Approach. 2012 Eighth Int. Conf. Qual. Inf. Commun. Technol. (September 2012). DOI: 10.1109/QUATIC.2012.31
11. Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J. Process modeling. Commun ACM 35: 75-90, (1992).
12. Davenport, T.H. The Coming Commoditization of Processes. Harv. Bus. Rev.
13. Decker, G., Grosskopf, A., Barros, A. A Graphical Notation for Modeling Complex Events in Business Processes. 11th IEEE Int. Enterp. Distrib. Object Comput. Conf. (EDOC 2007) (October 2007). DOI: 10.1109/EDOC.2007.41
14. Decker, G., Puhlmann, F. Extending BPMN for Modeling Complex Choreographies. In: OTM’07 Proceedings of the 2007 OTM Confederated international conference on On the move to meaningful internet systems: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS. (2007), p. 24–40.
15. Design, B.I. of. Prefuse [Online]. (2007). http://prefuse.org/
16. Dubani, Z., Soh, B., Seeling, C. A Novel Design Framework for Business Process Modelling in Automotive Industry. 2010 Fifth IEEE Int. Symp. Electron. Des. Test Appl. (2010). DOI: 10.1109/DELTA.2010.48
17. Fernández, H.F., Palacios-González, E., García-Díaz, V., G-Bustelo, B.C.P., Martínez, O.S., Manuel, J., Lovelle, C. SBPMN - An easier business process modeling notation for business users. Comput Stand Interfaces 32: 18–28, (2010).
18. Figl, K., Recker, J., Mendling, J. A study on the effects of routing symbol design on process model comprehension. Decis Support Syst 54: 1104–1118, (2013).
19. Gartner. Gartner [Online]. http://www.gartner.com/ [30 May 2014]
20. Google. Google Trends [Online]. http://www.google.com/trends/ [30 May 2014]
21. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE 2007-001.
22. Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 51: 7–15, (2009).
23. Kruczynski, K. Business process modelling in the context of SOA – an empirical study of the acceptance between EPC and BPMN. World Rev Sci Technol Sustain Dev 7: 161-168, (2010).
24. Magnani, M., Montesi, D. BPMN: How Much Does It Cost? An Incremental Approach*. BPM’07 Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Bus. Process Manag.
25. Mendeley. Mendeley - Reference management software [Online]. http://www.mendeley.com/ [30 May 2014]
26. Milanović, M., Gašević, D., Wagner, G. Combining Rules and Activities for Modeling Service-Based Business Processes. 2, (2008).
27. Muehlen, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M. Sometimes Less is more: Are Process Modeling Languages Overly Complex? EDOC Conf. Work. 2007. EDOC ’07. Elev. Int. IEEE (2007). DOI: 10.1109/EDOCW.2007.30
28. Muehlen, M., Recker, J. How Much Language is enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation. Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Syst. Eng.
29. Müller, R., Rogge-Solti, A. BPMN for Healthcare Processes. Proc. 3rd Cent. Work. Serv. their Compos. ZEUS 2011.
30. OMG (Object Management Group). Business Process Model and Notation Specification [Online]. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0
31. OMG. BPMN.ORG [Online]. www.bpmn.org [30 May 2014]
32. OMG. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification., (2011).
33. Ottensooser, A., Fekete, A., Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., Menictas, C. Making sense of business process descriptions: An experimental comparison of graphical and textual notations. J Syst Softw 85: 596–606, (2012).
34. Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P. The ontological deficiencies of process modeling in practice. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (June 15, 2010). DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2010.38
35. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P., Indulska, M. Do Ontological Deficiencies in Modeling Grammars Matter? Mis Q 35: 57–79, (2011).
36. Recker, J., Rosemann, M. The Measurement of Perceived Ontological Deficiencies of Conceptual Modeling Grammars. Data Knowl Eng 69: 516–532, (2010).
37. Recker, J., Wohed, P., Rosemann, M. Representation Theory versus Workflow Patterns - The Case of BPMN. ER’06 Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Concept. Model. (2006). DOI: 10.1007/11901181_7
38. Recker, J. BPMN Modeling – Who, Where, How and Why. BPTrends.
39. Recker, J. Business Process Modeling - A Comparative Analysis. J Assoc Inf Syst 10: 333–363, (2009).
40. Recker, J. Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN. Bus Process Manag J 16: 181–201, (2010).
41. Recker, J. Continued use of process modeling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors. Eur J Inf Syst 19: 76–92, (2010).
42. Recker, J. Explaining usage of process modeling grammars: Comparing three theoretical models in the study of two grammars. Inf Manag 47: 316–324, (2010).
43. Recker, J. BPMN Research: What We Know and What We Don’t Know. 4th Int. Work. BPMN 2012 (2012). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33155-8_1
44. Recker, J. “Modeling with tools is easier, believe me” The Effects of Tool Functionality on Modeling Grammar Usage Beliefs. Inf Syst 37: 213–226, (2012).
45. Reisig, W. Remarks on Egon Börger: “Approaches to model business processes: a critical analysis of BPMN, workflow patterns and YAWL, SOSYM 11:305–318.” Softw Syst Model 12: 5–9, (2013).
46. Ritter, D., Ackermann, J., Bhatt, A., Hoffmann, F.O. Building a Business Graph System and Network Integration Model Based on BPMN. Bus. Process Model Not. - Third Int. Work. BPMN 2011.
47. Rodriguez, A., Fernandez-Medina, E., Piattini, M. A BPMN Extension for the Modeling of Security Requirements in Business Process. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E90-D: 745–752, (2007).
48. Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P. A Study of the Evolution of the Representational Capabilities of Process Modeling Grammars. 18th Int. Conf. CAiSE 2006 (2006). DOI: 10.1007/11767138_30
49. Sharma, D.K., Rao, V. Configurable Business Process Modeling Notation. In: 2014 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), p. 1424-1429.
50. Solís-Martínez, J., Espada, J.P., Pelayo G-Bustelo, B.C., Lovelle, J.M.C. BPMN MUSIM: Approach to improve the domain expert’s efficiency in business processes modeling for the generation of specific software applications. Expert Syst Appl 41: 1864–1874, (2014).
51. Verdouw, C.N., Beulens, a. J.M., Trienekens, J.H., Wolfert, J. Process modelling in demand-driven supply chains: A reference model for the fruit industry. Comput Electron Agric 73: 174–187, (2010).
52. Weske, M. Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architecture. Springer, (2007).