Prediction of functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Results of conditional survival analyses

European Urology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 42-52

  Abdollah, Firas ^a   Sun, Maxine ^b   Suardi, Nazareno ^a   Gallina, Andrea ^a   Bianchi, Marco ^a,b   Tutolo, Manuela ^a   Passoni, Niccolò ^a   Tian, Zhe ^b   Salonia, Andrea ^a   Colombo, Renzo ^a   Rigatti, Patrizio ^a   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^b   Montorsi, Francesco ^a   Briganti, Alberto ^a  

^a SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conditional survival; Erectile dysfunction; Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy; Prediction; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84861628264     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. F. Abdollah, M. Sun, and R. Thuret A competing-risks analysis of survival after alternative treatment modalities for prostate cancer patients: 1988-2006 Eur Urol 59 2011 88 95
2. M.R. Cooperberg, A.J. Vickers, J.M. Broering, P.R. Carroll Investigators ftCotPSUREC Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer Cancer 116 2010 5226 5234
3. N.J. Birkmeyer, J.B. Dimick, and D. Share Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan JAMA 304 2010 435 442
4. A. Heidenreich, J. Bellmunt, and M. Bolla EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease Eur Urol 59 2011 61 71
5. J.L. Stanford, Z. Feng, and A.S. Hamilton Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study JAMA 283 2000 354 360
6. M.G. Sanda, R.L. Dunn, and J. Michalski Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors N Engl J Med 358 2008 1250 1261
7. M. Alemozaffar, M.M. Regan, and M.R. Cooperberg Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer JAMA 306 2011 1205 1214
8. A. Briganti, A. Gallina, and N. Suardi Predicting erectile function recovery after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a proposal of a novel preoperative risk stratification J Sex Med 7 2010 2521 2531
9. R.F. Coelho, B. Rocco, and M.B. Patel Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers J Endourol 24 2010 2003 2015
10. J.A. Eastham, P.T. Scardino, and M.W. Kattan Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram J Urol 179 2008 2207 2210 discussion 2210-1
11. F. Montorsi, A. Salonia, and N. Suardi Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy Eur Urol 48 2005 938 945
12. P.C. Walsh Preservation of sexual function in the surgical treatment of prostatic cancer - an anatomic surgical approach Important Adv Oncol 1988 161 170
13. J.C. Cappelleri, R.C. Rosen, M.D. Smith, A. Mishra, and I.H. Osterloh Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function Urology 54 1999 346 351
14. F. Abdollah, M. Sun, and J. Schmitges Surgical caseload is an important determinant of continent urinary diversion rate at radical cystectomy: a population-based study Ann Surg Oncol 18 2011 2680 2687
15. F. Abdollah, L. Budaus, and M. Sun Impact of caseload on total hospital charges: a direct comparison between minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy - a population based study J Urol 185 2011 855 861
16. M. Sun, M. Bianchi, and Q.D. Trinh Hospital volume is a determinant of postoperative complications, blood transfusion and length of stay after radical or partial nephrectomy J Urol 187 2012 405 410
17. K. Avery, J. Donovan, T.J. Peters, C. Shaw, M. Gotoh, and P. Abrams ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence Neurourol Urodyn 23 2004 322 330
18. F. Montorsi, G. Brock, and J. Lee Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 54 2008 924 931
19. S. Punnen, M.R. Cooperberg, N. Sadetsky, and P.R. Carroll Among potent men post radical prostatectomy, does the need for phosphodiesterase inhibitors have an impact on sexual bother scores? BJU Int 109 2012 1520 1524
20. S.J. Wang, R. Emery, C.D. Fuller, J.S. Kim, D.F. Sittig, and C.R. Thomas Conditional survival in gastric cancer: a SEER database analysis Gastric Cancer 10 2007 153 158
21. H. Skuladottir, and J.H. Olsen Conditional survival of patients with the four major histologic subgroups of lung cancer in Denmark J Clin Oncol 21 2003 3035 3040
22. R. Thuret, M. Sun, and F. Abdollah Conditional survival predictions after surgery for patients with penile carcinoma Cancer 117 2011 3723 3730
23. F.E. Harrell Jr., K.L. Lee, and D.B. Mark Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors Stat Med 15 1996 361 387
24. F.E. Harrell Jr., R.M. Califf, D.B. Pryor, K.L. Lee, and R.A. Rosati Evaluating the yield of medical tests JAMA 247 1982 2543 2546
25. S.V. Burgess, F. Atug, E.P. Castle, R. Davis, and R. Thomas Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy J Endourol 20 2006 827 830
26. J.C. Hu, Q. Wang, C.L. Pashos, S.R. Lipsitz, and N.L. Keating Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol 26 2008 2278 2284
27. F. Greco, M.R. Hoda, and S. Wagner Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients BJU Int 108 2011 583 587
28. D.S. Finley, E. Rodriguez Jr., D.W. Skarecky, and T.E. Ahlering Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing BJU Int 104 2009 1484 1489