Explaining usage of process modeling grammars: Comparing three theoretical models in the study of two grammars

Information and Management

Volumn 47, Issue 5-6, 2010, Pages 316-324

  Recker, Jan ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Continuance; Expectation confirmation theory; Perception measurement; Process modeling; Technology Acceptance Model

Indexed keywords

EXPECTATION CONFIRMATION THEORY; EXPLANATORY POWER; HYBRID MODEL; INITIAL ADOPTION; LEAD USERS; MEASUREMENT PROCESS; MODEL RESULTS; PROCESS MODELING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; THEORETICAL MODELS; USAGE INTENTION; USAGE MODELS; USER CHARACTERISTICS; USER INTENTION;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 77955472086     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2010.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. A. Bhattacherjee Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model MIS Quarterly 25 3 2001 351 370
2. BPMI.org, OMG, Business Process Modeling Notation Specification, Final Adopted Specification, Object Management Group, February 20, 2006, http://www.bpmn.org.
3. I. Davies, P. Green, M. Rosemann, M. Indulska, and S. Gallo How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering 58 3 2006 358 380
4. W.H. DeLone, and E.R. McLean The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update Journal of Management Information Systems 19 4 2003 9 30
5. W.R. King, and J. He A meta-analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model Information & Management 43 6 2006 740 755
6. Y. Lee, K.A. Kozar, and K.R.T. Larsen The Technology Acceptance Model: past, present, and future Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 50 2003 752 780
7. G. Premkumar, and A. Bhattacherjee Explaining information systems usage: a test of competing models Omega 36 1 2008 64 75
8. J. Recker Continued use of process modeling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors European Journal of Information Systems 19 1 2010 76 92
9. J. Recker Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN Business Process Management Journal 16 1 2010 181 201
10. J. Recker, M. Rosemann, M. Indulska, and P. Green Business process modeling: a comparative analysis Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 4 2009 333 363
11. A.-W. Scheer ARIS - Business Process Modeling 2000 Springer Berlin, Germany
12. H. SeJoon, J.Y.L. Thong, and K.Y. Tam Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet Decision Support Systems 42 3 2006 1819 1834
13. R.A. Spreng, S.B. MacKenzie, and R.W. Olshavsky A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction Journal of Marketing 60 3 1996 15 32
14. X. Tan, and K. Siau Understanding the acceptance of modeling methods by IS developers: a theoretical model and an empirical test Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems Milwaukee, WI 2006
15. V. Venkatesh, and H. Bala Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions Decision Sciences 39 2 2008 273 315
16. V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view MIS Quarterly 27 3 2003 425 478
17. Y. Wand, and R. Weber Research commentary: information systems and conceptual modeling - a research agenda Information Systems Research 13 4 2002 363 376
18. C. Wolf, and P. Harmon The State of Business Process Management - 2008 2008 www.BPTrends.com