Corrigendum re: “Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial” [Eur Urol 2015;68:216–25] (S0302283815001943) (10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029);Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction after Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial

European Urology

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 216-225

  Haglind, Eva ^a   Carlsson, Stefan ^b   Stranne, Johan ^a   Wallerstedt, Anna ^b   Wilderäng, Ulrica ^c   Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis ^c,d   Lagerkvist, Mikael ^e   Damber, Jan Erik ^a   Bjartell, Anders ^f   Hugosson, Jonas ^a   Wiklund, Peter ^b   Steineck, Gunnar ^b,c  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^e UroClinic   (Sweden)

^f LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Erectile dysfunction; Open radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL INDEX OF ERECTILE FUNCTION; LUNG DISEASE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT HISTORY OF SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE WEIGHT; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SWEDEN; URINE INCONTINENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAPER; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; MULTICENTER STUDY; ODDS RATIO; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

AGED; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMANS; INCONTINENCE PADS; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84937524327     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.022     Document Type: Erratum

References (32)

1. Q.D. Trinh, A. Bjartell, S.J. Freedland, and et al. A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 64 2013 786 798
2. A. Bill-Axelson, L. Holmberg, H. Garmo, and et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer N Engl J Med 370 2014 932 942
3. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, R.C. Rosen, and et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 405 417
4. P.S. Moran, M. O'Neill, C. Teljeur, and et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open and laparoscopic approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Urology 20 2013 312 321
5. A. Tewari, P. Sooriakumaran, D.A. Bloch, U. Seshadri-Kreaden, A.E. Hebert, and P. Wiklund Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 1 15
6. G. Novara, V. Ficarra, S. Mocellin, and et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 382 404
7. J.C. Hu, X. Gu, S.R. Lipsitz, and et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy JAMA 302 2009 1557 1564
8. A.E. Nilsson, S. Carlsson, B.A. Laven, and N.P. Wiklund Karolinska prostatectomy: a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique Scand J Urol Nephrol 40 2006 453 458
9. A. Wallerstedt, S.I. Tyritzis, T. Thorsteinsdottir, and et al. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 67 2015 660 670
10. T. Thorsteinsdottir, J. Stranne, S. Carlsson, and et al. LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Scand J Urol Nephrol 45 2011 102 112
11. C.B. Begg, E.R. Riedel, P.B. Bach, and et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy N Engl J Med 346 2002 1138 1144
12. J.E. Thompson, S. Egger, M. Böhm, and et al. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases Eur Urol 65 2014 521 531
13. M.S. Litwin, D.P. Lubeck, J.M. Henning, and P.R. Carroll Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database J Urol 159 1998 1988 1992
14. A. Månsson, L. Henningsohn, G. Steineck, and W. Månsson Neutral third party versus treating institution for evaluating quality of life after radical cystectomy Eur Urol 46 2004 195 199
15. H.G. Van der Poel, C. Tillier, W.M. de Blok, C. Acar, E.H.A.M. van Muilekom, and R.C.N. van den Bergh Interview-based versus questionnaire-based quality of life outcomes before and after prostatectomy J Endourol 27 2013 1411 1416
16. F. Abdollah, M. Sun, N. Suardi, and et al. Prediction of functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of conditional survival analyses Eur Urol 62 2012 42 52
17. A.J. Vickers, M. Kent, J. Mulhall, and J. Sanghu Counseling the post radical prostatectomy patients about functional recovery: high predictiveness of current status Urology 84 2014 158 163
18. G. Steineck, F. Helgesen, J. Adolfsson, and et al. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting N Engl J Med 347 2002 790 796
19. U. Kreicbergs, U. Valdimarsdottir, E. Onelöv, J.I. Henter, and G. Steineck Talking about death with children who have severe malignant disease N Engl J Med 351 2004 1175 1186
20. G. Dunberger, H. Lind, G. Steineck, and et al. Fecal incontinence affecting quality of life and social functioning among long-term gynecological cancer survivors Int J Gynecol Cancer 20 2010 449 460
21. G. Steineck, H. Hunt, and J. Adolfsson A hierarchical step-model for causation of bias-evaluating cancer treatment with epidemiological methods Acta Oncol 45 2006 421 429
22. G. Steineck, K. Bergmark, L. Henningsohn, M. al-Abany, P.W. Dickman, and A. Helgason Symptom documentation in cancer survivors as a basis for therapy modifications Acta Oncol 41 2002 244 252
23. A.E. Nilsson, M.C. Schumacher, E. Johansson, and et al. Age at surgery, educational level and long-term urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy BJU Int 108 2011 1572 1577
24. E. Johansson, G. Steineck, L. Holmberg SPCG-4 Investigators Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial Lancet Oncol 12 2011 891 899
25. R.C. Rosen, A. Riley, G. Wagner, I.H. Osterloh, J. Kirkpatrick, and A. Mishra The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction Urology 49 1997 822 830
26. A. Wallerstedt, S. Carlsson, G. Steineck, and et al. Patient and tumour-related factors for prediction of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy Scand J Urol 47 2013 272 281
27. R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2011 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria
28. T.E. Ahlering, D. Woo, L. Eichel, D.I. Lee, R. Edwards, and D.W. Skarecky Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes Urology 63 2004 819 822
29. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, S. Fracalanza, and et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution BJU Int 104 2009 534 539
30. M.J. Barry, P.M. Gallagher, J.S. Skinner, and F.J. Fowler Jr. Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of Medicare-age men Clin Oncol 30 2012 513 518
31. V. Ficarra, G. Novara, T.E. Ahlering, and et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 2012 418 430
32. A.J. Vickers, F.J. Bianco, A.M. Serio, and et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy J Natl Cancer Inst 99 2007 1171 1177